Brought to you by the same film makers who faked the moon landings.

I thought it was hit by some aeroplanes, stacked with jet fuel and then disintegrated.

Oh bollocks, the steel didn’t melt. Must not get drawn in. Go and heat up plastic to a low level (so it doesn’t melt) and watch how it’s structural properties change. The steel did not turn to liquid, it started to creep when the temperatures went over roughly 300oC. It’s not a difficult concept to wrap your head around, the heat makes it expand (add heat to anything and thermal expansion is a given), this impacts greater forces into the connections, the steel deflects beyond it’s elastic limits, the combination of all this meant the connections failed and the building collapsed in on itself, any ‘exploding’ member say have been a sudden release in energy when the connections failed.

Stop spreading this shite. Leslie E Robinson designed an amazing structure that performed incredibly well under the fire loads and damage imparted to them by planes flown into them by psychotic murderers. The biggest mistake on the day was sending people back to their desks at the start of the attacks.

Conspiracy theories are all well and good but when they can be disproved so easily but the facts ignored I can understand why the world is in such a crap place led by a bunch of muppets.

Grrrrrr.

Pass the tin foil

The overwhelmingly by argument for a non-conspiracy is that there’s never been a whilstleblower from the inside. A conspiracy such as this would of involved hundreds, if not thousands of people. Not one person has come forward and said “I was on th inside” 15+ years later. In the era of wiki leaks and social media the ex prime minister can’t even keep it quiet that he likes felatio from a dead pig, let alone thousands of people conspiring together to kill thousands of their countrymen. See also Kennedy assignation, moon landings and climate change. Ps vapour trails are not real either. I have no doubt that governments have done some truly evils nefarious things that you only ever find out a small part of it if your lucky, but the tr scale of collusion that would of had to be involved in 9/11 makes it impossible to to keep secret

A driver losing control of an Audi TT managed to half demolish a house near me, and yet a ginormous passenger aircraft packed full of fuel isn’t enough to topple a building by itself? Right you are.

Mate I’m a chartered structural engineer with over twenty years experience. On the day the planes hit I watched it unfold like many others and my first thought was get everyone out. When the first tower dropped it had been stood up after the impact with aviation fuel for over an hour. The structure was designed in such a way that it had a clear footprint and that the columns were all on the external elevations and central cores. It collapsed in a manner not unexpected for the damage it had received.

Please I’ve read up on this a number of times, but not for the best part of a decade so may be a little rusty. If you are seriously interested there are a number of reputable articles, by you know, real experts, about the collapse mechanisms of the towers, go knock yourself out. I know we’re not meant to listen to experts in our post truth world, but try, please. Otherwise come to me when you’re sick, I have some magic water, only & £100 for 10ml, cures everything, trust me I have no medical background apart from watching casualty in the 90s…

There are some proper dohtards on this thread, a house is not designed or built like a high rise tower… The wind loads the wtc was designed for would probably catch a plane.

I’m out of here, racing in the morning….

Yaaaaawn.

They couldn’t even keep watergate secret in the 60’s, wihich involved a handful of people, pre mass channels of communication. How are hundreds if not thousands of people going to keep this underwraps – they paper trail alone would be devastating! Of course you could consider me one of the “sheeple”, but if Donald trump can’t even bury his recordings taliking about groping women when he’s president, how would you co-ordinate this mass silence?

TurnerGuy, If you want people to think you’re an idiot, just say you like Donald Trump. Saves all that nonsense you posted.

[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gF70L4f9m0c[/video]

@sofaboy

1) I mean flying at a constant altitude (not dropping!) over a sustained period of time

2) in the aftermath, the story was that one of bush’s cronies had bulk purchased the rubble and hauled it out to Texas.

But there should have been waaaay more rubble at the site, (1/4 of a million tonnes?)
Where did it go?

Bear in mind that the other wtc buildings were destroyed too.

2) in the aftermath, the story was that one of bush’s cronies had bulk purchased the rubble and hauled it out to Texas

1) as above, if a plane can fly constant and level at 40,000 ft (the average height of a long haul flight), it can fly constant and level at 1000ft (the rough height it the the towers). once a plane is up, it can fly at whatever height it likes (with mitigating factors of fuel, airspace etc).

2) it took over 3 months to put the fires out on site. It took over 8 months To fully clear the site with hundreds of people working day and night. Why would one of bushes cronies buy the rubble?? As aggregate there’s no value in it as it’s so mixed in composition and it clearly wasn’t a cover up to get it off site as it took 8 months???

8 months of site clearance is a lot of rubble. A shit ton of tubble. Kind of like two sky scrapers of rubble

There’s no conspiracy- put down the tin foil hat

The insurance and more importantly the re-insurance market has been preparing since the the event for the mesothelioma claims that will flood in within the next 15-20 years. At some point someone will bring a class action which will make Grenfell (which will break all previous awards in PL & PI claims) look like peanuts

I enjoy reading about the conspiracy theories about the 9/11 attacks, for one main reason is that there is a lot of footage and eye witness reports about it. Probably one of the more “filmed” events in recent history, which gives the opportunity to view with either open or sceptical eyes.
Plenty of tin foil hatters berating the governments sources for evidence and expert opinion, but there are some credible sources who have been silenced by either government influence or pure journalists ridicule.

If you read and watch with an open mind sure you can come up with a myriad of excuses and theories, yet the overwhelming evidence suggests the TV footage wasn’t faked nor manipulated.

But we’re at that time of year when the subject matter repeats itself, for those conspiracy theorists it’s now ingrained in the calendar and for them needs commemorating.