Might be worth it then… could be an education in just how damaging it can be to look for links that aren’t necessarily there.

In case you have not noticed the title of this thread refers to the Rotherham child abuse scandal. The sexual abuse on the estimated 1,400 children in Rotherham between 1997 and 2013 was predominantly carried out by gangs of British-Pakistani men. These were not politicians, celebrities, or others in power.

The culture of ignoring or not taking seriously allegations of child sex abuse is not confined to a powerful and wealthy elite, it goes right through the whole of society.

Relatively powerless people living on council estates have got away with child sexual abuse and operating pedophile rings.

That after all was the news story which led to this thread being started.

Cool, you might want to read through the thread in it’s entirety…

In that case save yourself the drama… derailing it to the Queen’s potential involvement was your doing on the last page, but nice try.

Have you come up with a satisfactory answer as to who has authority over both the UK Home Office and Jersey yet?

You have repeatedly claimed that the Queen is involved in this alleged conspiracy, which you say is vital to the control structures of the political and religious elite.

Obviously you don’t always say it directly and actually spit the words out, because you much prefer innuendos, which is why you often post pictures with no accompanying text.

The last time you claimed the Queen was involved was just a few hours ago on the previous page to this one. You of course did it indirectly but it’s crystal clear what you meant by this :

Who has authority over both the UK Home Office and Jersey?

Posted 7 hours ago # Report-Post

The reason why I keep going back to your wild and ridiculous allegation that there is a pedophile ring led by the Queen, which is vital to the control structures of the political and religious elite, is because every time there is an investigation or arrest or successful prosecution, you want to take credit and claim that it backs up your theory. It does no such thing. In fact it does the opposite.

No one should be surprised that there has been pedophiles among establishment figures, it doesn’t make JHJ claims correct, as some people seem to think.

Pedophiles, and their past ability to operate with relative impunity, transcends social classes, as the Rotherham abuse scandal proves, there is no reason to expect the wealthy and powerful elite to be pedophile-free.

Ernie Lynch – makes you think

In addition to being investigated by the Met Police under Operation Midland (Dolphin Square, MPs, Military bases etc), Edward Heath is also being investigated by Jersey Police under Operation Whistle.

This is thanks to the hard work of many campaigners continuing to apply pressure, some of whom have fighting the cause for decades.

… and?

Why do you keep posting stuff like this as though it’s evidence? It just makes you look desperate.

Famous people meet other famous people all the time. It’s practically a politician’s raison d’etre. Pick any two well-known people at random and somewhere on the Internet there’s probably a photo of them in the same room. It proves precisely nothing, in fact it implies the opposite; that if that’s the best you can do then there probably isn’t much more to the “links” you’re so fond of.

Well, you seem to have heard of him. I’m not much into warfare specialists, myself.

Perhaps “famous” is the wrong word. You know what I mean though. (And nicely dodged, again.)

Your edits aside, why are you avoiding answering direct questions?

Scared you can’t or that your answers will be shown to be wrong?

I suggest we post this each time jhj avoids answering a question or posts a random picture instead.

Funny thing jhj is that I’m sure you’ve got lots of information that could inform, if not actually prove your big exciting conspiracy, but as usual you just lose the audience by posting rubbish all around it.

Eh?

Does the fact that Wallace was photographed with the PM mean he was part of the conspiracy?

Seems odd that he should then go and expose it…

Narrative fail!

So Wallace was a whistleblower rather than part of the conspiracy then?

In that case, what does the photo of him with Heath show us?

Makes you think doesnt it

Well if you ever bump into Buzz Aldrin don’t accuse him of not landing on the Moon.

“You’re a coward and a liar and ooofff”

Absolute classic 🙂

Some of you seem to have confused this with a David Icke thread…

I’ve already admitted on a number of occasions that there is still some question over the full picture, but there is no doubt whatsoever that there was co-ordinated activity involving the intelligence services and some very high level people, many of whom were associated with Jimmy Savile.

Colin Wallace, having being a psychological warfare expert, involved in Kincora (which has been linked to several similar venues such as Elm Guest House (as apparently has Edward Heath)) does tend to ring a few alarm bells… especially when the head of MI6 has also been implicated:

Well if (taxpayer funded) MI5 and MI6 have been using children from care homes to blackmail politicians (including the Prime Minister?) over several democratically elected governments, on whose authority have they been doing it?

It’s up to you…

you can choose to think I’m a fruitloop because it’s easier for you to dismiss that some properly horrific stuff goes on in the world, or you can trust me, as I’ve sacrificed a significant chunk of my life to researching the subject.

If you trawl through the forum you’ll find that before there was any mainstream news coverage, I mentioned the involvement of:

Leon Brittan
Greville Janner
Lord Mountbatten

among others.

I’ve been harping on about Jimmy Savile and Edward Heath on Jersey, as mentioned in this mainstream news report for over a year before the story broke:

A fifth police force receives allegations against Sir Edward Heath – amid claims the ex-PM took boys from Jersey out on his boat.

It’s a real shame I can’t easily convey the depth of research I’ve done…

Without getting too complex…

Is answered by:

and

It’s a process of deduction…

If I was closed minded, I wouldn’t be discussing it with you…

Who has sufficient influence over a number of different elected governments and across national jurisdictions?