If labour had lost both there’s a chance corbs would’ve gone, which means labour could’ve found someone less divisive
As expected Corbyn team blaming disunity rather than leadership….
Copeland was bad for them, no doubt, if it was all about nuclear be NHS, it means corbs is having a -ve effect thetr
Stoke was odd one, a very pro remain candidate who was a bit of a dick won, in a 70% leave area !!
Though the Torries and ukip each got 25% of the vote.
Obviously very low turnout shows people are very disllusioned with our politics at the moment and who can blame them !