Home Forums Chat Forum 9/11 documentary

Viewing 40 posts - 641 through 680 (of 1,456 total)
  • 9/11 documentary
  • CharlieMungus
    Free Member

    I think you misunderstand my questions. I am merely try to ask you for the data to inform any probabilistic calculations. So when you ask me to provide different modes and mechanisms, you miss the point

    bails
    Full Member

    No ones provided an explanation as to where the debris from the collapse of ALL the wtc towers went.

    I think you’re onto something. Maybe the buildings were never really there to begin with. I mean, have any of you actually SEEN them, with your own eyes?

    Junkyard
    Free Member

    you can even see what looks like small explosions/charges being detonated.

    SHIT the mind control ray guns even got to you

    Clearly they turn to dust you cannot explode DUST that’s why flour mills are so safe !!

    jonnyboi
    Full Member

    Goodness me, is this thread still going?

    Well as regards the commission report, let’s not forget:

    \cut for brevity

    What would you like us to take from that? I fail to see how it undermines any of the previous issues discussed so far.

    Or are you trying to disprove science with politics again.

    At risk of sounding tedious, no one on here has managed to provide an alternative explanation for the events on the day of 9/11 that’s has managed to stand up to the most basic level of scrutiny. Therefore the official explanation remains the only plausible account.

    jonnyboi
    Full Member

    It was obvious no-one was watching the video, I was trying to spark some interest in watching it.

    That’s becuase they are almost always bollocks.

    As I said above, people have picked points from it you quoted at random and refuted them easily. How does that change your view that the video is compelling?

    jonnyboi
    Full Member

    There’s something definitely not quite right about the way they collapse; watch them. You’ll see they fall straight down like a controlled demolition, you can even see what looks like small explosions/charges being detonated.

    Read through the previous 18 pages and you’ll be given all the information you need to see that your assertion is incorrect.

    whatnobeer
    Free Member

    the vitriol displayed on this one insignificant little MTB chat forum towards any form of reasonable scepticism

    Not seen much reasonable scepticism here at all

    maxtorque
    Full Member

    davidtaylforth
    There’s something definitely not quite right about the way they collapse; watch them. You’ll see they fall straight down like a controlled demolition, you can even see what looks like small explosions/charges being detonated.

    Seriously, can we stop with this crap now!

    (buildings fall down when they either are structurally weakened by a controlled demolition, or when they are structurally weakened by fire, impact, corrosion or any other factor) The reason you think it “looks like a controlled demolition” is simply because that is all you have ever seen. How many people have seen a building collapse from anything else? (earth quakes are of course the main thing that knocks down buildings, but those building are not structurally weakened first before the fall down due to massive lateral displacement)

    Obviously stuff gets ejected sideways, principally the air that was inside the building (forming what looks to morons “puffs of dust from explosion” given that what “explosions” actual are is moving pressure waves though, duh, air!

    Consider one tower

    110 floors, 63.5m x 63.5m x 3m per floor, so that’s (approximately) 1.3 Million cubic meters of air in each tower. As the towers fell, that air had to go somewhere. Have a go at moving 1.3M m3 of air in 15 sec, and then tell me “ooh, what a surprise, some stuff got blown around”…..

    Look at the plan, like most high rise buildings, the WTC towers have horizontal floors punctured by lift shafts and stair wells. It’s not in the least bit surprising that air got pushed down the building at high velocity as it collapsed, and when it found a way out (broken windows, broken structure etc) it produced lateral puffs of debris

    jonnyboi
    Full Member

    @maxtorque. The towers were 95% air so yes, there was a fair bit inside the building!

    Incidentally that’s also the reason for the relatively small amount of debris compared to expectation

    bails
    Full Member

    Maxtorque, I can’t tell with some of the others on this thread but I’m pretty sure davidtaylforth isn’t being serious. 😉

    TurnerGuy
    Free Member

    More interesting is the lack of markings on those planes and the extra bits on the underside of the fuselage that were similar to those seen on military remote control planes, and the eye witneses saying no commercial markings :

    go from 2.10

    and at 4.50 where the engine found is from the wrong plane type to be a united flight.

    maxtorque
    Full Member

    And as to the commissions report being “incomplete” that’s because they weren’t asked to report on stupid, impossible or irrelevant claims.

    For example, go read this Hillsbrough tragedy report:

    http://hillsborough.independent.gov.uk/report/%5B/url%5D

    Notice how incomplete that report it. At no point in the report do they even consider the fact that the tragedy was caused by aliens, or another bunch of conspirators! I mean, how lax were the report authors?

    The fact is this: The WTC attack was watched by millions of people, who saw planes hit the towers, the towers burn and collapse. The Report (rightly) was focused on understanding how that occurred, both as an explanation to the events of that terrible day and to see if anything could be learned that could be used in future large building design to mitigate against similar events.

    By starting, encouraging or championing stupid conspiracy theories, those idiotic theorists are rubbing the names of the thousands of innocent victims of the 911 attacked through the mud, and trivializing there deaths……

    mikewsmith
    Free Member

    TurnerGuy – Member
    More interesting is the lack of markings on those planes and the extra bits on the underside of the fuselage that

    Were debunked pages ago, I assume it’s interesting as it implies they either invented the flights or switched them, if so where are the original passengers, how much were air traffic control paid to miss the swap etc. Your looking at tiny details and missing the huge bits you have no answers for.

    Whathaveisaidnow
    Free Member

    the top 60 floors of the south tower on the 8th and 9th sept were on a 36 hour power down. fact. Pretty disruptive for such high profile tennants. The guy who reported this had worked there for 3 years prior and had never had this while he was there, and he asked colleagues who had been there longer and they said the same. Workers in overalls were seen coming and going.

    must just be coincidence. 8)

    davidtaylforth
    Free Member

    Seriously, can we stop with this crap now!

    😀

    Hadn’t been on since Sunday, saw this was up to nineteen pages so presumed we must’ve started from scratch again.

    Thanks for providing an explanation though, I can remove my tin foil hat now 😉

    redsox
    Free Member

    Apart from 9/11 has America ever done any other false flag operations?

    If you believe this sheep worrier, Sandy Hook, Vegas, anywhere there’s been a mass shooting in the last 20 years…….oh, and water makes frogs gay or something

    If any of the “false flags” actually happened, then why let the nutters put forward the ideas?

    RustySpanner
    Full Member

    I’m not reading all that.

    Can someone just provide a list of forum users who believe in this conspiracy theory so I know who to add onto the ‘Completely and utterly hatstand’ list.

    Ta.

    jonnyboi
    Full Member

    and at 4.50 where the engine found is from the wrong plane type to be a united flight.

    No it isn’t, that’s been debunked. Go do some research.

    The rest of the video is crap as well.

    Whathaveisaidnow
    Free Member

    if so where are the original passengers

    1) landed elsewhere and killed/or given the option to live with a new identity and a big wedge of cash on the condition they always keep their mouth shut or death would ensue. Entirely possible.

    …on this, if this did happen? if you were in their situation, would you have chosen instant death?

    davidtaylforth
    Free Member

    Hmm, that’s strange.

    slowoldman
    Full Member

    Workers in overalls? Wow.

    davidtaylforth
    Free Member

    Anyone care to explain?

    jonnyboi
    Full Member

    the top 60 floors of the south tower on the 8th and 9th sept were on a 36 hour power down. fact.

    Incorrect, and debunked. You do know the observation deck was open dont you?

    You can’t be a truther by repeating lies

    neilwheel
    Free Member

    Most of the buildings collapsed into the multi-story basement that extended across the entire plaza, not just under each building. You only have to look at photos of the cleared site and compare those to the plan photos of the site with building and plaza outlines overlaid.

    Judy Wood is some very kind of special, although there is a rumour that she was the CIA chief LSD tester back in the good old days.

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    If any of the “false flags” actually happened, then why let the nutters put forward the ideas?

    They are False False Flags, to get people used to the idea that False Flag claims are false, so that discoveries of actual False Flags are not believed.

    😉

    mikewsmith
    Free Member

    1) landed elsewhere and killed/or given the option to live with a new identity and a big wedge of cash on the condition they always keep their mouth shut or death would ensue. Entirely possible.

    …on this, if this did happen? if you were in their situation, would you have chosen instant death?
    So we are now adding in bus drives, documents makers and about 1000 people who have just appeared on Sep 12th who will have finger prints and dna on file who will have no previous medical records etc. None of them have made contact with their families, none have gone to wiki leaks. A simple donation test from a family member would prove this so only 1 is needed to come forward.

    Anyway you just increased your conspiracy membership to a couple of thousand at least. How much is a lifetime of silence worth?

    The words entirely possible are probably true. The chance of it happening and being kept secret all these years is near in impossible. You would assume all these people are in some sort of watch list in case they make a run for it but they never appear in the snowdon files etc.

    CountZero
    Full Member

    TurnerGuy – Member
    More interesting is the lack of markings on those planes and the extra bits on the underside of the fuselage that were similar to those seen on military remote control planes, and the eye witneses saying no commercial markings :

    Ok, identify any commercial aircraft flying at full speed, in bright light, from a glimps of a second or two. I live under a number of flight-paths of commercial air traffic, and even fairly low and slow-flying planes are almost impossible to identify by eye, without binoculars, and the video footage taken of the 9/11 aircraft will be of pretty low resolution by modern standards, with sunlight reflecting from smooth, shiny surfaces any carrier markings will be to all and intents and purposes impossible to identify.
    And why, exactly, would these hypothetical ‘drone’ airliners have ‘extra bits’ on the underside of the fuselage?
    After all, there’s an entire, empty passenger compartment that can be filled with any damned thing, why stick something on the outside? The only similar aircraft that do are military versions of civilian aircraft that are used for ELINT operations, or forwards fire control, and they’re far too valuable to be used for something like this.
    Which brings us back to a remote control ‘drone’, which then begs the question, what happened to the original commercial airliners and the several hundred people in them?
    Sorry, but I’ve always considered you to be one of the most rational and considered thinkers on here, I truly can’t believe you take this conspiracy bullshit seriously!

    greatbeardedone
    Free Member

    But where did all the debris from the wtc buildings go?

    Notice the ambulance parked outside the lobby of wtc 1. Completely undamaged.

    The testimony of the fdny workers who had been trapped on level three doesn’t make sense, or maybe they were extremely lucky.
    97? floors, fixtures, fittings, desks, filing cabinets and porcelain loos came crashing down on top of them, but they emerged (much to their amazement), to a clear blue sky.

    I know nothing about demolishing tower blocks, but I once took the bus past the remains of a skinny 30 storey tower block, and the debris was stacked pretty high.

    The collapse of the wtc buildings hardly moved the seismograph. Looked more like a bout of mass flatulence.

    neilwheel
    Free Member

    greatbeardedone – Member

    But where did all the debris from the wtc buildings go?

    I’ll quote myself as you can’t be bothered to read posts.

    neilwheel – Member

    Most of the buildings collapsed into the multi-story basement that extended across the entire plaza, not just the space under each building. You only have to look at photos of the cleared site and compare those to the plan photos of the site with building and plaza outlines overlaid and apply some logic.

    Judy Wood is some very kind of special, although there is a rumour that she was the CIA chief LSD tester back in the good old days.

    slowoldman
    Full Member

    The collapse of the wtc buildings hardly moved the seismograph

    Which shows what?

    davidtaylforth
    Free Member

    I know nothing about demolishing tower blocks, but I once took the bus past the remains of a skinny 30 storey tower block, and the debris was stacked pretty high.

    A lot of the WTC was made from glass, which as we know is transparent, and is difficult to see unless it catches the light at a certain angle. I guess when you’ve seen it on TV/Youtube, the light hasn’t been shining correctly.

    jonnyboi
    Full Member

    The collapse of the wtc buildings hardly moved the seismograph. Looked more like a bout of mass flatulence.

    Interesting, seismologists have provided some useful insight into the events of 9/11 but I don’t believe they ever suggested the data was incorrect. What would you have expected to see and why?

    whitestone
    Free Member

    Just over magnitude 2 according to This piece[/url]

    neilwheel
    Free Member

    The point about the seismograph reading is another “fact” supporting the “giant death ray vaporized the towers” argument.

    Junkyard
    Free Member

    I guess this thread is one way to out the forum loons

    if this did happen? if you were in their situation, would you have chosen instant death?

    No but that “fact” in no way proves that this scenario did indeed happen

    Lets put it another way
    if this did happen and you were in their situation, would you have chosen to NEVER EVER come fwd or ever contact your family ever again would every single pne of the people involved in this have done so? You think that is credible that none of them with kids, wives, partners parents ever wanted to speak to them ever again – dont be so daft. What next did the MIB use that pen thing on them?
    FFS this is **** ludicrous debate

    They are False False Flags, to get people used to the idea that False Flag claims are false, so that discoveries of actual False Flags are not believed.

    This is a blatant false false flag therby proving your point 😉

    mrlebowski
    Free Member

    Corner shop is out of biscuits – sorry….

    I got doughnuts instead, I hope that’s ok?

    Whathaveisaidnow
    Free Member

    Incorrect, and debunked. You do know the observation deck was open dont you?

    You can’t be a truther by repeating lies

    I meant 7th & 8th… not 9th if the debunking exists please show it.

    neilwheel
    Free Member

    Dicks gonna dick!

    Enjoy your doh-nuts.

    jonnyboi
    Full Member

    I meant 7th & 8th… not 9th if the debunking exists please show it.

    The guy who made the unverified statement did it himself.

    GW: How do you know that there was no electricity from floor 50 up, if Fiduciary Trust was on much higher floors — starting at the 90th floor?

    SF: I can’t absolutely verify that there was no power on lower floors … all I can validate is that we were informed of the power down condition, that we had to take down all systems and then the following day had to bring back up all systems .

    Whathaveisaidnow
    Free Member

    I guess this thread is one way to out the forum loons

    if this did happen? if you were in their situation, would you have chosen instant death?
    No but that “fact” in no way proves that this scenario did indeed happen
    Lets put it another way
    if this did happen and you were in their situation, would you have chosen to NEVER EVER come fwd or ever contact your family ever again would every single pne of the people involved in this have done so? You think that is credible that none of them with kids, wives, partners parents ever wanted to speak to them ever again – dont be so daft. What next did the MIB use that pen thing on them?
    FFS this is **** ludicrous debate

    still, a power down took place, 2 people have confirmed this, the extent of which is a little up in the air,…. coming so soon prior to the collapses, which in itself is of interest.

Viewing 40 posts - 641 through 680 (of 1,456 total)

The topic ‘9/11 documentary’ is closed to new replies.