Home Forums Chat Forum 2015-16 rugby, world cup year

  • This topic has 7,395 replies, 232 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by WillH.
Viewing 40 posts - 7,241 through 7,280 (of 7,396 total)
  • 2015-16 rugby, world cup year
  • teamhurtmore
    Free Member

    Lovely jubbly

    One for the Farrell haters 😉

    DezB
    Free Member

    One for the Farrell haters

    World **** class 🙂

    How can they pick a man of the match? they were all brilliant.

    DanW
    Free Member

    If you were Australian then I imagine you’d be screaming at the TV for them not kicking points, taking passes straight out of the James Haskell school of catching and chasing the game far more than they needed too rather than controlling a bit more. Joubert was a bit random but England came in with a plan and executed perfectly. Maybe the answer to England’s attacking 10 conundrum is Jamie George? 🙂

    How can they pick a man of the match?

    Exclude Mike Brown and then share it out from there?* 🙂

    * If we can’t knock Farrell then our second favourite has to take the heat 🙂

    yossarian
    Free Member

    That was bloody IMMENSE.

    jambalaya
    Free Member

    Quality performance, outstanding defence.

    Quick thinking on the grubber kick from Jamie George, made that score along with the Lawes break.

    teamhurtmore
    Free Member

    Does Dylan have the worst ears in rugby?!?

    DezB
    Free Member

    Number 2 in the World!

    I’d like to see Ford off and Burrell back on next week, Goode at 15.

    namastebuzz
    Free Member

    One for the Farrell haters

    I still hate him but he played well.

    Aussies didn’t make their dominance pay. Their half backs were truly dire.

    Gutsy win for England. A bit of grit even if there was little style.

    Still – 2-0 is something to smile about. Think that puts us up to two in the rankings. 😀

    DezB
    Free Member

    Ears? have you seen Mako’s? 😆

    thegreatape
    Free Member

    Jamie George – the new Stuart Barnes!

    namastebuzz
    Free Member

    I’d like to see Ford off and Burrell back on next week, Goode at 15.

    Is this Stuart Lancaster?

    Ford was very good and he tackled brilliantly. Particularly when he stopped Folau and smothered the pass with a free man outside who would have scored.

    Brown was pish but Goode is no better……

    DezB
    Free Member

    So? you wouldn’t. I would! 🙂
    Also, Brown wasn’t pish, he dropped 2 high catches, but was a massive past of that defence.

    namastebuzz
    Free Member

    So? you wouldn’t. I would!

    I don’t see what the Farrell/Burrell axis could do that it didn’t do last week?

    I thought the Ford/Farrell pairing worked better last week and worked OK today given that we didn’t have the ball too much in the Aussie half.

    namastebuzz
    Free Member

    Also, Brown wasn’t pish, he dropped 2 high catches, but was a massive past of that defence

    True, he was, but all 15 are supposed to be able to tackle. It’s a basic skill of rugby – it’s not comparable to a Phil Bennett sidestep.

    He was pish because, after being pinned in their own 22 for ages, when England finally snaffled the ball he had the chance to kick downfield, with no Australians back, and he tried running out and just put the pressure back on all over again. Besides, a fullback is meant to catch high balls isn’t he? 😉

    wrecker
    Free Member

    Brown wasn’t great today, in fact he wasn’t great last week either. I wish he’d pass, just once a game would be an improvement. Ford was not by any measure brilliant, but he did put some pretty impressive tackles in. Kicking was a bit aimless and he kicked one dead too. The only player who was crap was youngs, just shit. Mako was dead on his feet after 50, they kept him on too long.

    jambalaya
    Free Member

    We’ve won these games because Ford is at 10. This series have proven that even below his best form is he is our forst choice 10 by a long way. Barnes pointing out now how important Ford has been.

    Naughty Hooper, throwing dirt in Haskell’s face

    Twitter Link

    wrecker
    Free Member

    We’ve won these games because Ford is at 10.

    you really don’t understand rugby do you?
    I don’t even know if you are being intentionally strange, that comment is so absurd. We have won because of the pack and because the defensive system has been impeccable. Even a part time armchair fan who has never played the game should be able to see that.

    jambalaya
    Free Member

    England with Farrell at 10 are dull and dysfunctional, he started the first test there and we where lucky not to have been dead and buried inside 15 minutes

    Everyone on Sky especially Barnes praised Ford’s play, I’ll take their international expertease over yours Wrecker every single minute of every day.

    Farrells future at international level is away from the 10 shirt, same as Mike Catt

    wrecker
    Free Member

    Ford is bloody lucky that we don’t have loads of good 12’s, otherwise he’d be on the bench.

    DanW
    Free Member

    There is a bit of a shortage of *proper* 12’s in the NH in general I’d say. The backline today with Watson at 15 and a form winger in his place is as good as it gets for now. A play making 10 with Farrell at 12 (for the sake of kicking points) isn’t the worst thing in the world and might even let someone like Slade creep in eventually. If they’ve managed to protect and carry Ford then it can’t be too hard to swap in someone else 🙂

    As an aside, if you’ve ever played centre and been responsible for the goal kicking then you’ll appreciate how bloody hard it is to be more exhausted, constantly in the thick of things, shake off the inevitable dead legs, etc compared to 10… and still keep putting the ball over the posts. I am in no way a Farrell fan but that in itself is quite an achievement!

    jambalaya
    Free Member

    Ford Farrell is bloody lucky that we don’t have loads of good 12’s, otherwise he’d be on the bench.

    My thoughts entirely. Farrell needs to think about 15. He has not been first choice at 10 now for nearly 3 years (think thats right, 18 months before RWC swapped back in disastrously during the tournament now back with 12 on his back)

    Lets see what happens with the Lions, there must be a decent chance neither he nor even Ford make the tour

    wrecker
    Free Member

    Well we saw in the first game who is more likely to be benched didn’t we?
    Had Burrell been up to spec, ford would have played about 10 minutes and we’d be wondering what the point of the man was. Farrell has been one of the top 3 players on the field for every one of englands games this year. Ford has not.

    DanW
    Free Member

    Farrell is like Biggar in what he brings to a team. Of course everyone wants moar moar moar but he’s pretty bloody good at the moment- one of the first down on paper for a Lions Tour is it were happening tomorrow. If not, where are your points coming from? Got to agree with Wrecker on the Burrell comment and there is no way in hell Farrell would ever feature at 15, even for a local pub side!

    wrecker
    Free Member

    Currently Farrell is undroppable. He’d get into most teams in the world. It hasn’t always been that way, there have been times previously when I thought he should be dropped for Ford. Presently he the the far betetr player but that could well change again if ford gets his shit together. Lots of rumours flying around regarding things at bath which might account for his average (being generous) performance this year.
    Go look of the COML forum, the bath fans are unanimous in their assessment of his performances this year being sub par.

    namastebuzz
    Free Member

    Ford has been sub par this year, no doubt, but he’s been pretty capable these last two tests.

    The pack didn’t get on top today but the defense held firm. However, Ford pulled the strings and kicked from hand very effectively too.

    He is still the best 10. If Farrell was so great then he’d be there and they’d have Slade or someone at 12.

    Youngs had one of those games he frequently has when the pressure is really on – totally sh*t. Fortunately, Phipps was worse and Foley not much better.

    tallie
    Free Member

    wrecker – Member
    Currently Farrell is undroppable.

    That’s surely indisputable? Noticeable that Ford also seems to be improving whilst on tour – perhaps being away from a toxic club environment is helping?

    Today was very much a victory for the forwards and the defence and whilst I don’t wish to take anything away from a great team effort both the conditions and the ref helped. Saying that, EJ is a great tactician and maybe he’d have had a different game plan (or even team) for different conditions.

    We still seemed to overrun the ball on the odd (once, twice?) occasion we passed the ball down the line; surely a top 5 international backline shouldn’t keep making this schoolboy error? Agree with the general comments on Brown – you can’t fault him for effort but he missed a couple of high balls, is generally half a yard too slow and virtually never passes; great D though which is maybe why he’s still there?

    wrecker
    Free Member

    The issue is that Farrell has to play, and ford is a nicer option at 10 than burrell is at 12 (which was the original preference) so in he goes. Slade hasn’t enough experience at 12 for Jones to throw into these games, but when he has, then we’ll see what happens. If Baxter plays Slade at 10, what with Devoto arriving at chiefs then Fords place could really be in danger. Early days for henry but I think he is (or has the potential to be) one of the most talented english players we have had in years.

    Whilst we’re bitching about ford vs farrell, it was nice to see that they are still such good mates. They had a big old cuddle at the end of that game.

    Strong rumours that ford jnr caught ford snr hiding his sausage in one of the female club staff.

    Kryton57
    Full Member

    Yes Yes Yes (just seen it).

    Apart from the comments above, the best bit about this team is how they adapted to the Aus attack. No same ‘ol same ‘ol as per the last regime. Good players playing good rugby.

    I did think we lacked attack, but obviously Eddie knows how the team will win a particular kind of match better than I do, and the players aren’t that different from previous, so he must be a fairly decent coach eh.

    namastebuzz
    Free Member

    The issue is that Farrell has to play

    Indeed. That’s it. Right there.

    As rugby moves towards NFL style substitutions maybe at some point in the future a bloke will run on, kick it and run off again……

    DanW
    Free Member

    What a difference 40 minutes makes. Was looking like a cricket score for Ireland at one stage but what a heartbreaking end

    namastebuzz
    Free Member

    Eliota Fuimaono-Sapolu reckons England should duck out of the third test and hop over the Tasman Sea to play the ABs next weekend.

    I’d like to have seen that.

    They should have put in a caveat that if both series were 2-0 then they could swap opponents. Australia v Wales and NZ v England would be a lot more interesting than another win for NZ and a dead rubber (whatever anyone says) in the Cook Cup.

    wrecker
    Free Member

    I really want to see the new look gnarly england play SA. I wanna see itoge vs etzebeth.

    deadslow
    Full Member

    at times like this its always interesting to see how the media down-under react: Here is the headline from the Sydney Morning Herald.
    Eddie came, Eddie saw, Eddie conquered!
    and this article ”Rugby league is a simple game played by simple people. Rugby union is a complex game played by w——.”
    Does make me smile when they get a little riled!

    mikewsmith
    Free Member

    At times it can be a great feeling listen to Aussie’s commentating on their defeat… Must have something to do with having to endure it as an Englishman for so long.

    But the biggest positive was the completely contrasting styles of the 2 games. Good teams win in their own style, great teams win. Having the confidence to be able to swap or change tactics depending on what you face is brilliant.
    Regardless of the series being over there is everything to play for – 3-0 is something the Aussies don’t want to to let happen, hopefully a better pitch and my Saturday night is sorted

    mikewsmith
    Free Member

    And a final point discipline, other England sides would have gifted penalties away that would have negated all of their hard work.

    grahamt1980
    Full Member

    Deadslow- love the second article, God they are whinging. I did like the bit about Nsw winning a minimum of 10 of the last 10 league cups, maybe more!
    Maths isn’t a strong suit either

    dantsw13
    Full Member

    By SMH standards, those articles strike me as being quite impressed by what we achieved, and more down on their own teams.

    anagallis_arvensis
    Full Member
    namastebuzz
    Free Member

    Bit of good news

    Shame Toulon won – they could have flown him out for the 3rd test otherwise….

    anagallis_arvensis
    Full Member

    Shame Toulon won – they could have flown him out for the 3rd test otherwise….

    They could anyway. Toulon owner would blow a gasket mind. 1/2ps “delay” in getting fit was tactical though I reckon.

Viewing 40 posts - 7,241 through 7,280 (of 7,396 total)

The topic ‘2015-16 rugby, world cup year’ is closed to new replies.