Home › Forums › Chat Forum › Osbourne says no to currency union.
- This topic has 12,714 replies, 258 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by konabunny.
-
Osbourne says no to currency union.
-
JunkyardFree Member
Ben does not hate the Union nor the English anymore than THM hates the Scottish.
They have political views which are not a result of racism which sums up everyone on here.It is not the wisest post we will see on here [ Bens that is] but not worth making a big deal over.
bencooperFree MemberJust making an observation, but clearly you do not appreciate an opposing version of your world view.
Sheesh, stop being so melodramatic – I’m trying to have a grown up discussion here 😉
I’m happy with opposing views, I like them – that’s why I like having discussions on here.
grahamt1980Full MemberJunkyard – Where did I say it was racism?
The cretins in the pic above are far worse.
Was just pointing out how I percieved some of the rhetoric comes across on here.
Sorry but if you don’t like it then bad luckteamhurtmoreFree MemberSums it up well. YS colours come out load and clear in the end!!! Classy. Is that what H-W represents???
Brooes – previous post lost on the train. AS doesn’t worry if there’s a NO. He can carry on spouting sh1te and blaming the English. His real concern is a YES. That’s the point the Emperor’s New Clothes will be fully exposed and he will be fully revealed for all to see.
Positives – level of actual engagement
negatives – a major debate framed by deceit, lies and BSEveryone deserved so much better.
muddydwarfFree MemberNo, Ben is not a racist as far as I can tell. He has his legitimate views and puts them across well.
There is going to be enough recriminations and angst in the coming weeks whichever way the vote goes.JunkyardFree MemberOK so he hatred for anyone not scottish but you were not suggesting racism
Fine as we wereBacks away from the thread and this little sidebar.
I dont want to get involved in this tbhpiemonsterFree MemberSo where’s the official No rally, then? If the No side had an ounce of sense, they’d be rushing to disown this lot and show a huge number of friendly, happy No supporters. But they don’t.
I suspect that being told for the umpteenth time won’t make any difference. But here goes anyway.
A large portion of no voters have keeping quiet and avoiding expressing their opinions. Quite often they wait for Yes voters to leave the area before actually discussing the referendum, if they discus it at all.
Even myself as a very marginal voter have only expressed my voting intention to one person in person, and only then because he contributes to this thread.
Your consistent habit of finding the worst examples of people that happen to disagree with you is unsettling at best.
grahamt1980Full MemberDidn’t realise the scottish were a race, but anyhow.
Good luck to everyone however the vote goes tomorrow.
I hope the union stays but it will work out however.grumFree MemberI’m happy with opposing views
I don’t think anyone has a problem with you supporting the Yes campaign – it’s the constant attempts to imply that essentially Yes voters are better people than No voters that gets extremely tedious.
piemonsterFree MemberI don’t think anyone has a problem with you supporting the Yes campaign – it’s the constant attempts to imply that essentially Yes voters are better people than No voters that gets extremely tedious.
+1 and adding an emoticon after someone pulls you up on it doesn’t make it ok
JunkyardFree Member[pantomime voice] oh yes it does 😛
JOKE – not a serious point laugh or ignore
teamhurtmoreFree Member+1 or in some way more patriotic. Gullible, possibly, more patriotic, hogwash
NorthwindFull Membergrum – Member
it’s the constant attempts to imply that essentially Yes voters are better people than No voters that gets extremely tedious.
Of course, the constant assertions that voters are easily deceived, just following their hearts and ignoring logic while shouting FREEDOM, that it’s all about hatred of the English, that we “haven’t thought this through”, that two and a half million people are going to vote Yes but really just want devo max, etc have remained fresh and entertaining throughout.
piemonsterFree Member[pantomime voice] oh yes it does
JOKE – not a serious point laugh or ignore
Feel the wrath of my offendednessness 😈
teamhurtmoreFree MemberNorthwind – Member
…the constant assertions that no voters are…..Or that we point that you are so pissed (already) that you can’t spell YES. 😉 (saved for posterity after the edit)
Might explain the earlier post though
bigjimFull MemberBloody hell ben, your levels of disgust and hatred for the union (anyone not scottish) are really quite unpleasant. No wonder a lot of no voters are keeping quiet in scotland.
Are you going to set up your own colony of diminished scotland if the vote goes against you?I think he’s just a kid so I wouldn’t get too upset
CaptainFlashheartFree MemberCourtesy of Wyatt Wendels, of Planet Rock fame…
Spare a thought for The Proclaimers
If Scotland gets it’s independence they won’t be able to walk 500 miles anymore.piemonsterFree MemberI think he’s just a kid so I wouldn’t get too upset
Pretty sure he’s a grown up that makes weird looking bikes.
epicycloFull MemberI’ll wrap up my thoughts on the referendum here:
muddydwarf – Member
I’m no fan of Cameron, but why should he resign?
He has arranged a referendum and has promised to abide by the result – what is wrong with that?…Regardless of the result, and despite my contempt for the way the No campaign has been conducted, I will always give Cameron credit for allowing us to have a democratic vote on the future of our country.
brooess – Member
Seems to me no-one wins out of this whole sorry mess:
Yes – half of Scotland pissed off with the other half, rUK pissed off with half of Scotland
No – half of Scotland pissed off with the other half and continued ‘pressing on’ by the SNP for another round of the whole charade in a year’s time, and dragging out the resentment…I think you are a victim of media bullshit. I don’t know anyone who is going to be bearing ill will to their neighbours whichever way it goes. The lack of antagonism has been pointed out several times and this is backed up by the letter the police chiefs have issued chiding the press for trying to whip up strife where there is none. Tomorrow there will be the odd bampot (probably drunk) on either side who will do something, but you’ll only hear it if it is a Yes supporter.
Earlier in the thread, there was mention of the queen’s part. I’m biased, and you’ll probably have guessed I’m a republican, but I think her behaviour has been exemplary. Think carefully is good advice, and whichever way you vote, it’s better that you have carefully thought it over.
I expect a win tomorrow, but if it is a No, I’ll be at a No party getting the piss ripped out of me. (And you think you lot are a tough crowd 🙂 )
The consolation if it is a No win, is that we now have an incredible percentage of the Scots actively involved in the political process. This can only be good.
Politics won’t be the same again in Scotland.
athgrayFree Memberbencooper
But No voters have been incredibly badly represented by the Better Together campaignI agree with you on that.
teamhurtmoreFree MemberI expect a win tomorrow, but if it is a No, I’ll be at a No party getting the piss ripped out of me. (And you think you lot are a tough crowd )
But epic, he who laughs last….
With a NO, you win. Why? You get the result (in reality) you all secretly want. A YES, you don’t. The ultimate irony of the whole episode.
NorthwindFull Memberteamhurtmore – Member
(saved for posterity after the edit)
Well you know, with all these promises of more power and more money in the last week or so it’s got a bit harder to tell the two apart 😉
athgrayFree Memberepicyclo
I expect a win tomorrow, but if it is a No, I’ll be at a No party getting the piss ripped out of me. (And you think you lot are a tough crowd )The consolation if it is a No win, is that we now have an incredible percentage of the Scots actively involved in the political process. This can only be good.
Politics won’t be the same again in Scotland.
+1. (I never thought I would be in agreement)
grumFree MemberOf course, the constant assertions that voters are easily deceived, just following their hearts and ignoring logic while shouting FREEDOM, that it’s all about hatred of the English, that we “haven’t thought this through”, that two and a half million people are going to vote Yes but really just want devo max, etc have remained fresh and entertaining throughout.
Not really the same as a generalised view that one side is morally superior to the other though.
JunkyardFree Memberof course it is different when your side is doing the insulting rather than being insulted – well said
grumFree Memberof course it is different when your side is doing the insulting rather than being insulted – well said
🙄
JunkyardFree MemberAs persuasive as your original explanation and just as well argued
Be serious Grum, both sides have been insulted and insulted and neither side is the “better” or more noble insulter.The evidence is on pretty much every page of this thread.
whatnobeerFree MemberYou get the result (in reality) you all secretly want
The vote hasn’t even happened yet and we all ready have Tories threatening to scupper any plans for more devolution, never mind the fact that none of the 3 main parties could even agree on what extra powers we should get.
I’d be very surprised if Scotland actually gets the extra powers that you seem to think we all actually want to much.
teamhurtmoreFree MemberWell on the basis of one rogue (?) poll they panicked and started making stupid suggestions that make a mockery of the democratic balance in the UK, so for a change good for the Tory backbenchers. The No campaign should have simply laid things out clearly from the start and left yS to condemn themselves out of their own mouths. Instead we have to find out the hard way.
Anyway – hats of to Ben for the incredible enduring optimism and hilarious posts. Despite getting the wrong end of the stick ( 😉 ) the star of the thread. Bravo mon brave!
grumFree MemberAs persuasive as your original explanation and just as well argued
Be serious Grum, both sides have been insulted and insulted and neither side is the “better” or more noble insulter.The evidence is on pretty much every page of this thread.
Yes there have been insults on both sides – but I don’t recall any No supporters persistently adopting the tone of moral superiority that bencooper does. Or complaining incessantly about bias and insults while displaying plenty of both.
Interesting that piemonster agrees – despite not having a ‘side’.
Frankly the reason I focus on bencooper’s posts is because I expected better from him. Slightly worrying to see what happens to otherwise seemingly sensible people on such an emotive issue.
muddydwarfFree MemberIf Scotland votes No, and If extra powers are offered to Scotland then it should only be done on the condition that the same powers are offered to the rest of the UK.
bencooperFree MemberI think he’s just a kid so I wouldn’t get too upset
That’s the nicest thing anyone’s said to me all week 😉
(I’m 37, by the way)
The honest answer is we’re all keyboard warriors. In real life I had a good chat with a No-voting friend earlier, and we both wished each other good luck. Neither of us have seen any examples of rudeness, insults or bitterness from either side, this whole campaign has been remarkably civilised on both sides.
I don’t recall any No supporters persistently adopting the tone of moral superiority that bencooper does
Neither do I – but I didn’t realise that saying Nazi salutes were bad is an example of moral superiority. I don’t think the Yes side is morally superior at all, we just have a different vision for this country, just as we think Scotland is different to the UK. Different, not superior.
Anyway, what it said about No voters being very badly served by Better Together. Most No voters I know are old-style Labour people, people who would probably happily use the word Socialist, and think that New Labour stole their party. They think we should stay in the Union because a working-class person in Glasgow has more in common with a working-class person in Manchester than they do with a middle-class person in Edinburgh. It’s a view I can see a strong argument for.
The problem is that also leads to the inevitable conclusion that all the main political parties need to be swept away and a new better system of government installed. Which would be great, I’d vote for that. Problem is that those main political parties are backing Better Together, so there’s no way they can use those views.
piemonsterFree MemberInteresting that piemonster agrees – despite not having a ‘side’.
There are plenty of examples of posts being made painting the opposite camp in an unfair bad light. I may even have done it myself. Ben is not the worst offender, but he’s the most consistent for it.
I think the Panzer Wagon Bread maker was the worst that comes to mind. At a wild guess.
I do have a side, but it’s nothing to do with Scotland. Scotland’s a coincidence.
grumFree MemberNeither do I – but I didn’t realise that saying Nazi salutes were bad is an example of moral superiority.
‘So this is the Yes crowd in George Square a couple of hours ago:
And this is the No crowd:
Yes, he is doing what you think he’s doing.’You were quite clearly making a generalisation there about No supporters – there’s really no other way to read that post. And that’s far from the only example.
I don’t think the Yes side is morally superior at all
That’s the theme of pretty much all of your posts on here.
There are plenty of examples of posts being made painting the opposite camp in an unfair bad light. I may even have done it myself. Ben is not the worst offender, but he’s the most consistent for it.
Yup and I’ve seen more extreme examples from No supporters on here, some of whom just come across as idiots – but as I said it’s the constant repetition of it from someone who had previously seemed quite reasonable that winds me up.
piemonsterFree MemberIt’s interesting, after talking to lots of people both Yes and No, ive come to a general conclusion: people vote No for selfish reasons, and vote Yes for altruistic ones.
http://singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/osbourne-says-no-to-currency-union/page/193
bencooperFree MemberThat’s the theme of pretty much all of your posts on here.
I’m sorry you see it that way, it’s certainly not intended.
piemonsterFree MemberFinal poll that doesn’t count
Ipsos Moron – Yes 48% No 52%
imnotverygoodFull MemberAm I the only one who is slightly cynical of the number of people on both sides who are being quoted on the BBC’s live feed saying they gave swapped at the last minute? I think I’ll try it here.
I genuinely wanted Alex Salmond to have my babies, but then No’s point about who would get our embassies made me see the light about 3 hours ago. I’m VOTING NO!!!!
The topic ‘Osbourne says no to currency union.’ is closed to new replies.