Home Forums Chat Forum Ukraine

  • This topic has 19,742 replies, 535 voices, and was last updated 5 days ago by kimbers.
Viewing 40 posts - 4,601 through 4,640 (of 19,744 total)
  • Ukraine
  • binners
    Full Member

    A pop up site in Lille was meant to open today… Except it hasn’t and no-one even knew it was meant to be there till they heard it on the news.

    Not even any crisps and Kit Kats?

    Well, who’d have thunk it?

    Its almost as if they don’t actually want any Ukrainian refugees, but that couldn’t be the case, surely?

    kelvin
    Full Member

    This Russian POW has the heart of a lion

    And how brave are the Ukrainians telling the armed Russian forces, to their faces, the truth about their “libration” mission. Unbelievably brave. The old woman he talks about. That takes guts I don’t have.

    thols2
    Full Member

    Isn’t that what Blair and Bush did? Make up evidence of WMDs?

    Not quite. They used cherrypicked evidence. A lot of the evidence was inconclusive, there were things that were consistent with a WMD programme but could also have other uses. There were intelligence sources of dubious reliability. What they did was cherrypicked the evidence that supported their argument and suppressed the evidence against it. It’s still extremely bad practice but it’s not the same thing as actually manufacturing fake evidence.

    At the time it was obvious that they had decided to invade Iraq and were looking to justify it. It was also obvious that they hadn’t thought through the consequences and that the “they will greet us as liberators” claim was delusional. Saddam Hussein was a brutal tyrant and I don’t have any sympathy for him. Overthrowing him in itself wasn’t a concern for me, the concern at the time was that it was obvious that Iraqi and the region would be destabilized and the Iraqi people were going to pay a terrible price. It was a spectacularly stupid decision made even worse by the utter incompetence of the occupation that followed. Even if the evidence hadn’t been cherrypicked, it would still have been a spectacularly stupid decision.

    monkeyboyjc
    Full Member

    Quick question – with all the western companies pulling out of Russia, McDonald’s, coke, apple etc.

    What’s Russian employment law like – I’m guessing thousands if not millions now left without income?

    Poopscoop
    Full Member

    What’s Russian employment law like – I’m guessing thousands if not millions now left without income?

    MacDonalds are going to continue paying their staff. Can’t say for the test.

    monkeyboyjc
    Full Member

    👍 thanks.

    Poopscoop
    Full Member

    Chernobyl now relying on emergency diesel generators for the cooling. Should hold for a couple of days according to an expert in BBC at the mo.

    thols2
    Full Member

    I doubt China are too disappointed with the situation at all.

    I think they will be very anxious about it. It has motivated liberal democracies to take security issues seriously. China’s neighours are as anxious about Chinese aggressiveness as European countries are about Russia. This is likely to show that alliances with democracies are a better bet than allowing authoritarian countries to dominate you. The last thing China wants is to be surrounded by wealthy democracies that have a defense treaty with the U.S.

    seosamh77
    Free Member

    Poopscoop
    Full Member
    Chernobyl now relying on emergency diesel generators for the cooling. Should hold for a couple of days according to an expert in BBC at the mo.

    What’s going on there, is it Ukrainian sabotage? It makes no sense for Russians to turn off the power there?

    Poopscoop
    Full Member

    ^^ I think it’s just another way to worry the West.

    Putin is scrabbling for any leverage at the moment.

    Pieface
    Full Member

    Nor does it make any sense for the Ukrainian’s to sabotage it.

    Superficial
    Free Member

    Saddam Hussein was a brutal tyrant and I don’t have any sympathy for him. Overthrowing him in itself wasn’t a concern for me

    This is problematic logic though. You, based on the information that you have (been presented), feel that deposing someone is justified. I’m sure there are plenty of people in Russia that believe that Zelensky is a tyrant/NATO are oppressors/Ukraine is full of Nazis. This is based on incorrect data, of course, but you can’t argue with the logic employed – by which I mean a Russian of reasonable intelligence might come to the conclusion that invading Ukraine is justified.

    Obviously, neither of us nor the average Russian citizen are sanctioning invasions so it’s moot, and I’d hope that those who were had access to all the information, not just what the government’s mouthpieces spout. But when you begin to justify invasions, it feels like a slippery slope.

    welshfarmer
    Full Member

    What I don’t understand though is that there is no rule of war that says neither of the protagonists are allowed to purchase arms from a 3rd party? So what is simply stopping Poland from selling those planes to Ukraine? If they can’t buy arms from a NATO country as it might turn into WW3 then who can they buy arms from? Makes no sense why those planes and others aren’t already in the country in use.

    pk13
    Full Member

    McDonald’s are paying the staff I believe.
    Not sure about the others.Russian currency is now worthless so paying them is literally peanuts.
    If they kept open supplies would be limited and paying for supplies could be a huge issues for large companies.
    I think in the long run it’s cheaper to shut up shop than face the problems from the west.
    The McDonald’s are company owned not franchises like in the uuk so it’s a PR win but I bet it’s more a financial one.

    As for coke they can just fuge off anyway.

    seosamh77
    Free Member

    Well, there’s a massive Russian convoy and attack and buld up of troops coming from that direction, so it makes more sense for the Ukrainians to do something there than the Russians.

    @Superficial, I suggest you google ‘Halabja Chemical Attack/Massacre’ then come back and let us know if you’re still questioning if he was a tyrant.

    In fact, here’s a little tour of his better known works as a kind and compassionate leader.
    1974 — Dawa Killings
    1980 — Fayli Deportations and Killings
    1983 — Barzani Abductions
    1988 — Al-Anfal Campaign
    1988 — Halabja Massacre
    1990s — Marsh Arabs Devastated
    1990 — Invasion of Kuwait
    1991 — Kurdish and Shiite Rebellions
    1999 — Al-Sadr Assassination

    dissonance
    Full Member

    What I don’t understand though is that there is no rule of war that says neither of the protagonists are allowed to purchase arms from a 3rd party?

    There is also no rule that says you cant decide to attack those who supply weapons to your opponent. It has led to a few conflicts in the past.
    Poland seem to want to have the USA involved in the process to try and discourage the Russians from launching strikes, limited or otherwise, against Poland.
    The other problem is Poland still needs them currently. They are being phased out but not due for replacement yet so it looks like Poland are hoping to get some fast replacements (either F-16s or get the already scheduled F-35s delivered faster).

    Superficial
    Free Member

    @Superficial, I suggest you google ‘Halabja Chemical Attack/Massacre’ then come back and let us know if you’re still questioning if he was a tyrant.

    I wasn’t questioning anything about Saddam. Or Putin, for that matter. I’m sure they are/were both total rotters. I’m questioning the moral right of our leaders to send troops to remove people they don’t like.

    We can only act on our own understanding of the world, which might be quite different from others peoples’ understanding. Everything we do is framed by our experiences and culture, notwithstanding the (mis)information we receive. Mr average Russian probably isn’t evil but may hold a very different opinion about NATO to you or I.

    kelvin
    Full Member

    Let’s be honest, if your country bordered Ukraine, you wouldn’t feel very confident right now that other Western countries would come to your aid if RF starts salami slicing off bits of your territory.

    Poopscoop
    Full Member

    Anyone watching PM Q’s at the moment?

    kelvin
    Full Member

    Yes, feels like Miliband wrote Starmer’s questions… accelerating the shift to renewable energy and storage is key to our response, including restarting onshore wind expansion. And the response to the refugee situation is an embarrassment for everyone in the UK. Glad MPs from all other parties are joining Labour right now, one by one, calling for it to be changed.

    binners
    Full Member

    The lies are incredible

    “We’ve done more than any other country to resettle refugees”

    He actually stood at the despatch box and said that with a straight face

    MoreCashThanDash
    Full Member

    And the response to the refugee situation is an embarrassment for everyone in the UK.

    Sat in the car ranting at the radio – he has just lied again saying how we’ve led the world in helping refugees.

    Poopscoop
    Full Member

    He expects visas to rise to hundreds of thousands??

    Not a bloody chance that will ever happen.

    monkeyboyjc
    Full Member

    Started watching it 5mins later had to turn BJ off…

    He expects visas to rise to hundreds of thousands??

    Not a bloody chance that will ever happen.

    Theres only 37,000 or so Ukrainian nationals living in the UK so unless they all have three kids/partners the current visa  scheme couldn’t bring in 100s of thousands…..

    dissonance
    Full Member

    He expects visas to rise to hundreds of thousands??

    Maybe he got confused between how much he charged the Russian oligarchs for passports vs visas for Ukranians.
    It is utterly pointless. He just lies and lies.

    binners
    Full Member

    He’s now said that ‘The UK has led the way in economic sanctions against Russia’ while everyone openly laughed at him for making such a ridiculous claim.

    Everyone is asking about the pitiful response to refugees and he’s just repeating the same lies. The latest ‘we are moving heaven and earth…’

    Why on earth is he permitted to carry on spouting this utter bullshit in the face of clear evidence its all lies.

    Lindsey Hoyle is an absolute waste of space

    Northwind
    Full Member

    seosamh77
    Full Member

    I’m not a Trump fan, very far from it, but you think Putin would be threatening nukes if that mad bastard was still in office?

    Well no, he waited til after his useful idiot/asset had done maximum damage to NATO and western alliances and credibility, then invaded after he’d been put in the bin.

    blokeuptheroad
    Full Member

    It really does feel as if the world order has changed.  Interesting article about Japan’s significant support for Ukraine and a seismic shift in attitudes to defence spending etc similar to those recently seen in in Germany.

    “First Germany, now Japan leaves pacifism behind”.

    mrmonkfinger
    Free Member

    Lindsey Hoyle is an absolute waste of space

    Tory frontbench beg to differ.

    slowoldman
    Full Member

    I’m really struggling to see the problem with Nato being involved

    The Bomb Dmitri

    slowoldman
    Full Member

    There will be many who don’t agree with Putin’s decision but have a similar feeling to him with regards Russia’s greatness and do not want to see it relegated in the world order.

    Russia’s government needs to wake up and realise that military might isn’t the route to greatness. Russia has massive reserves of natural resources, it simply needs democracy and a willingness to trade with the rest of the world. It would get on very nicely. War creates isolation.

    scuttler
    Full Member

    Bunch of people up there ^^ reckoned trade was an enabler for war. Overall I beg to differ looking at the last 60 years in Europe. Sure there will be exceptions but I reckon dependencies brought about by globalisation have led to an overall increase in stability.

    sweepy
    Free Member

    He expects visas to rise to hundreds of thousands??

    I heard Hundreds and thousands, which sounds the same but means different

    Poopscoop
    Full Member

    @ scuttler

    Im with you on that. Closer economic ties aren’t a guarantee of peace but there is visible evidence it can help maintain it.

    cheese@4p
    Full Member

    He expects visas to rise to hundreds of thousands??

    Weasel Words

    binners
    Full Member

    Closer economic ties aren’t a guarantee of peace but there is visible evidence it can help maintain it.

    Absolutely! The gas supply to Europe from Russia being the case in point. Turning that off would be the financial equivalent of Mutually Assured Destruction. It would have absolutely instant and completely devastating consequences for both parties.

    That and not being able to get a Big Mac, obviously. How long will the population of any country put up with not having to remove the gherkin before they eat a burger?

    binners
    Full Member

    Shits getting real now!

    thols2
    Full Member

    kelvin
    Full Member

    I’m looking forward to the day that better links between Russia and the rest of the world can be built up again… including making them put up with Sting sat in the lotus position playing a lute at parties, and opening up a bun trying to find where the actual burger is that was shown in the photos. Let’s face it though, that’s all only going to get going again after Putin is gone… and as he’s made it so that he can stay in his post ’till 2036… in reality that means his dethronement now only comes with his death, like a roman emperor.

Viewing 40 posts - 4,601 through 4,640 (of 19,744 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.