Home › Forums › Chat Forum › The effect of a Scottish Yes vote on the rest of the UK?
- This topic has 517 replies, 114 voices, and was last updated 10 years ago by konabunny.
-
The effect of a Scottish Yes vote on the rest of the UK?
-
scruff9252Full Member
One possible outcome a few years down the line;
England “We’re thirsty and there is another drought on”
Scotland “Well, we can sell you some water if you like. £10 a litre please”richcFree MemberOne possible outcome a few years down the line;
England “We’re thirsty and there is another drought on”
Scotland “Well, we can sell you some water if you like. £10 a litre please”How exactly will you pump it though? As when Scotland switches off its nuclear reactors isn’t there an energy deficit?
Plus think of the import tax as you will be outside the EU 🙂
jonbaFree MemberWhat tyres for leaping Hadrian’s Wall in Steve McQueen Great Escape style? (From England to Free Scotland.)
You’d probably want something fairly fast rolling, maybe a CX tyre as you’d have a good bit of riding to do once you landed to reach the border. Semi slick in summer or an intermediate in winter. Once you’ve landed you would be best joining the NCN route 68 and riding up to Kielder then over the border at Bloody Bush. You could take the A68 but I think you’d get stopped more easily on the main high way.
BoardinBobFull MemberMeanwhile he is the only leader in the UK that actually achieved a majority in a recent election
He may have got a majority of seats, but the majority of the electorate didn’t vote for him. That’s funny given how much the Yes campaign bangs on about Scotland have a government in Westminster that they didn’t vote for.
In the 2011 Scottish Parliamentary election the SNP won 53.49% of the seats but only 44.04% of the voters actually voted for them.
hilldodgerFree MemberBiscuit Powered – Member
God I envy the Scots…..
up sticks and move then, you only have to live there to be one 😆
jambalayaFree MemberAS constantly refer to the Westminster elite and he includes Milliband in this. Cameron knows he’s too easy a target for AS’s jibes at the “privileged English” who run the UK, hence he’s kept a low profile. All three party leaders are coming up as its a show of unity, an attempt to send the message that the UK as a whole no matter of it’s political colour would prefer Scotland to remain as part of the Union.
I remain staggered that whilst the UK sees that independence would be bad for us economically the Yes supporters are happy to ignore the reality that it’s worse for them.
@scruff there is plenty of water in Wales
@Biscuit, you get the chance to change the Westminster mob every 5 years or so. EDIT: Or follow @hilldodgers excellent advice 😀
thv3Free MemberIf its a Yes vote, I wonder how long it will be before some people (buses, small business etc) start rejecting Scottish notes…….. My money is on not long
This can’t be serious? Already happens and has been happening for years, despite being pounds sterling.
mudsharkFree MemberIn some cases it happens now. Maybe the banks will say you have to change them into UKP and pay commission?
BiscuitPoweredFree Member@Biscuit, you get the chance to change the Westminster mob every 5 years or so. EDIT: Or follow @hilldodgers excellent advice
Well, not really. I get to play a part in choosing which colour tie they wear, but I’m not silly enough to believe that there is any other difference. They all answer to the city of London. What the city wants the city gets, even to everyone else’s detriment. Otherwise the sky will fall in etc.
aracerFree MemberYou reckon it will be any different with Scotland and their big business? (I was going to write “financial sector”, but then remembered it’s all leaving)
dragonFree MemberIt’ll be worse, the smaller the country the more big business can push you around. And remember Alex’s policies are deliberately aimed at attracting tax shy corporations, so SNP policy is ‘worse’ than Westminster’s when it come to business tax.
BiscuitPoweredFree MemberMaybe. Maybe not.
But if I was a Scot I would be happy to shake things up and take the chance. Seems like I’m not alone.
dazhFull MemberIt’ll be worse, the smaller the country the more big business can push you around.
Indeed. Why they’d want to leave a nation where the government leads the world in courageously standing up to big corporations is anyone’s guess.
bencooperFree MemberWe need change, this is a change, let’s do it?
We need change, this is the only change we’ll be able to achieve in a very long time, it’s worth a go.
dragonFree MemberNo sensible government will stand up to corporations, sensible governments work with them. Remember corporations keep the lights on and pay the bills. The NHS is nothing without corporations providing the power, computers, scanners, pumps, drugs, food, beds etc. Ultimately the best countries are the ones where private and public work together.
GotamaFree MemberCredit Suisse’s number crunchers seems to think going it alone may not be the best move but it is all just economic theory/guesswork so attribute as much credit as you choose….
Risk of an economic crisis: In our opinion Scotland would fall into a deep recession. We believe deposit flight is both highly likely and highly problematic (with banks assets of 12x GDP) and should the BoE move to guarantee Scottish deposits, we expect it to extract a high fiscal and regulatory price (probably insisting on a primary budget surplus). The re-domiciling of the financial sector and UK public service jobs, as well as a legal dispute over North Sea oil, would further accelerate any downturn. In our opinion, as North Sea oil production slows, we estimate that the non-oil economy would need a 10% to 20% devaluation to restore competitiveness. This would require a 5% to 10% fall in wages, driven by a steep rise in unemployment.
dazhFull MemberYou’re right. If it wasn’t for all these corporations price fixing and paying next to no tax we’d all be a lot poorer and public services would be much worse.
(I really can’t be arsed arguing properly about stuff like this in the face of such transparent acceptance of the status quo)
dragonFree MemberWhat price fixing, there is very little evidence of any. As for avoiding paying tax the SNP policy is aimed at encouraging that. The SNP is a very right wing party when it comes to corporation tax. Sure an iScotland might vote in another party but then when Grangemouth and the like start saying they’ll fold unless more money is given to them, what do you think will happen?
I think things could be improved for the whole of the UK, but I don’t see an iScotland having the answers. A whole UK has more power together than apart.
dazhFull MemberWhat price fixing, there is very little evidence of any.
One for a different thread perhaps but I’d start you off with energy and fuel prices. And then there’s the stuff like construction companies colluding on competing bids for public contracts. I’ve no particular problem with companies paying less tax if that’s government policy, but just allowing them to randomly evade/avoid tax is altogether different.
yourguitarheroFree MemberYes, the whole UK has more power than Scotland on its own.
It’s a question of who that power is used to benefit.Say the UK has 100 power:benefit units and Scotland has 10. (maybe drop to 9 after independence?)
But only 8 of the UK’s powerz (units – whatevah!) benefit Scotland.Going it alone means Scotland receives more powerz!!!!!!!!!!!!!
david47Free MemberI’m looking forward to a yes vote, then we can get on with the time zone change, getting in more evening cycling/drinking time in the sun 🙂
whatnobeerFree MemberI’m looking forward to a yes vote, then we can get on with the time zone change, getting in more evening cycling/drinking time in the sun
Surprised Better Together hasn’t latched on to that one. “Independence will mean darker mornings! Think of the children!! ”
brooessFree MemberWhat’s the chance of this scenario:
1. Yes wins
2. The negotiations start. Likely to be messy but eventually come out with an agreement – e.g. currency, division of the debt, division of oil reserves.
3. rUK says, as this impacts the English, Northern Irish and Welsh wealth and prosperity (at a time when the future looks very uncertain), we think it should go to a referendum – as a condition of accepting the deal.This is quite likely if there’s any doubt rUK will lose out in the deal – as the voters would go mental if Westminster appeared to be giving away more than we felt was fair or reasonable…
We could end up in endless debates and referenda for the next 5 years… massive lack of certainty which in itself could drag us all down the pan…
whatnobeerFree MemberYou’d end up in this weird situation where on one hand annoyed rUK voters wouldn’t want rid of Scotland as it would cost them but they wouldn’t want to keep it as they think it’s a resource drain. Similar to the immigrants stealing our jobs whilst also sitting around all day on benefits.
mudsharkFree MemberSimilar to the immigrants stealing our jobs whilst also sitting around all day on benefits.
Maybe some do one and some do the other? Crazy immigrants.
dazhFull MemberThis is quite likely if there’s any doubt rUK will lose out in the deal – as the voters would go mental if Westminster appeared to be giving away more than we felt was fair or reasonable…
…and Scotland goes it alone, keeps the oil, leave the rUK with the debt, and establishes it’s own currency or attempts to join the euro which the rUK vetos. As others have said, if the rUK doesn’t like them leaving, there’s nothing they can do about it, it’s their choice. Short of a military occupation there’s no way of forcing them to remain as part of the UK, English referendums or not, so the rUK has the choice of being grown up about it and getting the best deal possible, or it can throw it’s dummy out of the pram.
somewhatslightlydazedFree MemberWhat’s the chance of this scenario:
1. Yes wins
2. The negotiations start. Likely to be messy but eventually come out with an agreement – e.g. currency, division of the debt, division of oil reserves.
3. rUK says, as this impacts the English, Northern Irish and Welsh wealth and prosperity (at a time when the future looks very uncertain), we think it should go to a referendum – as a condition of accepting the deal.I think 2. is more likely to result in some sort of fudged compromise where no one is particularly happy but all the politicians, of whatever persuasion, can proclaim a “victory” and that they were right all along.
aracerFree Member…and Scotland goes it alone, keeps the oil, leave the rUK with the debt, and establishes it’s own currency or attempts to join the euro which the rUK vetos.
…has no tax and revenue system, no vehicle and driver licensing…
dazhFull Member..has no tax and revenue system, no vehicle and driver licensing…
I’m sure they’re capable of setting this up. They do have bureaucrats up there you know!
brooessFree MemberMy point is: Scotland can’t just become independent without a few key things being agreed with rUK – for e.g. Scotland can’t just take all the oil just because they’d like to – any split has to be agreed with rUK first.
So an overall proposal of these key things has to be negotiated. Right now I think we’re all assuming the Scottish parliament and rUK parliament will just agree these between them.
My point is that if rUK electorate feel this isn’t in our best interests, we’ll demand a referendum (or the current government will offer one so they don’t get voted out).
I can’t see how the Scottish parliament could stop the rUK parliament offering a referendum to its electorate.. but if we don’t like the look of the split, we’ll vote against and we’ll be back right where we are, having endured years of stress and uncertainty which will likely have reduced investment and therefore economic growth…
dazhFull MemberYes the rUK could have a (highly unlikely) referendum to accept a deal. But if it voted no what would it change? It’s not going to force them to remain in the UK. It might delay things a bit, but Scotland would simply walk away and go it alone.
Right now I think we’re all assuming the Scottish parliament and rUK parliament will just agree these between them.
I think we’re all assuming that the two governments will act in a manner befitting two mature nations who are at peace and have the best interests of both at heart. The alternative is rather horrifying.
brooessFree Memberbut Scotland would simply walk away and go it alone.
But with what share of the debt, what share of the oil, with what currency?
None of these things can be unilaterally decided by either Scotland or rUK governments – they’re currently shared resources and will have to be allocated under a formal agreement between both sides…
dazhFull MemberBut with what share of the debt, what share of the oil, with what currency?
None of these things can be unilaterally decided by either Scotland or rUK governments
Of course it can unilaterally decide to go it alone without accepting any of the debt, setting up it’s own currency, and claiming the oil as it’s own. What it can’t do of course is dictate the rUK’s and the international community’s response, which would be rather stern. Wars have started over much less.
slowjoFree MemberWho will be to blame if Scotland goes on its’ merry way and it all goes horribly wrong? Hitherto, it has been relatively easy to blame the Westminster Crew. AS will claim all the kudos if it works but if it bombs…is he going to hold his hands up and fess up that it was a bit of a bodge/back of an envelope fudge?
I may be wrong, not having been privy to the detailed (proposed) fiscal policies of the SNP but it does seem to me that AS is spending the same revenue time and time again.
As such, it all seems like a house of cards. The dodgy rhetoric of both sides is unconvincing and the only thing that seems to have emerged to me, is a rather unpleasant kind of nationalism.
OTOH I can’t say I don’t agree with the anti London-centric sentiments.
swavisFull MemberAS will claim all the kudos if it works but if it bombs…is he going to hold his hands up and fess up that it was a bit of a bodge/back of an envelope fudge?
He’ll still blame Westminster for not handing it over
kcalFull MemberI think there are many arguments flying around, some convincing some less so. FWIW I see not much of the narrow nationalism to be honest, but I’m aware some have and don’t doubt its presence (egg throwing tribal idiots in Fife anyone).
However I have seen some great debates as well, and it has at least made everyone aware that there is something to be decided, and very few (of my ken) are sleep walking into this, and the turnout will be – I’d hazard – > 83% which is all you can ask for really.
Firmly in the “dinna ken” camp BTW..
binnersFull MemberWho will be to blame if Scotland goes on its’ merry way and it all goes horribly wrong? Hitherto, it has been relatively easy to blame the Westminster Crew. Don’t worry…..Alex has sorted all that out already
BoardinBobFull MemberSimilar to the immigrants stealing our jobs whilst also sitting around all day on benefits.
The topic ‘The effect of a Scottish Yes vote on the rest of the UK?’ is closed to new replies.