Home › Forums › Chat Forum › U.S. Presidential Election 2020
- This topic has 5,512 replies, 363 voices, and was last updated 3 years ago by inkster.
-
U.S. Presidential Election 2020
-
martinhutchFull Member
The US President says it’s coming any day now, so I think we’re good on that.
Along with a Health Plan, Mexico Wall, North Korean Peace Deal, Economic Recovery…
scuttlerFull MemberUntil they have successfully showed that the vaccine works no claims can be believed.
I R O N Y O V E R L O A D
tpbikerFree MemberUntil they have successfully showed that the vaccine works no claims can be believed.
Hang about..are you saying trump may be lying?
chestrockwellFull Member(Back to the Robocop scene), you can still buy a Blaupunkt car stereo that the hostage negotiator threw in to sweeten the deal. Mega!
Was going to mention the same, they were very desirable back in the 90’s.
I was dragged around B&M by my wife the other day and noticed they have a range of Blaupunkt branded kettles, toasters etc. I spent the rest of the trip telling myself that if I let the mayor go I’d even throw in a Blaupunkt.
That is all, back to the election…..
DaffyFull MemberThat is a strong assumption about finding vaccine.
AstraZeneca and Fauci were saying that March is likely. China and Russia already have vaccines in use with a claimed effectiveness of between 60 and 70%. They’re still in phase 3, but are accessible to the public.
mattyfezFull MemberThe question is no longer how dysfunctional they are but whether he has the guts to do things so drastically different to get the economy turning for good.
That would depend on winning the Senate too, as with a split house, any president is basically a lame duck.
What trump has done, is opened up insolvent and environmentally damaging industries to create some short term jobs in things like coal mining and fracking. Just smoke and mirrors, nothing sustainable.
chewkwFree MemberHang about..are you saying trump may be lying?
It is not about what they authority says but rather if people/I trust their assumption.
Many (some foreign news) have claimed that China has found the vaccine but do you trust them and similarly do you trust that what the USA says?
That would depend on winning the Senate too, as with a split house, any president is basically a lame duck.
That’s also one reason that any new president is only going to rough ride during this period, but I guess Biden wants it before he is “too” old to become one.
What trump has done, is opened up insolvent and environmentally damaging industries to create some short term jobs in things like coal mining and fracking. Just smoke and mirrors, nothing sustainable.
His focus is to strengthen the economy and deal with the rest later.
docrobsterFree MemberMany (some foreign news) have claimed that China has found the vaccine
I enrolled in the vaccine trial in May and had a dose of what was either meningitis or sars-cov2 vaccine in June. No one has found a vaccine, vaccine has been developed using presumably standard vaccine development techniques. We will know in about another 6 months whether the vaccine is effective (or more accurately, how effective it is) and how safe it is, whether booster doses will be needed for prolonged immunity etc etc.
How any politician in any country thinks they can take credit for this is laughable. It’s happened because science, and despite trump bojo and all the other antiscience idiots who have some how got voted into office.
SuperficialFree MemberMany (some foreign news) have claimed…
Because it’s you, and because you’ve actually started talking like Trump: citation required.
…that China has found the vaccine but do you trust them and similarly do you trust that what the USA says?
No, I don’t trust the Chinese government on this, because their regime is very secretive, and such information is closely guarded. However, they have a hugely powerful biotech industry so I can certainly believe they have made good progress with a vaccine.
Do I believe American establishments like the CDC, JAMA, NEJM, Fauci (and others like WHO / SAGE etc)? Yes, of course. Their whole life’s work is to deal with this sort of thing. They’re experts in their field so of course I’d listen to what they have to say. Do I believe the charlatan in the White House? No, of course not. He’s a powerful man for sure, he has his hands on the levers of the USA. But at this stage does anyone believe he has insight into anything?
docrobsterFree MemberWell I suppose China will be first with the vaccine… after all they manufactured this virus, no?🤔😉
FuzzyWuzzyFull MemberWhoever wins will have a rough presidential ride for few years.
True enough
That’s why I say Biden is not a very bright person wanting to become President during the pandemic or possible world economic downturn.
Time isn’t on Biden’s side – I don’t think he can afford to wait until 2024 even if he wanted to. For someone that’s spent their life as a politician I’m guessing he’d prefer to be a President during troubled times than go to the grave having only even been VP
Getting Biden to turn the world economy around then good luck to you as you will find out if he is in power.
It remains to be seen how, in 2024, people will attribute blame for much of the pandemic fallout. If the Dems can control both Houses for 4 years and get quite a bit done they can probably do a good job of of separating pandemic pain caused by Trump incompetence/politicisation and that caused in general by global economic downturn etc. I’m sure they’ll be able to say “it would have been so much worse without Biden’s leadership, just look what happened with the UK and Boris running things…”.
Possibly Biden might seek a second term (assuming he even gets a first one) but that’s a long way off being something to be concerned about, even if you’re Joe Biden.
cromolyollyFree MemberThat would depend on winning the Senate too, as with a split house, any president is basically a lame duck.
Not really. President s have executive order power which is surprisingly broad.
The Senate and Congress need 2/3 majorities to overturn a presidential veto so a majority in one or both is fine as long as it isn’t a 2/3rds majority. That’s hard to achieve because only 1/3 of congress is elected in any given cycle. Where gridlock happens is when the Senate and Congress have different majorities.JamzeFull MemberShe didn’t say who though…
"Under every circumstance our campaign believes that tonight will be a landslide” – @PressSec
Bold prediction, but she may be right …
— Jonathan Karl (@jonkarl) November 3, 2020
piemonsterFree MemberThey are on the money but, especially by this point in the game they’ve left probability behind.
P-JayFree MemberIn regards to Vaccines, and this is probably the wrong thread, but Covid thread has gotten a bit feral.
A vaccine does exist, it does produce an immune response in both old and young adults. The vaccine also triggers lower adverse responses among the elderly.
MHRA (who govern new drugs in the UK) have recently started an accelerated review of the AstraZeneca vaccine using live data from their phase 3 trials which are likely to conclude within weeks.
Source: https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-health-coronavirus-astrazeneca-vaccin-idUSKBN27H1BD
Based on recent findings in regards to antibodies and T-cells, I’d guess the vaccine will likely be effective for around 6 months, so it’s likely to be a annual vaccination as we do now with flu.
I’d say it probably won’t be enough to eradicate it, although it might well contribute to eradication if indeed that ever happens.
Bringing this back to The US Election, Pfizer who are trying to produce the US’s front running vaccine at the moment, are also in Phase 3, a few weeks behind the UK. They have stated that they won’t be ready to apply for FDA approval until the 3rd week of November, many have said that this was a move to discredit Trump, asking for FDA approval will be massive news and a major stepping stone towards ending the Covid crisis, and holding off until after the election would obviously hurt Trump who’d been promising a Vaccine for months, but I think the truth is more down to earth, they’re “moving at the speed of science” and with 900+ American’s dying every day and rising , delaying even 3 weeks to snub Trump would potentially cost 20k+ lives.
Source:
https://www.pfizer.com/news/hot-topics/an_open_letter_from_pfizer_chairman_and_ceo_albert_bourla
alcoleponeFree MemberI dont bet, but have put £10 on trump…I don’t want him to win, but if he does, there’s something to cheer me up slightly.
cromolyollyFree Member@stwhannah – there was one blog I read and a guy who did a podcast which were fairly non-rabid. I’ll see if I can find them again.
According to this, there aren’t many left.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-there-are-so-few-moderate-republicans-left/
I think to some degree you’ve answered your own question. Older rich white dudes used to vote republican because they were the party of small govt (i.e. free choice ) and low taxes, so they still do. Appeals for obvious reasons. Free market idealogues ditto. Anti socialist ditto. It goes on. They don’t really care that Trump is supported by poor white dudes because they think he’s going to cut off all the rich white dudes from the gov’t money they’ve been getting in shady ways. He’s a republican in name. There are only 2 parties so it’s a forced choice. You live with what you don’t like about the party because if what you do. You’d rather have your lot in charge than the others. Some of that you can attribute to the history of the US, from the revolution (freedom from and fear of tyranny – democrats believe in bigger govt which is moving closer to tyranny). States rights, etc etc. It’s a deep rabbit hole. It’s also largely BS. Republican Presidents, Congress and Senate have raised taxes, expanded govt etc almost as much as Democrats. The system is so bent and built around horsemtrading that ideology is more an idea than a reality.
Interesting that there are a lot of moderate republicans for Biden. Goes back to the article I linked
stwhannahFull Member@thols2 thanks for the podcast recommendation – but I guess they’re the ones that see what I see!
@chromolyolly I get the self interest, but there comes a point where even the guy saying ‘I’ll make you rich’ becomes so objectionable that surely the greater good kicks in? The assault on democracy and decency is astounding.
I hope like hell that Biden gets this. But if he does, what happens until inauguration in January? What’s to stop Trump throwing a tantrum?
And, what about all Trump’s facilitators? Will there be some kind of national shame introspection on what they let happen, or will it all be drawing battle lines for the next election?
Scary times.
eddiebabyFree MemberScary times.
Indeed. But add in the fact that if Joe wins our post Brexit US trade deal gets a lot harder to sort and it gets even more scary.
rollindoughnutFree MemberBiden’s said his major goals are to restore international relations, re-sign to the Paris treaty and pursue alternatives to fossil fuels.
That’s good enough for me.cromolyollyFree Memberly I get the self interest, but there comes a point where even the guy saying ‘I’ll make you rich’ becomes so objectionable that surely the greater good kicks in
Trump is a symptom, not the problem. If you go back before him, as far as republicans were concerned the greater good was the broad republican values of smaller government, lower taxes, more choice, less socialism. The details were not as important. So as long as in theory that was happening, they could overlook a lot (think fake WMDs, trickle down economics etc etc.).
The change in republican voters means no one really knows what the greater good they stand for is anymore, including them.And, what about all Trump’s facilitators? Will there be some kind of national shame introspection on what they let happen, or will it all be drawing battle lines for the next election?
Both? Lynsey Graham (he of the we shouldn’t elect a supreme court judge in a presidents last year and you can quote me on that – what? Don’t know what you are talking about) is getting killed in fundraising by his dem opponent. He is literally begging for money. Hopefully that translates to a big loss in the election. Guys like Ted Cruz will hang around like a bad smell and lead the revolution against socialism.
SuperficialFree MemberAnd, what about all Trump’s facilitators? Will there be some kind of national shame introspection on what they let happen, or will it all be drawing battle lines for the next election?
Not a chance IMHO. The Reps are doubling down on the ‘unfair election’ nonsense. Inwardly I think they will realise that Trump was a bad move, but only because he’s uneducated, crass and unhinged. He can’t play the GOP puppet role they needed because he’s slightly too far gone for them. Crucially NOT because they disagree with his main policies.
If they do lose this evening, they’ll absolutely be back with a more polished version of the same fake-news-spewing, internet-troll-luring thing in 4 years.
grumFree MemberThe GOP won’t retreat from Trumpism if Trump loses, according to this
I think you have to remember in the US the economy doing well is so important because without jobs and pension plans doing well people are totally screwed. Being scared of destitution is pretty powerful, and Trump gave the economy a shot in the arm by allowing drilling in national parks and removing environmental regulations etc and claimed he would bring back manufacturing jobs.
Obviously some might suggest you could create a proper safety net and free healthcare so people aren’t so terrified, but that would be unamerican!
stwhannahFull MemberJust read this via the Lincoln Project: https://thebulwark.com/to-my-fellow-george-w-bush-supporters/
This is the kind of moral introspection I’d like to see more of. Not that I’d argue that GWB was a saint, and what might the world have looked like if Gore had taken office, but at least GWB was on a different scale to Trump.
eyestwiceFree MemberDo I believe American establishments like the CDC, JAMA, NEJM, Fauci (and others like WHO / SAGE etc)? Yes, of course. Their whole life’s work is to deal with this sort of thing. They’re experts in their field so of course I’d listen to what they have to say. Do I believe the charlatan in the White House? No, of course not. He’s a powerful man for sure, he has his hands on the levers of the USA. But at this stage does anyone believe he has insight into anything?
Couldn’t have put it better myself. I would add some opinionated gumpf about Trump supporters being idiots who watch Fox, never read alternative views, believe in QAnon, never went to school yet alone college and own too many firearms than should be allowed for their incredibly low level of intelligence.
But I won’t say that as I’ll get flamed. I despair.
Long live China. I say that so that they don’t hunt me down when they become the new superpower.
Trump has offered them so much opportunity and should he stay in power then I welcome the rise of the
CybermenChinese.cromolyollyFree MemberThe Lincoln Project are an interesting bunch. Republicans who hate Trump. I think they think that if they get rid of Trump they can have their party back. A lot of them are former advisors to the party and or presidents.
I don’t think the party as they remember it is ever coming back. So they are going to be outsiders for a long time.
DrJFull MemberOn the bright side, if Trump wins we won’t be troubled by American elections any more.
alpinFree MemberYOUNG MAN, there’s no need to feel down!” Never underestimate this ****. Let’s hope Trump loses properly this month.
This.
chewkwFree MemberTrump has offered them so much opportunity and should he stay in power then I welcome the rise of the
CybermenChinese.😆 you mean drones? They don’t have Cybermen there.
First test is to eat stewed chicken feet and boiled pig offals, both of which are delicacies, then report back if you can handle that.
dissonanceFull MemberThe Lincoln Project are an interesting bunch
Whilst their current work is entertaining they really are part of the problem. They spent years practicing the partisan warfare and attack ads setting the scene for Trump only to complain once he took it one step further.
Without them I doubt he would have got in place.cromolyollyFree MemberThe Lincoln Project guys didn’t have a lot to do with the rise of populism, which is largely behind Trump
They do play fast and dirty though. A guy vaguely connected to them was asked about the Supreme Court. He said the Dems still don’t get it. If it were the other way round, they would pack the court with as many of the youngest judges they could get away with. Biden said he’d study the issue.
NorthwindFull MemberDaffy
Full MemberNot true – They’ll inherit a vaccine and a solution in January-March. Just like Trump inherited Obama’s economic recovery, healthcare plan, trade deals, veteran support and tried to build upon it and say it was all his doing.
Eh, that’s really not the case. Even if a vaccine does arrive, it’s not something that the next president inherits from this one, because that implies that the current one has had a hand in making it happen. All the other things you listed were genuine products of the Obama presidency, but a covid vaccine assuming it arrives won’t be a product of Trump, it’ll be something that largely happened at the same time as him.
funkrodentFull MemberAll the other things you listed were genuine products of the Obama presidency, but a covid vaccine assuming it arrives won’t be a product of Trump, it’ll be something that largely happened at the same time as him.
Too true. Despite, not because of!
In truth, if/when they do have a credible vaccine, it’ll be because ‘The Scientists’ resisted his apparatchiks’ attempts to get them to fast track something not yet fully developed, let alone fully tested.
Worth bearing in mind that the potential vaccines that are currently being talked about seem to be 70-80% effective (not to mention for approx 6 months). If vaccine take up is 50% (which seems to be a number touted in the US), then 70% of 50% means approx 1/3 population immune. Which isn’t close to being enough.
All the more reason to vote the doubt sowing, wig wearing, honey monster out of office!
slowoldmanFull MemberBut add in the fact that if Joe wins our post Brexit US trade deal gets a lot harder to sort
I don’t think that’s necessarily the case. He will be keen for us to maintain a sensible trading link with the EU which might knock some sense into the pea brains we have running the show.
The topic ‘U.S. Presidential Election 2020’ is closed to new replies.