Depends what you’re after. Rule of thumb (I think) is that the more the site costs, the more serious the clientele. Free ones have more people after casual relationships, more expensive ones are populated with those after something a little more long-term.
A friend-of-a-friend uses POF and has 10 women on the go at any one time. And that’s fine for him (and them) and everyone’s happy.
I dabbled with Matchaffinity and Zoosk. Both require quite a lot of effort to sign-up with. And as the name suggests, Matchaffinity does more to ‘match’ its clients. Zoosk doesn’t do that and you search through filters. And be warned there are a lot of desperate/odd people out there.
Met a really nice divorcee on Matchaffinty (fit, pretty, no kids, intelligent, funny) and all went well for a couple of months until I discovered how damaged she was. Single, fit, sane. Turns out she’d never got over her ex-husband/love rat and was incredibly flighty.
Had more luck with Zoosk. On paper, this girl sounded ideal. Absolutley perfect. However when we met there was nothing there. Went back for a second date to be absolutely sure and sure enough… there was nothing there. Baffling. Another girl (who I’ll be honest wasn’t even in my ‘maybe’ pile) contacted me. She was too short, lived too far away and had too many kids in tow. Anyway we met up and clicked instantly. Been together 4 months now and can safely say I’ve never been happier.
PS @ Cynic-Al:
The long distance thing killed it after a year or so but I wouldn’t have met her without online dating.
Out of curiosity, what sort of distance are we talking?