The law you say? Basically, you’re banged to rights sunshine. Go back around with a grovelling apology, a bottle of whisky and a fair few quid… And keep your bloody dogs under control next time 👿
Under the Dogs (Protection of Livestock) Act 1953 the owner and anyone else who is in control the dog at the time will be guilty of a criminal offence if it worries livestock on agricultural land. “Livestock” includes cattle, sheep, goats, swine, horses and poultry.
There is no right to shoot a dog under this Act if it attacks livestock merely that the person in control of the dog has committed an offence. But you’re ok, as the maximum fine is restricted to a mere £1,000.
Also worth noting, however, there is the Animals Act 1971 under which there is a defence available to someone who is the subject of civil
proceedings for killing or injuring a dog that was worrying or about to worry livestock.
A person shooting a dog without lawful excuse may commit the offence of criminal damage, however, Section 5 of the Criminal Damage Act 1971 recognises that a person cannot stand idly by and watch his property being destroyed. A person will have lawful excuse to damage or
destroy property (a dog) belonging to another if he was doing it to protect his own property, provided that his property was in immediate
need of protection and the means used to defend it were reasonable.
So all things considered, it’s hardly surprising the owner of the chicken was looking for a proper argument!! I would have been too!!