surroundedbyhills – Member
That’s right every successful woman has never made it on her own. Wow those grapes are really sour.
Sometimes, people miss the point by so much that I have trouble believing it’s not intentional… Thatcher fans ofter bring up her background in this way. “Grew up over a shop”- yep, one of the 2 shops her family owned. Likewise “daughter of a grocer”- nobody ever said “daughter of the mayor”. Always choosing terms that make her background seem more modest because it helps the image. Denis Thatcher and her family extensively funded her early political career. Perhaps she could have achieved the same without that, but it’s hard to credit, politics is expensive especially if you spend your early career in hard, losing fights (which she did very well in, but not the sort of success that pays the bills)
So same old- the comment is an objection to the mythologising. It’s not saying that she needed a man to succeed. No doubt at all she’d have been succesful in anything she pursued, she was a powerfully intelligent and driven person. Would she have been PM? Not so simple.
But on that note, point of order:
surroundedbyhills – Member
I would expect that getting into to Oxford and having a career as a successful research chemist and lawyer would mean that you tend move in the the kind of circles where you might meet a successful partner.
Her law studies were entirely funded by Denis, so obviously it didn’t contribute to them meeting, and without him wouldn’t have contributed to her meeting others. IIRC she qualified after the birth of Mark and Carol. Same thing- nobody else made her a lawyer, but she was given the support so she could do it herself.