If you have given fair chance for someone in front to overtake and they don’t, then fair enough. My issue is with people who do not give fair chance for other people to pass, and barge through anyway.
I got little or no suggestion of anyone disagreeing with this from what I’ve read. However it is a very subjective argument and one person’s “fair chance” is another’s “you’ve blown it sunshine”. Once an argument loses objectivity it’s had it. That is why this is destined to run and run until someone puts it out of its misery or we run out of pictures of funny animals. Since the latter is highly unlikely we should all pray for the former
Yeah you’re right, but after I tried to say exactly what I just said up there, everyone started berating me as some kind of incompetent driver. So then we had zoomypants = good, everyone else = pathetic.
Yeah you’re right, but after I tried to say exactly what I just said up there, everyone started berating me as some kind of incompetent driver. So then we had zoomypants = good, everyone else = pathetic.
That’s what got me pissed off.
(Nearly) everyone was trying to offer sensible and constructive advice. I don’t recall anyone jumping to the over-simplistic conclusion above.
My fave bit was the shopping trolley analogies. I found those hilarious in their irrelevance, as analogies often are 😆
The fact you think the analogy is relevant is exactly why this has gone on for 30 pages*. Once the argument turns to the relevance of the (inevitable) analogies used to demonstrate the argument, it’s a lost cause. I’ve been there many times.