STW research club, I propose for the second subject building 7 9/11 event

I am of the opinion that when the term pull it was used, it was in reference to the controlled demolition of building no 7 of the world trade center. There are those that say this is in reference to the pulling out of the firemen that were working in building 7.

So is there any evidence that there were explosives in building 7? or that the firemen had already been pulled out and as such didn’t need to be pulled out?

To answer the first question http://911research.wtc7.net/

There is also a lot of footage on youtube of firemen saying that there are bombs in the buildings.

Anyone want to look into what the actual police and firemen were saying and if they can find any more evidence of explosives?

woody, there will be plenty of time later to research other things, hopefully I will be involved in that, once we learn how to work together and focus on accomplishing the goals, that the group sets out.

I am of the opinion that when the term pull it was used, it was in reference to the controlled demolition of building no 7 of the world trade center.

A rough rule of thumb should be to reject what you think and believe the opposite

HTH

there will be plenty of time later, once we learn how to work together and focus on accomplishing the goals, that the groups of well intentioned individuals involved decide upon.

will we get to post stuff on youtube as I have always wanted to be a proper scientist – that BsC and the published stuff counts for nothing compared to this exciting opportunity

I am of the opinion that when the term pull it was used, it was in reference to the controlled demolition of building no 7 of the world trade center.

Well you obviously don’t know much about the terminology used in Demolition then do you ?

Ok, so ask yourself this……… In the Demoltion industry, what does “Pull it” actually mean ?

And then ponder on why that term would be used, when people are claiming that the building was brought down by a controlled explosion.

As usual, your not making any sense I’m afraid.

there is a new type of pest, the concrete worm, developed by the CIA in a crazy attempt to destabalise the old soviet union,by having massive structural failures in their high rise concrete cities, this was abandoned.
However it may be that some rogue operatives let loose some of these worms in New York, sufficiently weakening a number of buildings, that are then at risk from seemingly small fires etc.

I am of the opinion that when the term pull it was used, it was in reference to the controlled demolition of building no 7 of the world trade center. There are those that say this is in reference to the pulling out of the firemen that were working in building 7.

WHY WILL YOU NOT LISTEN TO THE OBVIOUS TRUTH?

Count Duckula has webbed feet, ideal for getting a good grip in rubble strewn streets. Ask yourself why the authorities didn’t allow for the testing for trace levels of broccoli in the ruins after the building was pulled.

Of course, there are those who say that CD is just a patsy for I.G.O.R and N.A.N.N.Y.

kaesae – Member

I am of the opinion that when the term pull it was used, it was in reference to the controlled demolition of building no 7 of the world trade center.

Clearly. But why? Whatever happened to the building, it definately wasn’t pulled down. And you also need to ask exactly how the fire brigade would go about doing it, even if they chose to. The context of the conversation doesn’t lend itself at all to pre-planned demolition.

The 911research site is genuinely funny

So we are to believe the FDNY, already massively depleted numbers and equipment, suddenly had the ability to carry out a full scale demolition, something they don’t generally train their firefighters in? Well that sounds legit.

Add to that, all the misinformation going around that day and the fact no one could confirm what actually hit the first tower until the world watched the second plane hit, it’s not unreasonable to believe that the news may report things as having happened when they may not have, that’s generally why they start wit “unconfirmed reports”

Any of these so called documentaries I’ve watched on you tube just prove to me that people only hear what they want to hear

Quite impressive having the skill to demolish a building that size with the collapse going top down. Rather than the usual blowing of the base. Wouldn’t you say?

How deluded do you have to be, to think sitting in your y-fronts in your bedsit reading wacky websites, counts as serious research….

Now there’s an image I didn’t want

Even Omar Al-Farouq is getting a little frustrated as one of the Al Queda operatives who planned the WTC atrocity.

Upset that after 2 months planning in a cave people don’t believe it was Al Queda.

http://singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/who-are-the-most-totally-absolutely-bonkers-fruit-loops-you-know

I’m a bit confused here, and as most of you seem to know a great deal about it, where has someone said the FDNY ‘took down’ the building?

There is also a lot of footage on youtube of firemen saying that there are bombs in the buildings.

Anyone want to look into what the actual police and firemen were saying

I don’t really see how that’s relevant. At that point misinformation and rumours are going to be rife, your average beat copper is going to know as much about bombs in buildings as the Slovakian Synchronised Swimming team.

at the moment of the incodent it s safe to say there was a greta deal of confusion on the gorund, panic, fear etc.
It is hardly surprising that there are at the tme reports that later proved to be false

As cougars notes Why would a fireman be an expert in bomb recognition
Given they were inside a burning building what sort of visibility and view do you think they had

As for lots – what % of firemen claimed this it will be a very small percentage hence the vague claim of lots

Lots of folk deny global warming – they are still less than 1 % of scientists who operate in that area/field.

There is also a lot of footage on youtube of firemen saying that there are bombs in the buildings.

There’s a lot of footage on YouTube of cats playing pianos.
But I’m not going to be buying tickets to a performance.

How deluded do you have to be to start imagining internet-using folk sitting around in their underwear…

Junkyard and IanMunro have already explained what “Pull It” refers to. It means to pull out the rescue/fire effort.

Does it now, does it really? You see I get where kaesae’s coming from. You see it’s not widely known, but you find this out via a little internet based serious research (*), that building 7 was the international headquarters of the giant lizard men from outer space and was the base for their primary intergalactic shuttle craft. Made of cellulose or sellotape or silly putty or something. When the building caught fire, the ship was in imminent danger of being discovered, so the earthly representative of the giant lizard men from outer space (D. Icke esq) issued the command to reconfigure the spaceship into a more natural habitat for the giant lizardmen from outer space – a large pool that they could hide until fuss died down, hence the instruction to “pool it”. However, doing this using the freaky outer space technology available only to the purple shell suit wearing monsters generates a massive magnetic field which, accidentally turned the largest nearby objects (the twin towers) into giant magnets, attracting several nearby aircraft into them and causing them to crash into the towers.
Evidence – have you seen any ginat lizrdmen from outer space since? Well have you? No. QED my friends, QED.

* best carried out wearing only soiled underpants whilst subsisting off a diet of plain popcorn and living “off the grid” (apart from the internet, and electricity, and tv, and some other stuff).

I struggle with long sentences

has Kaesae done the one about the extra devices attatched to the underside of the planes yet, and that they “go off” before hitting the buildings?

Out of curiosity, has any reasonable evidence been produced to support this 911 truther theory.

Aside from the confused youtube “evidence”

Out of curiosity, has any reasonable evidence been produced to support this 911 truther theory.
Aside from the confused youtube “evidence”

Of course not.

The “heroes” of the conspiracy theory INDUSTRY such as Alex Jones etc. make loads of money out of telling lies to gullible people about stuff.

Those gullible people tell everyone else (that believe in Science, logic, evidence etc) that they are Sheep and can’t see the “truth” while Alex Jones makes a fortune out of the “truthers”

It’s a perfect scam.

Kael, mate go and ride you bike, develop your component range, step away from this stuff and do something else.
It’s not going to be doing your business or yourself any good.

Happy trails! 😀

LoCo makes a very good point

LoCo makes a very good point

As have several people. It doesn’t seem to help, though.

I think he’ll have more luck here;
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/

Especially the ‘Human Race Get Off Your Knees’ subsection

I think he’ll have more luck here;

OMG Kurt Cobain was murdered by the CIA!

http://www.thenational.ae/arts-culture/books/debunking-9-11-myths-conspiracy-plots-are-sheer-fantasy

Look I’ve done some research.

36% of Americans surveyed, now believe that it was an inside job 😯 considering you just saw how open minded the media is and that they are trying very hard to rubbish these claims and the evidence, that’s an interesting fact!

I don’t doubt that it will take a long time for most people to wake up to the truth, however if you get bored while this process occurs, why not borrow money from the banks that you can then pay interest on, to bail the banks out of the shit they got you into!

Should give you lot something to do, in the mean time 😉

36% of Americans now believe that it was an inside job considering you just saw how open minded the media is and that they are trying very hard to rubbish these claims and the evidence, that’s an interesting fact!

It’s amazing that they asked everyone single American and they all answered.

36% of Americans now believe that it was an inside job

how many believe the world was created 7,000 years ago in 7 days?

The national survey of 1,010 adults also found that anger against the federal government is at record levels, with 54 percent saying they “personally are more angry” at the government than they used to be

Thirty-six percent of respondents overall said it is “very likely” or “somewhat likely” that federal officials either participated in the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon or took no action to stop them “because they wanted the United States to go to war in the Middle East.”

No wait they asked only just over 1k and out of that 36% they didn’t all say they believed it was an inside job, it includes those that thought they Government knew it may happen. So it could have been 1 who said they thought it was the US Government that did all this or even none.

So that’s 360 Americans, not all of which believe it’s an inside job and with a 4% error margin. Now I’m pretty sure the American population is a little bigger than 1k.

So who needs to wake up to the truth then?

Wonder how the demographics for the poll work out? Knowing ‘Truthers’ the poll will have been taken just outside a ‘Truther’ convention.

Obviously I don’t need to prove that, you just need to wake up.

Have to say Kaesey, glad your back. Youre terribly amusing trolling or no trolling

The numbers for that survey aren’t so bad- 1000 isn’t necessarily a bad statistical sample.

But there’s space for a huge range of views in this:

it is “very likely” or “somewhat likely” that federal officials either participated in the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon or took no action to stop them

That’s a very long way from saying that 36% of people actually think the towers were demolished.

That’s a very long way from saying that 36% of people actually think the towers were demolished.

It’s not that far in the mind of a true believer.

The UK needs to wake up to the truth, where exactly do you see the UK being in the next 10 years?

Our situation is deteriorating rapidly, everything from rubbish strewn streets to mass civil unrest.

The banks are still out of control and we are yet again being driven into another global conflict.

9/11 was the starting point for this era of mass murder, mass lies and mass useless idiocy and I for one would very much like to see the UK wake up and start working together to sort the shit that the rich and powerful have got us into.

9/11 was an inside job, how is it that so many people believe in the lie? the same reason people walk about not looking where they are going or how people can justify being obese or lying stealing and cheating others, we live in a meticulously created fantasy world. That is all too rapidly coming crashing down!