Home › Forums › Chat Forum › Boris Johnson!
- This topic has 17,755 replies, 686 voices, and was last updated 3 weeks ago by mattyfez.
-
Boris Johnson!
-
3politecameraactionFree Member
Go wild: Cornetto
A full Vienneta impaled on a stick
tjagainFull MemberI think Sunaks tactic is likely to be to change the vote to “note” the results of the committee findings rather than “accept” on the basis Johnson is no longer an MP.
1creakingdoorFree MemberI’m not wading back through all the previous pages to check if this has already been posted, so apologies if it has. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-politics-60205873
I have no skin in the game with the SNP or party politics, but Ian Blackford must be smiling ruefully this morning.
Listening to Nicky Campbell on 5Live this morning and they have some truly deluded people phoning in who still believe it to be a stitch-up and that he is innocent of all charges.
binnersFull MemberIts difficult to now argue with this…
"The resignation honours list is a list of some of the most discredited people in Britain today."
Chair of the Privileges Committee Chris Bryant: Rishi Sunak should grow a pair and revoke Boris Johnson's honours list. pic.twitter.com/eV9G2RLI5d
— PoliticsJOE (@PoliticsJOE_UK) June 15, 2023
tjagainFull MemberCreaking door – Blackford was just grandstanding and deliberately proving a suspension
3binnersFull MemberNadine just broke my Irony meter 😂
We also need to keep a close eye on the careers of the Conservative MPs who sat on that committee.
Do they suddenly find themselves on chicken runs into safe seats? Gongs?
Were promises made?
We need to know if they were.
Justice has to be seen to be done at all levels of this…— Rt Hon Nadine Dorries (@NadineDorries) June 15, 2023
1tjagainFull Memberan i ask, why is he not in jail? will he ever get punishment?
No criminal charges that could result in jailtime and its hard to see what there could be unless some actual evidence of corruption that will stand up in court can be found. Remember we have legalised bribing MPs in the UK with “lobbying contracts” and “consultant roles” and ” non exec directorships” as ways to channel money to MPs for favours
dissonanceFull MemberI think Sunaks tactic is likely to be to change the vote to “note” the results of the committee findings rather than “accept” on the basis Johnson is no longer an MP.
That was supposedly the plan but the pundits are now reckoning its changed given Sunaks references to normal procedure.
dissonanceFull MemberNadine just broke my Irony meter
I see she has wisely limited who can respond.
MoreCashThanDashFull Memberan i ask, why is he not in jail? will he ever get punishment?
When he’s found guilty of a crime, I hope he is.
I wouldn’t underestimate the number of nutters who will believe this is a stitch up, but they are just vocal and not very well armed.
The doubling down and undermining the process certainly added to his punishment. He looks increasingly like a whiny child having a tantrum.
For all it’s glacial slowness and strange people in steange costumes, Parliament seems to have finally caught up with him.
2The-BeardFull MemberI’m just glad there is one episode left of the current run of HIGNFY as I imagine Ian Hislop will be enjoying himself immensely.
As many above have said, he was enabled and emboldened by others who should all be held accountable. And I’d love to think he’s going to destroy them all on the way out through sheer spite but I imagine this is just what he was caught doing – there will be plenty more he’ll be wanting kept quiet. There will be some huffing and puffing but in the end it’ll be in all their interests for it to go away as quickly as possible.
2franksinatraFull MemberI’m not wading back through all the previous pages to check if this has already been posted, so apologies if it has. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-politics-60205873
I’ve seen that clip before but I did not previously notice Thérèse Coffey sat on the floor next to the Speaker looking like she has just rolled in after a big night out. What a mess.
3tjagainFull MemberI bet Johnson will keep on lashing out and dishing any dirt he has – real or imagined. As a narcissist he can never accept he has done any wrong. Its simply impossible for him psychologically. so in his mind he has been unfairly treated by small minded folk out to get him and thus attempting to get revenge is perfectly right and reasonable.
Edit – its classic DARVO
(an acronym for “deny, attack, and reverse victim and offender”) is a reaction that perpetrators of wrongdoing, such as sexual offenders may display in response to being held accountable for their behavior. Some researchers indicate that it is a common manipulation strategy of psychological abusers.
breatheeasyFree MemberIsn’t the oath he took to the committee the equivalent of being in court? Sure I read the perjury was potentially an option, and they seem pretty confident he did.
2binnersFull MemberTheres some Tory MP – David Campbell Bannerman – on Five Live at the moment saying this is a ‘Stalinist’ assault on Democracy
Yes David… Stalin was renowned for withdrawing the parliamentary passes from his enemies as punishment, having gone through a lengthy legal process 🙄
4dissonanceFull MemberSo where will Sunak need to be on Monday when the commons take a democratic vote on whether they agree with the committee or not.
Incidentally Monday is also Johnsons birthday. I think its a far more thoughtful present than a pair of socks.fasthaggisFull MemberIncidentally Monday is also Johnsons birthday. I think its a far more thoughtful present than a pair of socks.
Excellent. 🙂
2martinhutchFull MemberSo where will Sunak need to be on Monday when the commons take a democratic vote on whether they agree with the committee or not.
Poor Zelensky. He really hasn’t got time to hoover and clean the toilets for a ‘surprise visit’ right now.
nickcFull MemberSome of the additional evidence (statements from people working at No10 who witnessed the parties and behaviour) is particularly damning
“Operational notes were sent out from the security team to be mindful of the cameras outside the door, not to out in groups and social distance, it was all pantomime”
crazy-legsFull MemberI think Sunaks tactic is likely to be to change the vote to “note” the results of the committee findings rather than “accept” on the basis Johnson is no longer an MP.
I reckon his tactic will be to find an urgent reason why he needs to be in Ukraine or the US or something!
I’m sure his helicopter pilot is on “wartime scramble” status, ready to swoop in and collect him
1kimbersFull MemberA lot of huffing & puffing from Johnson’s ‘allies’ about abstaining from the vote
Id be surprised if more than just a few frothing loons (especially those in line for a peerage) abstain
anyone that does is condoning both his law breaking, his lying to parliament and his attacks on the parliamentary committee
dissonanceFull MemberId be surprised if more than just a few frothing loons (especially those in line for a peerage) abstain
Surely thats those who werein line for a peerage before Johnson buggered it up.
Slim chance now though.1polyFree MemberIsn’t the oath he took to the committee the equivalent of being in court? Sure I read the perjury was potentially an option, and they seem pretty confident he did.
You can. The committee can instruct the attorney general that they want proceedings to be raised. That might not be a great idea (risk the court disagrees, a massive long court case, even more public money spend arguing whether BJ knew that the events he was photographed at were parties, arguments about being punished twice* etc). It only makes sense to refer to court if the committee itself can not deal with it. People lie in court on a regular basis – usually the defendant – and very often aren’t prosecuted for perjury because they will be punished for the original crime.
*Although I’d be entertained to see Boris referring his case to the ECJ – to raise a Human Rights issue.
tjagainFull MemberFighting like piranha in a pond?
Oh its entertaining. Johnson and co are clearly going to make as much trouble as they can and keep going as long as they can. Dorres byelection likely to be in the Autumn now to overshadow the conference.
the more I read about the report the more damning it is and I love that they added an extra bit about his response to take the theoretical punishment from 10 days suspension to 90 plus losing his HOC pass.
1frankconwayFree Memberbinners – your earlier post re david campbell bannerman…he was interviewed on Newsnight last week and is definitely a fully paid up member of the nutter/headbanger/frothing loon group in tory party.
He’s never been an MP – AFAIK – but was tory MEP; he’s been tory – ukip – tory; was deputy to farage.
Is now chair of the ‘Freedom Alliance’ – whatever that is.
I cannot believe the BBC have had him on two programmes in less than two weeks because he has anything relevant to say; more likely they are linking his headbanger/loon comments with johnson to tar both with the same brush.The-BeardFull MemberJames O’Brien just went off on one about just that:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mwnPwZG1Rno
I can’t embed videos for some reason…
1tjagainFull MemberI cannot believe the BBC have had him on two programmes in less than two weeks because he has anything relevant to say; more likely they are linking his headbanger/loon comments with johnson to tar both with the same brush.
Its the bogus “balance”. They feel the need to have someone supporting Johnsons position if they have someone being sensible. Such a shortage of Johnson supporters now that its the same few headbangers get invited.
this is the poison of the BBCs supposed balance
theotherjonvFree MemberI can’t embed videos for some reason…
On youtube, go to ‘Share’ below the screen window and copy the link that gives you, rather than the address of the video
1theotherjonvFree Membersideline alert but Steph McGovern was on R4 Room 101 with Paul Merton last week (very good, if you want to iPlayer it) and this – or rather Vox pops in general – was one of her proposals. As a TV journalist having to go out to gather opinions on a public matter of the day and trying to find balance, while knowing the only person who could possibly hold a different opinion was the drunk bloke sat on the bench shouting at pigeons.
And so you spend the afternoon desperately asking people what they think, as deadline gets closer for your live to air piece, and of course they all agree with each other because it’s the only sensible opinion to hold. And you just know that finally live on BBC news you’ll be forced to interview him and your career is again going to be reduced to a gif or meme.
We’re getting beyond that level now.
crazy-legsFull MemberEdit: clearly more than enough for one article a day!
https://www.thedailymash.co.uk/politics/i-have-been-victimised-by-my-two-worst-enemies-harriet-harman-and-facts-20230615236413binnersFull MemberThe Boris-supporting senile old racists that make up the Tory membership, no doubt egged on by Ree-Smug, Mad Nad and Co, are now threatening their MPs with deselection if they vote for the report on Monday
There’s more fun and games to come yet.
Who’d bet against an interview with the oversexed honey monster in the Mail on Sunday or the Torygraph with pages of self-pitying, boo-hoo, poor me, ITS SO NOT FAIR bullshit. I’d say it’s nailed on
salad_dodgerFull MemberIs deselection that big a delay given most of them will probably lose their seats at the next election anyway? I’m hoping lots of tories vote to uphold the 90 day suspension and then step down as MP’s immediately.
mattyfezFull MemberWhere’s Rishi? Isn’t he allegedly steering the wheel of this clown car of a government ?
Too scared to rock the boat is my bet. He knows what side his bread is buttered on.
2theotherjonvFree Memberas a committee properly constituted and elected according to Parliament rules, is calling it a kangaroo court not in itself contempt of (an official body of) parliament.
It’s up to the MP’s to decide if the recommended sanctions are correct, and to vote for or against (or abstain) as they think is right, but who further decides if members are allowed to criticise in terms like these? Is it up to someone to report them to the Privileges and Standards committee.
I’d like the speaker to grow a pair (as he might have started to a few weeks back) and invite those that have used such inappropriate language to withdraw it forthwith. When others have to dance around actually calling Johnson’s lies lies, this absolutely doesn’t sit right.
pk13Full MemberJohnathan pie has put the boot in on YouTube it’s a bit naughty so won’t link it
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.