cos he will just nerf you off if you try
Hamilton hardly has a history of “nerfing people off”, he has a justifiable reputation as one of the fairest wheel-to-wheel racers on the grid. Ultimately you don’t win races by backing down in every confrontation and there’s a fine line between legitimately holding your line and causing a collision; any good racer will be right on that margin and Lewis was right on it yesterday.
Remember Verstappen vs Leclerc at turn 3 last year? Much more of a “nerf”. No penalty there: fair racing, said the stewards, despite Verstappen barging Leclerc from the inside whereas Albon put himself in the danger zone by trying round the outside where there’s always a good risk of your back end being nudged. So I’m not sure how you perceive a pro-Hamilton bias.
Fundamentally, trying round the outside of a medium speed corner with a gravel trap right next to the kerb is a super-risky strategy, especially if the person you’re trying to pass isn’t known for backing down. (Note that he did back down earlier in the race: when he was on the outside in the same corner.)
Not saying that it’s Albon’s fault and Hamilton was a bystander, but it’s racing, I don’t think anyone did anything wrong there. Albon rolled the dice (and all credit to him—he’s a great overtaker and had it worked he’d have achieved something amazing) but I think that’s one where he just needs to accept he got unlucky.
To me it’s a borderline penalty. Not super harsh, but for most of F1’s existence no-one would have batted an eyelid.