Home › Forums › Chat Forum › I'm Furious! (Nursery content)
- This topic has 187 replies, 97 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by martinhutch.
-
I'm Furious! (Nursery content)
-
mrmoofoFree Member
Perhaps if you don’t like the rules, then she shouldn’t be in nursery …..
chewkwFree MemberKryton57 – Member
I’ve been told tonight by the Nursery my 2.5yo has been withheld her pudding, as a punishment for refusing to help tidy up. I don’t believe they have the moral right to withhold food where available from a growing child. Or am I overreacting?
But that’s my first point. The second is that said daughter has an as yet undiagnosed liver/low blood sugar issue which they are aware of, and keeping her hungry aka blood sugars low can send her into seizure in the worse case. So im doubly furious!
Am I right?
Punishing 2.5 yr old! Wow ZMs in new low! FFS! The child is 2.5 yr old 😯
Only ZMs can rationalise such action towards a small child.
You are right to be furious.
stumpy01Full MemberOver-reacting IMO. Massively.
But, perhaps your daughters condition does require her to have dessert, I don’t know.
What are the potential consequences of her having her main meal but no dessert?Do you supply her meals to control her condition, or is it provided by the nursery? If provided by the nursery, is this adequate? Can they be expected to be responsible for controlling her condition/dietary requirements? Would it be better for your daughter if you provided the nursery with the necessary meals for her?
Dunno the answer to these questions. I don’t yet have kids, but if I did these would be the questions I’d be asking…NorthwindFull MemberKryton57 – Member
I didn’t creat a medical history , to tart up an Internet post Project, what do you take me for? She’s being treated for sudden crashing of blood sugars when in a fasted or deprived state
The question’s still there- was she in a “fasted or deprived state”, or did she just not have any pudding?
If she’s got a condition relating to hypoglycaemia, then pudding without solid food is a stupid idea and you need to address that. Sugar on top of a fast could insulin crash her and almost certainly destabilise her blood sugar worse than no food at all. This is a proper serious point.
But if she’d already had proper food within a few hours before, then she shouldn’t need dessert to keep her functioning either- she’s not fasted or deprived.
Either way- “depriving” her of pudding is a nonissue for her health, but it’s possible that there’s another health issue here.
I strongly suspect she was “deprived” of a treat not a staple but you’ve not cleared that up so there’s a bit of speculation there.
phil40 – Member
Nurseries have no right to deny food at ant time, even pudding
Do they have an obligation to provide pudding? Can they give treats for doing something good, like tidying up?
colpFull MemberThe nursery should have clearly defined discipline policies.
This sort of thing is their bread & butter.DavidBFree MemberPerhaps she didn’t help because she spotted Dick playing with Victoria’s sponge. I scream if someone plays with mine.
bigyinnFree MemberWhat are we getting all aireated about now?
Nothing bad happened, hopefully your child might learn a lesson. If you speak to the nursery I’d suggest you thank them for their discipline, but agree suitable punishment for your daughter.
Perhaps start with Chinese burns, then the typewriter building up in severity until you get to red hot needles under the fingernails?
Or perhaps just let them get on with their job, mmm?
Thus leaving you free to post tedious minutae on stw throughout the day.scotroutesFull MemberAre you suggesting that the OP, being extremely concerned about his daughters health, should consider some sort of full-time parental oversight until the issues have been identified and/or resolved?
bearnecessitiesFull MemberNot intended at all to be a cheap shot (we all have different lives) but have you seen SaxonRider’s post?
Properly upsetting and personally it’s putting my own woes in perspective.
Just a thought.
andylFree MemberDid they offer you the desert when you picked her up? You have paid for it after all 😉
esselgruntfuttockFree MemberWhen my kids didn’t tidy up (or whatever) they got no treats, ice cream, sweets, TV time etc etc.
The eldest one is 31 & the youngest is 28. Both doing very well, never been in bother (as far as I know!) Well mannered & generally good lads with good jobs & responsibilities.
Just saying OP.edlongFree MemberI’m sorry that your daughter is having these problems, and it must be pretty scary for you.
FWIW, I think you’ve overreacted, but it’s entirely understandable. I’d think that the best thing you can do for your daughter is to focus positively, and constructively on ensuring that she gets the best, most balanced, nutritious diet you can, and if that means you being a pain in the arse at the nursery, then so what? They’ll get over it. But be positive and constructive, unless you just want someone to get shouted at, or sacked, which is unlikely to directly benefit your daughter’s health.
Best wishes for her quick recovery and return to full fitness..
oh
and
FWIW I think it’s a bit shit that if a guy’s daughter is having unexplained seizures, people think it’s okay to be making ‘coma’ puns about it.
edlongFree MemberDid I read it right or did someone who actually knows about this stuff quote UN conventions on human rights in relation to this?
Is deprivation of pudding a human rights breach?
FFS please no one let my kids know about this, they’ll have me in Strasbourg…
brFree MemberApologies to Kryton for being naughty, now lets assume your daughter was elderley and she had ben deprived of a part of her meal, would that be anymore acceptable.
No refusing people food no matter what age for petty non medical reasons eg dietry, weight loss allergies, etc is not acceptable.
Report the matter to Care standards and see what they do/say, they inspect child care establishments.
This.
You are quite within your rights to act as you did, but you also need to be prepared to follow though anything you decide to do; ie ultimately, to move to a different nursery.
I would be booking a meeting with them asap to discuss.
fasthaggisFull MemberToo right ,go in strong and if they put you under any pressure ..don’t crumble.
jfletchFree MemberFurious may be a bit too far but the nursery were wrong IMO.
Using food as reward/punishment is just a way to create issues with food later in life and pudding is a great source of energy for kids.
I’d be almost certain it’s not policy to withhold food either, a quiet word with the nursery manager will garner an apology and ensure it doesn’t happen again.
The medical issues probably mean you’re a bit more on edge about it but it shouldn’t be a big deal.
BruceWeeFree MemberI’d be pissed off.
Did they offer any explanation about why she wouldn’t tidy up? Was she tired, hungry, angry, in pain? Did they make sure that she understood the cause and effect nature of not getting pudding? How did she take it, was she not bothered or screaming her head off and sobbing uncontrollably?
A lot of the responses on here remind me of the old, ‘I got smacked when I was growing up and it never did me any harm.’ Society changes and child rearing is one of those things that imporves over time. I’m sure it feels like kids today are ten times worse than in your day but that’s simply not the case. Take off the rose tinted spectacles.
I got punished a lot as a kid. I grew up to be an outwardly polite and friendly guy. On the inside, however, I’m angry far too often than can possibly be healthy. Unfortunately the only people who really suffer from this are the people closest to me.
I’m not saying that one thing caused the other. Maybe I’m just naturally predisposed towards anger and frustration but I can’t help but feel that it’s linked to the frustration I felt at being so powerless to prevent punishments that I didn’t fully understand what I had done to earn them.
Two and a half is very young. Intention, results, cause, and effect are all jumbled up at that age and punishment is not the best way to teach kids the difference. All it does is create confusion and insecurity.
NorthwindFull Memberedlong – Member
ensuring that she gets the best, most balanced, nutritious diet you can
No pudding ever again, in other words. That’ll larn her
cbFull Memberjudging by the sheer widths of the arses of my kids’ former nursery staff I’d bet that that pudding didn’t go uneaten…
RRDFree MemberOP – I think the nursery are in the wrong. Food should not be withheld regardless of the fact it is pudding.
BigDummyFree Membershe then started going on about the UNCRC (1989) welfare requirements
I love everything about this absurd thread with its Mumsnet-level lunacy and its puns, but the idea that the UN has insisted that pudding is an internationally-recognised right, for even ill-disciplined children is one of my favourite bits.
🙂
horaFree MemberOP you only ‘manage’ one child.
They have to cope with alot more.
I withold pudding and by eck it bloody works on our son.
phil40Free MemberThe point my wife was making (she bought up uncrc) is that there are more appropriate consequences to use with a child, rather than withholding food, and to be fair she knows a lot more about this area than any of us!
We are a signaturary of the convention and it does enshrine rights for children (I always thought they only had the right to silence!).
BigDummyFree MemberThe point my wife was making (she bought up uncrc) is that there are more appropriate consequences to use with a child, rather than withholding food, and to be fair she knows a lot more about this area than any of us!
With all due respect to your wife, I know enough about it to be confident that the UN do not think that children have a right to pudding regardless of bad behaviour.
Article 37 of the UNCRC provides that: “No child shall be subjected to torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Neither capital punishment nor life imprisonment without possibility of release shall be imposed for offences committed by persons below eighteen years of age;“.
I don’t think that covers this situation… 🙂
DrJFull MemberSome children are going without pudding!! Act now!! Text PUDDING to 27815. End this inhumanity today!
ransosFree MemberShe’s being treated for sudden crashing of blood sugars when in a fasted or deprived state by GOSH by medical personnel btw not the cleaner, , the underlying cause is not yet known.
But given that they fed her, that’s not really the issue here.
That said, as the parent of two children who go to nursery, I would not expect them to use the withdrawal of food as a punishment. They are in the wrong; you have overreacted. I’d be having a quiet word with them.
tomdFree MemberI’m just waiting for the follow up thread telling about the evil commandant of the nursery giving extra helpings of sugary puddings to a child with potential blood sugar issues as a reward for good behaviour.
deludedFree MemberSome children are going without pudding!! Act now!! Text PUDDING to 27815. End this inhumanity today!
I did ACTUALLY lol 😀
And this …
If in 20 years she still harbours anger and resentment over the matter I’d burn the place down. Play the long game.
This has been a great thread!
sandwicheaterFull MemberWhen was pudding relegated from “food” to “treat”?
When given after dinner or when being thrown in a food fight and your running low on ammunition. Oh, and on Tuesdays.
edhornbyFull MemberBy taking our kids to nursery we have to let other adults have the responsibility and the continuity of the decision making that day, after all they are in charge;
in no-cake parentis
phil40Free Memberconventions are about interpretation, and given that she lectures this stuff to undergraduates, and also works as an Ofsted inspector for nurseries (not the care quality commission). I would say her view still trumps ours!
Btw I got in t!rouble because I thought it was pretty reasonable punishment, but then again I used to think a smack was okay……how wrong I was 🙂
DrJFull Memberconventions are about interpretation, and given that she lectures this stuff to undergraduates, and also works as an Ofsted inspector for nurseries (not the care quality commission). I would say her view still trumps ours!
If that’s the case, then heaven help us. The UN spends time and effort (and money) to come up with conventions to protect truly needy people and someone imagines that it applies to sponge and custard? WT actual F is the place coming to?
The topic ‘I'm Furious! (Nursery content)’ is closed to new replies.