Home › Forums › Chat Forum › 9/11 documentary
- This topic has 1,455 replies, 118 voices, and was last updated 6 years ago by jivehoneyjive.
-
9/11 documentary
-
maxtorqueFull Member
This thread is like the attendees at “The Worlds Biggest Moron Awards” where everyone is out doing each other to be the biggest moron of the night……. 😉
(bonus points for suggestions as to what the award itself is called? Maybe the “NoNeuron Award for utter stupidity in the face of overwhelming idiocy” ?? )
So, the terminally stupid are now suggesting that an apparent lack of debris from the towers proves something. Right, so now not only did the towers fall faster than freefall, during that impossible fall, they somehow also managed to loose there mass as they fell? Right.
In fact, there is ONE POSSIBLE EXPLANATION that fits both those events. Yes, the government was carrying out a top secret “big physics” research project, illegally, in the basement of the WTC complex, which, on the morning of Sept 11, 2001, accidentally and unexpectedly created a BLACK HOLE! And that Black Hole, with effectively infinite mass and gravity, sucked in two passing passenger planes, caused another plane to vear off course and hit the pentagon, pulled down the towers (faster than free fall) and turned Mass in to energy, meaning the debris from the towers was less than the material that made up the towers. Lets be honest, that is a bet fit than most of the CT suggested events we have heard so far, in that at least the physics fits!
Either that or:
GODZILLA!
jonnyboiFull Memberthe top 60 floors of the south tower on the 8th and 9th sept were on a 36 hour power down. fact.
And let’s be clear, that you choose to state this as ‘fact’ is disingenuous in the extreme.
Even if taken at face value it is one unverified statement without supporting evidence made by a single individual. That truthers choose to ignore statements made by multiple witnesses or scientific experts, but jump on ones made by people who appear to be trying to make themselves famous from a national tragedy is rather pathetic.jonnyboiFull Memberstill, a power down took place, which in itself is of interest.
Like, what does that even mean? What could you possibly infer from it?
WhathaveisaidnowFree MemberThat truthers choose to ignore statements made by multiple witnesses or scientific experts, but jump on ones made by people who appear to be trying to make themselves famous from a national tragedy is rather pathetic.
tar (tick) brush (tick)
I’ll admit I failed to do due diligence on that quote, but it would appear there was a power down. And his original quote may still be true and correct, even though he can’t be 100% sure, doesn’t mean he was wrong. I’ll do more research into it.
greatbeardedoneFree MemberI thought that the wtc basement was largely undamaged…didn’t the subway trains run under the wtc remains until they were rerouted.
Werent
there people in the basement who, like the firemen on the third floor, emerged upwards to their astonishment at a lack of debris?As for ‘where did the debris go?’..still doesn’t tally up.
If it was a demolition job. the guys and gals responsible are never going to be short of work…
Couldn’t have been thermite…that burns like a welding arc.
And where is all the glass?
As for the seismic data, there should have been a bigger ‘bang’.
Surely the collapse of all wtc buildings would have cracked the dyke that keeps the river Hudson out?
Like I said,i have yet to read her book (at £60.00 it’s not going to happen anytime soon), so I haven’t completely consumed her kool aid, but she does raise some interesting points.
The radar from the airports confirms that something did fly into towers 1&2.
But not towers 1,2,3,4 ,5, etc.Don’t know if it’s a ‘death ray’ as such, some kind of cold fusion technology?
DracFull MemberI’ll admit I failed to do due diligence on that quote, but it would appear there was a power down. And his original quote may still be true and correct, even though he can’t be 100% sure, doesn’t mean he was wrong.
jonnyboiFull MemberI’ll do more research into it.
More importantly, what are you seeking to infer from it? Let’s just pretend for a second that there was a planned power shutdown from roughly midday Saturday to mid day Sunday. What do you possibly think happened during that period other than electrical maintenance and why?
jonnyboiFull MemberDon’t know if it’s a ‘death ray’ as such, some kind of cold fusion technology?
Yes, it was probably that.
WhathaveisaidnowFree MemberMore importantly, what are you seeking to infer from it? Let’s just pretend for a second that there was a planned power shutdown from roughly midday Saturday to mid day Sunday. What do you possibly think happened during that period other than electrical maintenance and why?
last final check over of course.
greatbeardedoneFree Member“Again, Kim calculated that most of the energy did not reach the ground as seismic waves; it was mainly used up converting steel, concrete—and human beings—to dust. He said the event greatly resembled the energy released by a pyroclastic flow, a lethal explosion of hot gases and debris running down the slopes of an exploding volcano.”
That’s a neat trick, converting an 100 storey building into a pyroclastic flow.
And yet, I can’t find these people in the ‘pyroclastic demolitions’ ‘ section of the phone book.
greatbeardedoneFree MemberI believe that it’s called the ‘Hutchinson effect’
I guess that he’s demonstrated this under scientific conditions…repeatable, etc.Speaking of which, my ice creams melting…
greatbeardedoneFree MemberMight indeed have been death-rays…
Slaine. ‘time-killer’, Rebellion books. 2013.
Pesky diluvials again!
Lol:)
greatbeardedoneFree MemberWhat’s missing is a pile of debris, 300 feet high.
Yes, it’s a quiet night!
WhathaveisaidnowFree MemberAnyone qualified enough on here, who could assess a 46 storey building’s likelihood of collapse, whilst fighting raging fires, and can predict the time of imminent collapse so as to tell, workmen, policeman anyone around to get clear,….please step forward.
it was creaking will not wash. 8)
mikewsmithFree MemberWhathaveisaidnow – Member
Anyone qualified enough on here, who could assess a 46 storey building’s likelihood of collapse, whilst fighting raging fires, and can predict the time of imminent collapse so as to tell, workmen, policeman anyone around to get clear,….please step forward.it was creaking will not wash
Again what you trying to prove here? What is your great conspiracy? What about all the other loose ends that you would have to tie up?sweepyFree MemberAnyone qualified enough on here, who could assess a 46 storey building’s likelihood of collapse,
It’s health and safety gone mad I know, but I’d assess any building that has just been hit by a plane as likely to collapse.
NorthwindFull Membergreatbeardedone – Member
didn’t the subway trains run under the wtc remains until they were rerouted.
No.
To be fair there’s a lot of confusion around here because the WTC “basement” often referred to in damage reports isn’t actually the basement of the towers- it’s a huge construction, essentially a dam, built around the perimeter because it’s just above river level and they had to dig down about 70 feet below river level for the foundations.
This is quite a good image, if you ignore the fact that it’s from a truther website that maintains that the towers were brought down by a nuclear bomb. Shows the subway line (outside the basement) and PATH station (abandoned immediately after the attacks)
sbobFree MemberWhathaveisaidnow – Member
8)
Smiley from the guy who likes to troll over the deaths of thousands of people.
sbobFree MemberWhathaveisaidnow – Member
Anyone qualified enough on here
Why didn’t the intense fires set off the explosives prematurely?
Why didn’t the intense fires burn through the wires of the explosives?What is missing in your life?
BigDummyFree MemberIn fact, there is ONE POSSIBLE EXPLANATION that fits both those events. Yes, the government was carrying out a top secret “big physics” research project, illegally…
I think you’re missing something here. The US government has control of a wide range of alien technology, thought to include the means to achieve faster than light travel and infinite free energy production (if you haven’t watched Dr Steven M Greer‘s excellent documentary about all this, Unacknowledged[/url], then go and do that before commenting, OK, this stuff is serious). It’s not much of a stretch to suggest that they’re covering up the technology to remove mass from buildings. Maybe they wanted to test that technology, and the only way to do it was to secretly destroy the WTC, blame it on the muslims, leave clues to allow people on Youtube to figure out it was actually the work of the sinister network of internationalist jews who control the government and manipulate human destiny for the good of their dimension-shifting reptilian paymasters and that way no one will suspect that it was actually the government secretly testing mass-reducer demolition techniques that have to be kept secret along with the technology of the water-powered car so that humanity can continue to live in a state of technological backwardness that benefits oil companies somehow more than the ability to create limitless free energy would and also David Kelly. Makes you think.
TrekEX8Free MemberI’m not clever enough to work out who’s being ironic, who’s just plain crazy and who’s just so disillusioned and disenfranchised from reality that they have to find a conspiracy to explain away something that was just born out of pure evil.
EdukatorFree MemberThread started by a Brexiter, those suggesting that the towers were brought down by aeroplanes crashing into them are remainers.
jonnyboiFull MemberI believe that it’s called the ‘Hutchinson effect’
I guess that he’s demonstrated this under scientific conditions…repeatable, etc.That’s a video made by a nut job melting a plastic box with a hair dryer. Congratulations
jonnyboiFull MemberAnyone qualified enough on here, who could assess a 46 storey building’s likelihood of collapse, whilst fighting raging fires, and can predict the time of imminent collapse so as to tell, workmen, policeman anyone around to get clear,….please step forward.
it was creaking will not wash.
If you’re talking about WTC 7 the decision to evacuate was made at 3pm and the building didn’t collapse another two hours. So whatever point you’re trying to make. It’s wrong
CharlieMungusFree MemberIt’s health and safety gone mad I know, but I’d assess any building that has just been hit by a plane as likely to collapse.
Well, in that case you’d often be wrong. The impact of the plane was actually quite small compared to the load design
crankboyFree MemberOK I’d assess any building built over a hole close to the place where there have been two magnitude 2 seismic events that is on fire and has been struck by debris from the two largest towers in the world collapsing and also hit by the air/debris being displaced side ways from the collapse and is now bulging and creeking as being an unsafe working environment even for firefighters. I’d pull my firefighters out and warn all around to stay away in the heat of the moment I might even say that building is going to explode or blow to get the severity of the risk across, particularly if I knew it has oil tanks and lots of oil generators for emergency power like what wwt7 had.
piemonsterFree MemberIf you’re talking about WTC 7 the decision to evacuate was made at 3pm and the building didn’t collapse another two hours. So whatever point you’re trying to make. It’s wrong
So the building was empty for hours before collapsing
I don’t know anything about demolition but I reckon that’s enough time to plant the thermal detonators………..
nealgloverFree MemberI don’t know anything about demolition
Stopped reading after this.
Thanks for your input though.
jonnyboiFull MemberI don’t know anything about demolition but I reckon that’s enough time to plant the thermal detonators………..
But where did they land the millennium falcon?
gobuchulFree MemberSo the building was empty for hours before collapsing
I don’t know anything about demolition but I reckon that’s enough time to plant the thermal detonators………..
You have won the internet for today. That’s the post of the thread. 😀
nealgloverFree Memberpoes law
Who knows, impossible to tell with so much crazy in one place.
futonrivercrossingFree MemberThis thread continues to deliver! 😀
i don’t know anything about demolition……….
piemonsterFree MemberWho knows, impossible to tell with so much crazy in one place.
The thing I like about these threads is that you can chuck in a weapon from Star Wars as part of a theory and people aren’t really sure if you’re serious.
DracFull MemberThe thing I like about these threads is that you can chuck in a weapon from Star Wars as part of a theory and people aren’t really sure if you’re serious.
nealgloverFree MemberThe thing I like about these threads is that you can chuck in a weapon from Star Wars as part of a theory and people aren’t really sure if you’re serious.
Indeed. When you consider there was a 1 Watt bulb on the last page claiming that “there wasn’t enough rubble”
Based on the fact that he’d once seen some rubble from a bus window, and it looked bigger. 🙄
jonnyboiFull MemberThis thread does swing between hilarity and despair, that’s for sure
amediasFree MemberI’m now treating it simply as entertainment, and a stark reminder that these people* walk among us…
*you can decide which group you’re more bothered about for yourself
The topic ‘9/11 documentary’ is closed to new replies.