Home Forums Chat Forum Osbourne says no to currency union.

Viewing 40 posts - 4,721 through 4,760 (of 12,715 total)
  • Osbourne says no to currency union.
  • duckman
    Full Member

    Ben,there isnt a plan b for currency. AS is relying on the rUK trading off using the pound in return for something missile shaped,certainly till England can build something capable of storing them. I have always favoured independence,but I always wanted it to be an incremental process to avoid upheaval, eg devo max. Since Cameron’s best move was ensuring it was off the table( wonder why he might be afraid of it…) The it is a “yes” now. Afterwards I expect it to basically be a decade of devo max with an slow process of becoming fully independent. Should we vote no,and it is close,then history suggests we will be put firmly in our place,just like the last time,and Scotland will have another 35 years of watching our industries traded with Spain,getting to test new taxes etc.
    In the desire to portray yes voters as “Mel Gibson wannabies” A lot of people seem to forget or ignore the fact that the Scots have twice voted in a party that favours independence. Yet the no campaign has been to try and scare us or point out how good things are just now,despite voters telling them that they aren’t.

    Junkyard
    Free Member

    All the pros and none of the cons. He is an economic magician.

    I dont think he really believes this any more than GO believes that iS mortgages will be £5 k per year worse off – they are both describing BS scenarios to suit their political agenda….it is still what politicians everywhere do.

    if you believe that Scotland can walk away with and live with no debt

    Everyone believes this, even you, because it is a fact [ one of the few areas where we do have facts]. No one actually thinks they will but everyone accepts they can.
    As for Plan B – GO has no plan B either – and ben is correct it is just at the willing waving stage.

    Ducks your probably correct that a smooth transition to independence would have been the best but I dont think this is what will happen
    How skilfully and how willing each side is to horse trade is anyones guess tbh…but i imagine few of look on with admiration at the choice of candidates.

    teamhurtmore
    Free Member

    AS doesn’t have another plan, he has been truthful about that (!) and admitted that F Comm are working on next alternative (not that difficult). Since he doesn’t actually want policy independence he started with the € before moving on the the £. No he has to accept that his goals will promotable require (in time) a seperate current and accept that this has pros and cons.

    Scotland cannot walk away – that is the fact – in the future an iS will still need to raise capital via the financial markets. The worst thing that they could do would be to destroy credibility by walking away from UK debt (“technical default” since actual default cannot happen by defitnitely). That would be extreme folly. It is not a fact it is BS. Highly appropriate BS in the context though. This is the real bluff be bluster and HM Treasury know that full well as does anyone with a basic graps of global capital markets. AS is not that stupid in practice.

    teamhurtmore
    Free Member

    Bloody IPad autocorrect above – too late to edit

    No – now
    Promotable – probably
    Current – currency
    Be – and

    bencooper
    Free Member

    Graps? 😉

    teamhurtmore
    Free Member

    Missed that one Ben!!!!

    iPads are a nightmare for typos 😉 and unintentional autocorrects!

    Junkyard
    Free Member

    AS doesn’t have another plan, he has been truthful about that (!)

    Amusingly I find it hard to believe he has not thought of a Plan B at some point. I can see why he wont ever say what it is publicly. Amusing role reversal here with me thinking he is being dishonest and you believing him 😀

    I think they can leave debt therefore it is true. Neither of us think they will so I dont see the sense in debating whether it would be folly or prudent as it wont happen.
    OK its sunny i have carb loaded its ride o clock
    See you in two hours 😉

    epicyclo
    Full Member

    athgray – Member
    I can see if you win, you have no concern in trodding on the views of a large portion of fellow Scots….

    Just like if they win, they won’t care about my views? That’s what happens when you win/lose a vote.

    If only we could get rid of this troublesome democracy stuff. Perhaps by having an elected house full of sock puppets to keep the masses happy, but with an upper house full of people who share our values to keep the sock puppets under control. With an establishment controlled press we would have no problem convincing the masses they have democracy.

    Now how can we go about getting such a system? Oops, we already have it… :mrgreen:

    jambalaya
    Free Member

    THM turn the autocoreect off ! I think by complaining abiut your ipad auto correct you may br reinforcing North/South divide steriotypes 😉

    @ben you are taking a percentage of the land, the top bit as it where. An interesting side factoid is that whilst you are getting more than 9% of the area you are getting less than 9% of the value. I personally don’t see the parallels between Scotland and Canada/Australiia examples, they left the Empire many years ago when natural rescourcex where cheap/plentiful/undiscovered. You can try the moral/historical argument all you like but its not going to count for anything. Scotland (may) want to leave the UK, it has to do it on the UK’s terms.

    Weve been round the currency thing many times, AS knows he has to takr the euro if he wants to be in the EU. He equally knows he cannot say so as its likely to be a massive vote loser.

    As no one has answered my questions on Scottish banks, I’ll do so research myself. Standard. Life I believe set up a bank but not sureif they still have it as it didnt reallywork out. TSB, RBS, BOS are just brands owned by UK banks.

    athgray
    Free Member

    epicyclo, I find some of your views deeply troubling. Even if the result goes in favour of No, I understand a significant number of Scots are not happy. A No result will not be cause for celebration. Not wishing to see the UK break up in future, the views of this large portion of FELLOW Scots will have to be considered. I would like to think we could move to a devo max arrangement. Your use of ‘they’ to describe the other side is perhaps most worrying of all.

    teamhurtmore
    Free Member

    Jambalaya – I know! On banks, I have explained on here earlier. Depends on legal status eg branch v subsidiary.

    konabunny
    Free Member

    As no one has answered my questions on Scottish banks, I’ll do so research myself. Standard. Life I believe set up a bank but not sureif they still have it as it didnt reallywork out. TSB, RBS, BOS are just brands owned by UK banks.

    What is your question? Whether there will be any retail banks in Scotland after independence? Whether there will be any Scottish-headquartered banks after independence? It’s unclear what you’re asking.

    epicyclo
    Full Member

    athgray – Member
    epicyclo, I find some of your views deeply troubling. Even if the result goes in favour of No, I understand a significant number of Scots are not happy. A No result will not be cause for celebration. Not wishing to see the UK break up in future, the views of this large portion of FELLOW Scots will have to be considered. I would like to think we could move to a devo max arrangement. Your use of ‘they’ to describe the other side is perhaps most worrying of all.

    True enough, if it is a No vote, then we will continue to keep working for separation. In the same way as we have for the last 100 years, peacefully and using the democratic process.

    As for a devo max, that would have been a good solution but it was not offered.

    I believe a federated UK with independent parliaments for each of the respective countries might have worked.

    As far as I am concerned, any solution which includes an unelected upper body is unacceptable, and I will always oppose it.

    gordimhor
    Full Member

    We’re a Jock Tamsons bairns

    fasternotfatter
    Free Member

    As for a devo max, that would have been a good solution but it was not offered.

    Was it even asked for? Didn’t the SNP campaign for an independence referendum and not devo max? In the event of a no vote devo max needs to provide benefits to Scotland and the rUK. If it doesn’t then it shouldn’t happen, Scots should take into account that they might not get devo max and vote accordingly in the independence referendum.

    epicyclo
    Full Member

    fasternotfatter – Member
    …Didn’t the SNP campaign for an independence referendum and not devo max? In the event of a no vote devo max needs to provide benefits to Scotland and the rUK. If it doesn’t then it shouldn’t happen, Scots should take into account that they might not get devo max and vote accordingly in the independence referendum.

    The independence movement is much more than just the SNP, so there’s divergent opinions on what is best.

    I agree, devo isn’t on offer, so the only choice is to vote Yes for independence (or otherwise).

    Judging by some of the comments coming from the unelected house, it looks like if we vote No, then we will once again be punished for our temerity in wanting separation – just like 1979.

    At least this time we know what to expect if we’re daft enough to believe vague promises from the UK govt.

    ernie_lynch
    Free Member

    The independence movement is much more than just the SNP, so there’s divergent opinions on what is best.

    Except that it isn’t, is it ? Last Scottish general election the SNP received 45% of the vote, the latest opinion poll puts support for Scottish independence at 34%

    http://uk.reuters.com/article/2014/05/18/uk-scotland-independence-polls-idUKKBN0DY0D020140518

    So a good chunk of SNP voters don’t support independence. If support for independence doesn’t even extend to all SNP supporters then it’s not likely to extend much beyond the SNP.

    rene59
    Free Member

    Scotland (may) want to leave the UK, it has to do it on the UK’s terms.

    epicyclo
    Full Member

    ernie_lynch – Member
    The independence movement is much more than just the SNP, so there’s divergent opinions on what is best.
    Except that it isn’t, is it ? Last Scottish general election the SNP received 45% of the vote, the latest opinion poll puts support for Scottish independence at 34%…

    Oh dear.

    Let’s see, on one hand we have an actual vote – which shows 45%.

    On the other hand we have a poll, which is basically extrapolated opinion based on a small sample, and it shows 34%

    Which to believe? Reality, or the politically motivated poll?

    BTW the polls before the last election were also similarly very pessimistic about the SNPs chances. It’s almost as if there was a guiding hand…

    bencooper
    Free Member

    they left the Empire many years ago when natural rescourcex where cheap/plentiful/undiscovered

    Okay, let’s look at this in detail – you want to divide the oil reserves up by population, right?

    Is that the relative population today, on the day of independence, or when the oil is actually pumped out of the well? Because population number change.

    And is that all the oil that is possibly in the North Sea? We don’t know how much there is. Or is it only the declared reserves? In which case what do we do when more oil is discovered, or it turns out a well doesn’t have as much as predicted?

    Now, does this only apply to oil, or does it apply to other resources? Coal? Gas? Shale oil? Limestone, silica sand, gold, timber? Same questions apply to those – how on earth do you divide those up by population?

    It’s totally unworkable, which is why it’s never happened – never mind the reason that it’s in Scottish territory so it’s Scottish.

    ernie_lynch
    Free Member

    Oh dear.

    Let’s see, on one hand we have an actual vote – which shows 45%.

    On the other hand we have a poll, which is basically extrapolated opinion based on a small sample, and it shows 34%

    Which to believe? Reality, or the politically motivated poll?

    Oh dear.

    You think there is a “politically motivated” conspiracy involving Reuters and ICM.

    Junkyard
    Free Member

    Last Scottish general election the SNP received 45% of the vote, the latest opinion poll puts support for Scottish independence at 34%.

    do any of these polls show that no tories, labour supporters, lib dems or others support independence
    Your a big fan of the polls what do they show? i looked for as much as two perhaps three minutes then got bored

    i did find this though

    Wilson is part of a quiet revolt that may, some polls suggest, swing the result, seeing as many as 250,000 Labour supporters vote yes

    Its the guardian though – well what would you expect 😉

    http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/apr/25/ed-miliband-labour-supporters-voting-scottish-independence

    Its certainly more a SNP than the others but not exclusively…more bitter toegther project fear eh 😛

    piemonster
    Free Member

    BTW the polls before the last election were also similarly very pessimistic about the SNPs chances. It’s almost as if there was a guiding hand…

    IIRC most polling companies recorded a big swing to SNP in the run up nearer to the election did they not? It was just that Panelbase recorded a high SNP result further out from the actual vote?

    That’s a question btw.

    ernie_lynch
    Free Member

    do any of these polls show that no tories, labour supporters, lib dems or others support independence

    Well I guess that some Tory, Labour, and LibDem voters, will be supporting “independence”, which would put support for independence among SNP supporters even lower.

    Bearing in mind that most supporters of Scottish independence will have voted SNP, and most SNP supporters will support independence, it shows that support for independence isn’t, contrary to claims made by epicyclo, “much more than just the SNP”. It’s probably a little more, but not “much more”.

    Your a big fan of the polls what do they show?

    I recognise that within limitations they can provide a reasonable assessment of public opinion. This recognition isn’t based on whether or not the opinion polls are saying what I want them to say.

    A little while ago, in fact only a week or two ago, all the saltire waving nats on here were wetting themselves in excitement because the opinion polls were showing shifts in their favour, now that this no longer appears to be the case they are instead dismissing opinion polls as some sort of “politically motivated” conspiracy.

    Engage in hypocrisy if you want, but I prefer not to.

    ninfan
    Free Member

    Bencooper, this page:

    Okay, let’s look at this in detail – you want to divide the oil reserves up by population, right?

    Is that the relative population today, on the day of independence, or when the oil is actually pumped out of the well? Because population number change.

    And is that all the oil that is possibly in the North Sea? We don’t know how much there is. Or is it only the declared reserves? In which case what do we do when more oil is discovered, or it turns out a well doesn’t have as much as predicted?

    Now, does this only apply to oil, or does it apply to other resources? Coal? Gas? Shale oil? Limestone, silica sand, gold, timber? Same questions apply to those – how on earth do you divide those up by population?

    It’s totally unworkable, which is why it’s never happened – never mind the reason that it’s in Scottish territory so it’s Scottish.

    Bencooper, page 12 of this very thread:

    Then divide by the percentage of the UK population who live in Scotland.

    Yup, absolutely. Everything gets shared that way – assets, liabilities, things where no-one can agree if they’re assets or liabilities, everything. It’s the only fair way to do it.

    epicyclo
    Full Member

    ernie_lynch – Member
    Oh dear.
    You think there is a “politically motivated” conspiracy involving Reuters and ICM.

    Nope, I just think the polls have proven to be wildly inaccurate, so either their methodology is wrong or they are being manipulated. Take your choice.

    The only thing that counts is the actual vote.

    Talking of which, we have one coming up….

    ernie_lynch
    Free Member

    You made it very clear that you think the opinion polls are “politically motivated”. Read your own posts.

    epicyclo
    Full Member

    I already know what I think.

    Just thought you might like to consider why they are so far out.

    bencooper
    Free Member

    Ninfan, I refer you to my reply way back on page 12 – you’re confusing an asset and a natural resource.

    ernie_lynch
    Free Member

    Well you don’t seem to know what you think. Firstly you dismissed the ICM poll as “politically motivated”, then when you realised the absurdity of that you backtracked and claimed that you meant “wildly inaccurate”.

    There’s a big difference between “politically motivated” and “wildly inaccurate”, as I’m sure you realise.

    ninfan
    Free Member

    you’re confusing an asset and a natural resource.

    Given your stance on what a currency is

    Hahahahahahahahah 😆

    However I’ll repeat your own words to you again

    Everything gets shared that way – assets, liabilities, things where no-one can agree if they’re assets or liabilities, everything. It’s the only fair way to do it.

    So, which part of the word Everything did I not understand Ben?

    rene59
    Free Member

    …put support for independence among SNP supporters even lower.

    I would think that support for independence among SNP supporters would be very high, among SNP voters is another thing. Don’t confuse the two.

    epicyclo
    Full Member

    ernie_lynch – Member
    Well you don’t seem to know what you think…

    I do, however I have no control over your interpretations.

    Junkyard
    Free Member

    Ernie I asked for evidence [polls]to support your claim repeating it is not actually evidence.

    Engage in hypocrisy if you want, but I prefer not to.

    I asked for the polls you did not post any and I am the hypocrite 😯
    FWIW I dont actually have much of an opinion here tbh I asked for evidence what you gave me was your opinion again with some really hurtful nasty words…meany 🙄

    so do you have polls showing what way supporters of each political party intend to vote or not? we dont need to debate it we could have actual facts rather than your opinion for a third time.

    ernie_lynch
    Free Member

    I asked for the polls you did not post any and I am the hypocrite

    I haven’t called anyone a “hypocrite”. I suggested that being enthusiastic about opinion polls when they are in your favour but then dismissing them when they weren’t amounted to hypocrisy.

    You either pay attention to opinion polls or you don’t, irrespective of whether they back up your agenda or not. I thought the logic behind that was obvious.

    As for your question whether I “have polls showing blah blah” I know better than to try and engage in any meaningful debate with you, especially on this thread.

    You predictably come out with bollox like “you gave me was your opinion again with some really hurtful nasty words”, or “you called me a hypocrite”, and quite frankly I can’t be arsed beyond superficial and cursory comments. And I generally avoid reading most of what you post – I suggest that you perhaps take a reciprocal attitude towards me ? 🙂

    piemonster
    Free Member

    Do either of you need a cuddle?

    ernie_lynch
    Free Member

    JY might…..I’ve been hurtful and nasty to him apparently.

    bencooper
    Free Member

    So, which part of the word Everything did I not understand Ben?

    Okay, I should probably have been clearer. “Everything” doesn’t include air, soil, the British sense of humour, natural resources, and pretty much anything that’s, well, nonsense to try to share by population.

    So how do you think it would work? How would you divide up the oil?

    I’m supposed to be the one clinging to some idea despite the facts 😉

    ninfan
    Free Member

    and pretty much anything that’s, well, nonsense to try to share by population.

    Like the pound?

    So how do you think it would work? How would you divide up the oil?

    Like the pound?

    You continue to want to pick and choose your interpretation of what amounts to an ‘asset’ that can be divided in the most dubious and preferential fashion Ben!

    It remains a lot easier and achievable to allocate equitable shares of the oilfields than it is to share the ‘asset’ of an established currency…

    fasternotfatter
    Free Member

    If iScotland wants a share of banknotes then that is fine. It just doesn’t get the rUK as a lender of last resort.

Viewing 40 posts - 4,721 through 4,760 (of 12,715 total)

The topic ‘Osbourne says no to currency union.’ is closed to new replies.