Home Forums Chat Forum A Summer of Cricket – SPOILERS

Viewing 40 posts - 1,121 through 1,160 (of 1,324 total)
  • A Summer of Cricket – SPOILERS
  • Junkyard
    Free Member

    No i grem up watching lloyd, marshall,Ambrose.richards, richardson etc

    Swings and roundabouts

    You can say what you like about set up and the management but players of the standard they Ozzies had dont come along very often

    IMHO the best aussie team of the past would still beat this one as Warne and Mc Grath are better bowlers than Englands current crop and the batters would be even ish IMHO

    Basically they dont have the players and england do [ thanks to South Africa 😉 ]

    camo16
    Free Member

    IMHO the best aussie team of the past would still beat this one as Warne and Mc Grath are better bowlers than Englands current crop and the batters would be even ish IMHO

    +1

    Historical comparisons are tricky, but I reckon the 1989 Ashes team (I’m not old, I got into cricket young 😉 ) of Border, Marsh, Alderman, Boon, Healy, Hughes, Jones, Taylor, Waugh etc would trash 2013 England.

    Klunk
    Free Member

    turn for swann 🙂

    ransos
    Free Member

    Or would you just like to carry on losing in a tedious point scoring game that I’m sure just about everyone is fed up of reading.

    I could start, if you like. But I’d have to sink to your level and I’d much prefer not to do that.

    Anyway, back to far more interesting things than you. I didn’t expect Kerrigan to actually play! If nothing else, it’s a very rare thing for England to play two spinners.

    fifo
    Free Member

    Cut it out ransos, it’s been pleasant in here for a change.

    Pity we’re not batting first – the two spinners on last would have been very nice

    ransos
    Free Member

    Cut it out ransos, it’s been pleasant in here for a change.

    I’ve no intention of carrying on. I’ve already pointed out that I would prefer not to.

    What do you think about Kerrigan playing?

    Junkyard
    Free Member

    Can you leave your childishness for another thread please

    Zokes please try to not react to that and lets all just discuss cricket please
    EDIT:

    I’ve already pointed out that I would prefer not to.

    Yes you did just after your comment/dig/goad. 🙄

    Just stop please .

    camo16
    Free Member

    What do you think about Kerrigan playing?

    Not a bad call on this wicket. I’m more bemused by Woakes over Tremlett.

    Plus, Jimmy was rocking it – taken out of the attack too early?

    theotherjonv
    Free Member

    Pity we’re not batting first – the two spinners on last would have been very nice

    We might yet be –

    Aus to score a mediocre total, England to score a big one, Australia bat last to avoid an innings defeat (or virtually last, maybe just get enough so we technically bat last but target is double rather than 3 figures)

    Aus to score big, England don’t make follow on, score big in the second and Aus bat last.

    ransos
    Free Member

    Not a bad call on this wicket. I’m more bemused by Woakes over Tremlett.

    It’s offering turn, then?

    Kerrigan’s a good bowler but lacks the control of Swann, IMO. Clarke could get stuck into him.

    According to Mike Selvey, the pitch offers very little for someone like Tremlett.

    fifo
    Free Member

    I’m more bemused by Woakes over Tremlett.

    Well, as Monty seems to have voted himself out thanks to his toiletting problems, I suppose they needed to try out the next spinner for the future should Swanny get hurt.

    That, or they just reckon Tremlett’s not his old self after injury

    Junkyard
    Free Member

    blooding nearly men in a dead rubber to see how they react?

    ransos
    Free Member

    Yes you did just after your comment/dig/goad.

    Just stop please .
    I already said I would. Do we have to go round in circles?

    fifo
    Free Member

    Evidently. Drop it please.

    camo16
    Free Member

    Virtual STW cricket hug anyone?

    fifo
    Free Member

    Kieswetter – whatever happened to him?

    camo16
    Free Member

    Sidebottom, too. What’s the curly-haired maestro up to these days?

    ransos
    Free Member

    blooding nearly men in a dead rubber to see how they react?

    Well yeah, but that’s at odds with everything they’ve been saying about going for the jugular and taking a 4-0 win to Aus.

    drlex
    Free Member

    Kieswetter – whatever happened to him?

    If not said in jest, busy keeping Somerset’s wicket & scores high.

    camo16
    Free Member

    I don’t have live stream, but… it looks as if England has lost the initiative here?

    theotherjonv
    Free Member

    Not panicking yet. Rogers can’t score against spin and is holding an end up, watson is flattering to deceive and will shortly try one shot too many and get out for a dashing 60-odd.

    fifo
    Free Member

    If not said in jest, busy keeping Somerset’s wicket & scores high.

    No, not in jest. Only really follow at the Test level. I guess Prior’s consistency has kept him out of the picture.

    I think Woakes thinks he’s still playing T20, which is annoying.

    Klunk
    Free Member

    Kerrigan – short fulltoss short over pitched short short… 18 off the over I could bat against this

    camo16
    Free Member

    2 debutant bowlers in the same match – seems madness/cocky/idiotic/condescending to the Aussies, no?

    Also, whatever confidence Kerrigan had coming into this match must be waning after a couple of overs?

    camo16
    Free Member

    Can’t help thinking that England’s arrogance/complacency has been laid bare here. Whatever happens from now on, Watson’s taken the two debut lads out of the attack and our attack feels thin…

    dannyh
    Free Member

    Terry Alderman vs. Gooch was a terrifying experience, sonny.

    Yes, but at least it was over quickly most of the time.

    People have mentioned the era of the Waughs, Warne, McGrath, Boon etc, but what really shows the fall of Australian cricket is the others whose era that was, but couldn’t get a game for Oz. Instead, they just dominated county and/or shield cricket.

    Jamie Cox
    Darren Lehmann
    Stuart Law
    Greg Blewett
    Andy Bichel
    Stuart MacGill
    Duncan Spencer
    Matthew Elliot

    Any of these would walk into the Aussie side today.

    Oh, and can someone please have a squiz back through stuff on youtube featuring ‘Boof’ and find an example of him smashing the cover off of one to the keeper and not walking. It shouldn’t be too difficult.

    I think he might be trying to deflect some criticism from his team – the only players who are doing any good are no spring chickens, either – take Clarke, Rogers, Siddle and Haddin out of that team and……

    The series has been only nominally approaching an even contest at a few points, and this has almost completely been down to England under-performing. The gulf in class at the moment is huge.

    fifo
    Free Member

    Hmmm. That may be so, dannyh, but I can’t help thinking that this short snapshot today has revealed that England’s squad isn’t as deep as we like to think

    camo16
    Free Member

    Hmmm. That may be so, dannyh, but I can’t help thinking that this short snapshot today has revealed that England’s squad isn’t as deep as we like to think

    Yep, it would be interesting to know if there really are top quality players being kept out of the team by our first XI.

    And not all XI are great at the moment – Prior being a notable example.

    fifo
    Free Member

    I’ll add to that actually…

    Root has had one brilliant innings and has otherwise looked vulnerable
    Compton didn’t seem to cut it
    Bairstow never seemed to click

    Yes, I know they’re young and need time to gain experience (as do these two bowlers), but they’re not there yet

    teamhurtmore
    Free Member

    From today’s Torygraph – Dan “the cuckoo” Hodges:

    After Durham I wrote how this England side had built a shield of arrogance around themselves that had stood them in good stead during the pivotal moments of the series. But I also said they had a habit of letting that arrogance drift into boorishness. This week Stewart Broad and his team-mates,(I assume his interview was an accurate reflection of the prevailing team ethos) turned boorishness into an art form.
    Arrogance is one thing. Petulance is another.

    Before the series started, England were confronted with accusations of ball-tampering. They reacted with shock and indignation: “It’s come as a very unwelcome distraction and, frankly, we could do without allegations such as these,” said Jimmy Anderson.

    After the Old Trafford Test they faced a new charge of putting tape on the edges of their bats to prevent the Hot Spot camera from detecting an edge. They responded by threatening legal action against the TV channel that had first broadcast the allegations.

    But England can’t have it both ways. If they want to wander around parading their “win at all costs” attitude, they can’t then complain when people start accusing them of trying to win at all costs.

    Andy Flower has built a very good cricket team. But his side is now in danger of letting their hubris outpace their talent. They have just bested Michael Clarke’s Australians, not Steve Waugh’s. They have only briefly managed to hold the world number one spot, and that at a time when the standard of Test cricket is lower than at any point in the past 50 years. If England want to be truly great then Stuart Broad and his colleagues have to realise one important thing: winning is no longer enough….

    …Yes, glorious failure is meaningless. But so is inglorious success. England have to win. But to reach the pinnacle, they have to win with style and class. Great sportsman, great deeds. Not chippy prima donnas who can’t understand why they’re being criticised for knocking the cover off the ball and then standing there like butter wouldn’t melt in their mouth.

    England had the chance of greatness this summer, and they squandered it. They won’t get many more.

    ransos
    Free Member

    Wanting to play hard and ruthless is very different from cheating. The journalist – presumably deliberately – is conflating the two.

    fifo
    Free Member

    To be fair, THM, whilst I agree with most of that, if England’s inglorious victory is compared to Australia’s frankly farsical performance on and behaviour off the field, England still come out on top by some margin. Lehmann’s brainfart to the bogan radio station being the crowning glory

    teamhurtmore
    Free Member

    I know fifo – but STW is a forum where racing to the bottom is normally frowned upon!!

    I think Broad and Lehmann cancelled each other out in terms of the “level” of their comments. Both say a lot about the team cultures, perhaps? Or the media looking to keep the issue warm!!!

    camo16
    Free Member

    Interesting article.

    Is England a great team in 2013?

    IMO, it’s not as complete as the Ashes winning team of Vaughan, Flintoff, Jones etc…

    ransos
    Free Member

    IMO, it’s not as complete as the Ashes winning team of Vaughan, Flintoff, Jones etc…

    What would be your combined XI? I’d go:

    Cook
    Trescothick
    Vaughan (c)
    Pietersen (2005 version)
    Bell (2013 version)
    Prior
    Flintoff
    Broad
    Swann
    Jones
    Anderson

    That’s 6-5 in favour of the 2013 team…

    camo16
    Free Member

    My combined XI:

    Cook
    Strauss
    Vaughan (c)
    Trott
    Pietersen
    Bell
    Flintoff
    Geraint Jones
    Swann
    Simon Jones (or Broad)
    Anderson

    And the Aussie side would be probably all 2005 players…

    jamiea
    Free Member

    Get in! That one must feel good!

    Cheers,
    Jamie

    Klunk
    Free Member

    sitter dropped by the captain

    camo16
    Free Member

    Pivotal moment, that?

    With Watson gone, the AUS innings would look very different.

    fifo
    Free Member

    G Jones?? Are you mad?

    My only change to ransos’ team would be the Harmy of 2005 for Broad. I know Broad has his moments of genius, but Harmy was downright impossible when he was on the money, which, in 2005, he was.

    Hard to see neither Strauss or Hoggy in there, but I woldn’t drop any of the current mob to make room for them

Viewing 40 posts - 1,121 through 1,160 (of 1,324 total)

The topic ‘A Summer of Cricket – SPOILERS’ is closed to new replies.