Policy that suits England but damages Scotland
What policy suits the whole of England but none of Scotland?
Molgrips, you strike me as an intelligent chap. Which makes it all the more perplexing that you are able to misconstrue the opinions of others again and again and spout this utter tripe.
Thanks but what I am doing is calling out what appears to be the sub-text here. The ‘us and them’ thing is hard baked into many of the argument being presented. If you take it for granted that Scots and English (well, rUK but whatever, same thing innit) are fundamentally different groups of people. Which is a question of nationalism. If you start to question wether or not Scotland might be simply a part of the UK, then it all looks quite different. I mean you’ll say ‘but Scotland votes differently to the UK’ but a) they have a credible centrist party that’s not available in rUK and b) lots of areas of the UK vote differently to each other, so that’s not really a good criterion. On that basis you cannot lump all of England or even all of Wales together. Yes, Westminster decisions go against Scots, but they go against lots of areas of the UK.
What I am doing is trying to examine the nationalist ideas being shown here.
For the record I don’t begrudge anyone a Yes vote, I’d be likely to do the same due to my objections to the poor political system in Westminster. But I wouldn’t do it because I thought Scots ‘deserved the right to govern themselves’ because they already do to the same extent (actually more) than everyone else in the UK.