Home Forums Chat Forum Formula 1 2024 – WILL CONTAIN SPOILERS

Viewing 40 posts - 2,761 through 2,800 (of 3,101 total)
  • Formula 1 2024 – WILL CONTAIN SPOILERS
  • Chew
    Free Member

    Am I alone in that I don’t want to see lots of overtaking?

    The thing with most motorsport is that due to qualifying, the fastest cars start at the front.
    So typically those behind dont have the pace to overtake. Its only when one car starts out of position, or the cars are of a similar speed then overtaking is possible.

    I’d rather have quality over quantity too

    The current regulations seem to have helped with this.
    Although unsure if its the car concept or Wind tunnel/CFD limits which have helped close up the field

    At Baku the top 7 cars were within one second of each other (would have been 8 without Landos incident)
    In the past that could have been just 2 cars from the same team

    jimster01
    Full Member

    I personally wonder how much the performance is restricted by Pirelli ?

    1
    thols2
    Full Member

    I personally wonder how much the performance is restricted by Pirelli ?

    Keep in mind that Pirelli were asked to make tyres that degrade so that strategy plays a bigger role. What the drivers mostly complain about is thermal degradation, so if they put in more than one or two fast laps, the tyres just get cooked and lose pace. What the drivers want is tyres that lose pace as they wear, but are able to be pushed to the limit the whole time. Whether that’s actually possible, I don’t know, those cars crank out 1,000 BHP at maximum deployment and generate tonnes of downforce so all of that has to be transferred to the road through a few inches of rubber.

    the-muffin-man
    Full Member

    Alpine confirms it will no longer produce it’s own engines…

    Renault confirms it will stop building it own F1 engines in 2026

    1
    thols2
    Full Member

    Christ, Piastri must wake up every morning and laugh about how he escaped his Renault contract.

    multi21
    Free Member

    How can a works team **** up so badly? Just sell the team already and have done with it. Pointless half-arsing it.

    nickc
    Full Member

    Just sell the team already

    Isn’t that what Flavio is there to do?

    the-muffin-man
    Full Member

    …not officially! 🙂

    2
    thols2
    Full Member

    How can a works team **** up so badly? Just sell the team already and have done with it. Pointless half-arsing it.

    I get the impression that they’re a bit like Mclaren-Honda a few years back. Officially a works team, but the chassis and engine sides were both half-assed and blaming each other. At least that was so uncompetitive that it was obvious that both sides needed a complete restructuring. Problem with Renault is that they looked like they were becoming competitive a few years back, but that just gave them cover for not actually fixing the problems.

    1
    WorldClassAccident
    Free Member

    …not officially! 🙂

    Does Flavio do anything ‘officially’?

    1
    thepurist
    Full Member

    Does Flavio do anything ‘officially’?

    Lie, cheat, scheme… and manage Alonso.

    Twodogs
    Full Member

    Rumours that Perez is going to announce his “retirement” at Mexico.  Horner saying something like “ideal scenario is Perez in Red Bull next year” but that “2 weeks is a long time in f1”

    andrewh
    Free Member

    So Lawson into an RB 11 races into his career? Explains the mid-season change. Hadjar in whatever VCARB decide to call themselves next year? And Yuki staying where he is?

    jimster01
    Full Member

    Bottas to RB/RBR in case Lawson doesn’t come up with the goods…

    andrewh
    Free Member

    Is Bottas going to be better than Perez? They were both very decent second-tier drivers in their day (and I don’t mean that disparagingly, I mean not quite Hamilton/Alonso level, but still better than most – regular, dependable race-winners, easily as good as Webber, Barachello, Coulthard, etc)

    I’ve not seen any flashes of brilliance from Bottas lately which leads me to think he’ll be better than Checo. I think both have had their day unfortunately, and Riccardo too.

    jimster01
    Full Member

    I think Bottas would be a good replacement for Perez, he’d be a good number 2 driver for next season alongside Verstappen. Not as quick as Max, but quicker than most. Take your point that he hasn’t shown any brilliance recently, but he is in the slowest  car on the grid.

    A handy interim whilst Red Bull sort the mess they’ve created with the driver line up.  Tsunodo will never get the chance whilst Horny is drawing breath for whatever reason.

    boomerlives
    Free Member

    Planet F1 is currently unreadable.

    80% of the ‘stories’ are puff pieces for Danny Ric that ignore the speed of his decline since he left RB.

    I know they’re on a break, but some actual news would be lovely.

    Bez
    Full Member

    I’ve not seen any flashes of brilliance from Bottas lately

    Of course not: he’s driving a shitbox. But I agree, I can’t see any reason to put him into a RB over Perez. And I don’t think that the issue is even just one of whether he’s better than Perez, it’s what’s going on at Red Bull Towers. As far as I can see from my armchair, Horner has been defending both Ricciardo and Perez and trying to keep some stability because he knows that it didn’t work when they were chewing through Gasly, Albon, Hartley etc and spitting them out. But Ricciardo and Perez simply haven’t been delivering consistently, which means Horner’s now on the back foot in terms of driver management. Marko wants to throw the young pups in at the deep end and wants drivers to prove themselves immediately. They need some balance: they need the young talent but they also need to nurture it better than they used to. I think the pendulum is swinging Marko’s way and he presumably wants to use the remainder of 2024, and quite possibly 2025, as a mass audition—who they choose and how they handle them after that remains to be seen.

    andrewh
    Free Member

    Of course not: he’s driving a shitbox

    Either he’s not as good as he used to be or we have all underestimated Zhou, which is of course possible, he could be brilliant and the car even worse than we think. But Bottas isn’t miles ahead of him, in the way that say Albon was compared to Sargent in a slow car.

    the-muffin-man
    Full Member

    In light of recent events I think Lando only has 4 races left to take the title. I can easily see Qatar and UAE being cancelled.

    nickc
    Full Member

    I’ve not seen any flashes of brilliance from Bottas lately

    Much as I like him as a person, I think his recent performances are those of a man who 1. knows that this (up until these rumours started circulating) is going to be his last year in F1, and 2. is driving a car that is woeful, I think even just being on the same lap as the leaders at the finish would be ‘flashes of brilliance’ right now.

    multi21
    Free Member

    andrewh

    Either he’s not as good as he used to be or we have all underestimated Zhou, which is of course possible, he could be brilliant and the car even worse than we think. But Bottas isn’t miles ahead of him, in the way that say Albon was compared to Sargent in a slow car.

    Hard to tell in that shitbox, but if you look at the quali h2h, it’s 17-1 in Bottas’ favour.

    3
    the-muffin-man
    Full Member

    Toyota dip their toe back in F1 with Haas…

    Toyota returns to Formula 1 in new technical collaboration with Haas

    1
    chrismac
    Full Member

    In light of recent events I think Lando only has 4 races left to take the title. I can easily see Qatar and UAE being cancelled.

    No chance. Too much money involved. Anyway despite Qatar hosting hamas they are coming to see the king so they must be decent folk

    multi21
    Free Member

    The-muffin-man

    Full Member

    Toyota dip their toe back in F1 with Haas…

    Didn’t see that coming! Bit of a result for Ollie

    andrewh
    Free Member

    There’s been the usual rumours going around about Haas selling to Andretti for ages. I guess that’s off the table now, Toyota won’t a tie in with GM will they? Or vice versa.

    simondbarnes
    Full Member

    Andretti won’t buy a team. They were too tight to buy one when teams were “cheap” – no chance now.

    thols2
    Full Member

    There’s been the usual rumours going around about Haas selling to Andretti for ages.

    Haas were never for sale. Gene Haas is happy to do things on the cheap and trundle around in the mid-field. He uses the team to promote his company, it doesn’t need to be a front-runner to do that.

    Andretti won’t buy a team. They were too tight to buy one when teams were “cheap” – no chance now.

    Michael Andretti has been shown the door, they are under new management. I’m sure Flav would happily sell Alpine if anyone turned up with enough money.

    multi21
    Free Member

    the-muffin-man
    Full Member

    Woke up to this story too – why is the team ‘unidentified’ – going to be another bulge under the FIA carpet…

    https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/fia-acts-for-us-gp-on-suspicions-over-front-bib-parc-ferme-trick/10663272/

    …we can only see who goes backwards this weekend and guess.

    multi21
    Free Member

    I’m surprised it’s only one team, as I noticed a long while ago that some teams are running complicated looking mechanisms in that area.

    Interesting that it mentions the adjustment being made from a settings change in the cockpit, quite specific.

    I suppose the reason for it is getting a mega-low ride height in quali without wearing the plank too much in the race? Or maybe just keeping the floor entrace height consistent as the fuel load changes?

    1
    multi21
    Free Member
    1
    the-muffin-man
    Full Member

    The plan should be disqualification – cars have been chucked out of races for fractions of a mm infringements.

    1
    bruneep
    Full Member

    There is no evidence that the device has been used under parc fermé conditions.

    a non story then

    1
    WorldClassAccident
    Free Member

    There is no evidence that the device has been used under parc fermé conditions.

    a non story then


    I am sure they just made it to pass an idle hour on a sunday afternoon, a bit like the Toyota turbo air intake limiter on their rally cars. They never proved it was used because they couldn’t test the cars while at full throttle but the fact it was fitted and would have works was enough of a suggestion to get them banned for a year.

    There was no evidence of any undetected crime/abuse/infringement until it is detected.

    1
    chrismac
    Full Member

    RB cheating again. If there was no benefit they wouldn’t have made it and saved the weight.

    4
    multi21
    Free Member

    bruneep

    a non story then

    As with McLaren the other week, teams don’t spend money out of their cost cap changing parts for no reason.

    Although knowing red bull they probably would have argued the tea tray comes under the catering budget

    pondo
    Full Member

    Reminds me of the Benetton “traction control software what we never used, honest guv” story.

    1
    boomerlives
    Free Member

    There is no evidence that the device has been used under parc fermé conditions

    Verstappen says it gives no competitive advantage.

    How would he know?

Viewing 40 posts - 2,761 through 2,800 (of 3,101 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.