Home Forums Chat Forum 2019 General Election

  • This topic has 6,282 replies, 176 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by kelvin.
Viewing 40 posts - 4,241 through 4,280 (of 6,291 total)
  • 2019 General Election
  • cromolyolly
    Free Member

    If the EU is neo liberal, they are the most incompetent neo liberals on the face of the Earth. Workers protections, environmental legislation, policies which promote family life, subsidised sectors of the economy are all hardly neo liberal policies. Which is basically what the EU spends half it’s time doing. The fact that there a bunch of hard right/dictatorship governments in the EU are hardly liberal

    . Not one EU member has an NHS.

    But they basically all have universal healthcare, where the ability to pay is not an impediment to getting whatever care you need. Pretty socialist.

    rone
    Full Member

    If the EU is neo liberal, they are the most incompetent neo liberals on the face of the Earth. Workers protections, environmental legislation, policies which promote family life, subsidised sectors of the economy are all hardly neo liberal policies. Which is basically what the EU spends half it’s time doing.

    Well that because it’s not wholly Neolib. And like I said the trajectory has changed. If the EU does anything that appears to support a workforce than I would say that is to generally grease the wheels of trade.

    Workers rights could be upheld by strong unions. The EU is doing nothing new other than making things consistent.

    Given the last 10 years or so of Tory rule – things have been bleak for the average punter. The positives of the EU are certainly not that evident under Tory rule.

    However it would probably be worse if the Tories were allowed to be completely untethered.

    binners
    Full Member

    What have the Romans EU ever done for us?

    kerley
    Free Member

    bravo

    kelvin
    Full Member

    Capping class sizes at 30 pupils.

    And still the media welcome that commitment as “unachievable” (including the BBC). The same media that was up in arms about removing charitable status from fee paying schools.

    We’re mugs.

    martinhutch
    Full Member

    And still the media welcome that commitment as “unachievable”

    The BBC Breakfast interview was particularly poor. Laying into Angela Rayner because 20,000 teachers wouldn’t materialise out of thin air on December 13, and because a pledge to have 45,000 extra qualified teachers by the end of a first Labour term was 10,000 short of what NAO reckons we need.

    Thought she handled it pretty well, certainly Labour’s best media performer.

    gonefishin
    Free Member

    Also, when TF is Johnson going to go before Andrew Neil? I mean, it couldn’t be as bad as Corbyn, shirley? So, what’s he got to lose?

    He’s running his campaign straight from the Trump playbook. Doesn’t want to be questioned on his personal life (taxes for trump/kids for BJ), doesn’t want to be held to proper scrutiny which will show him up, threaten the press when they do things he doesn’t like. Is this a man you can really vote for?

    One slightly amusing thing about my constituency is that the only leaflet I’ve received is one that says “vote for me (Tory) unless you want the SNP to win and that means Indyref2”. Basically the Tory candidate is extoling the virtues of voting tactically which is something I will likely be doing just not in the way he thinks. I voted no in the independence referendum but I think I’ll be voting SNP in an attempt to keep the Tories from getting a majority.

    kimbers
    Full Member

    Can always rely on cassetteboy

    outofbreath
    Free Member

    And still the media welcome that commitment as “unachievable”

    I heard it and my first thought was it’s unachievable, assuming the plan really is to impose a cap. There’s two ways to do it, move kids around schools or making schools split all classes with (say) 31 into two classes of (say) 15 and 16. Neither seems remotely practical.

    My daughter’s class has 2 TAs in addition to a teacher. If they split her class would they hire another teacher and pair of TAs? If they don’t double up on TAs as well as the teacher the staff to child ratio hardly changes. ….*and* they’d need to build another classroom. Alternatively they have to farm out the excess kids to other schools which isn’t good for the kids, the parents or the environment/traffic.

    So yeah, unacheivable and counter productive.

    A better way to reduce class sizes is to simply fund schools to the point where (in time) class sizes can be under 30. Accpet there will be places where that’s just not practical in some years in some exceptional places.

    kelvin
    Full Member

    Crazy idea… more trained teachers. Just an idea.

    moonsaballoon
    Full Member

    I voted no in the independence referendum but I think I’ll be voting SNP in an attempt to keep the Tories from getting a majority.

    Yep , I’m a no voter who has just posted off my first vote for the SNP in a hope of getting rid of our Tory mp . I just hope there is an acknowledgement after the election that not everyone who voted SNP is in favour of independence .

    kimbers
    Full Member

    My kids primary school runs a pre-school reading club for kids who struggle (get little help at home?), whenever I drop my kids off I go past the classroom they run it in, usually see some of the kids attacking a muffin that I’m assuming teachers have brought in for them. I then feel guilty that my kids are well fed.
    I think labours school breakfast policy is an excellent one , but there deep problems in this country if it’s needed.

    binners
    Full Member

    Crazy idea… more trained teachers. Just an idea.

    COMMUNIST!!!! 😉

    Its mental that the press are all screaming about the how the labour party are going to be funding all this, and rightfully so, as it all does seem to be a bit ‘moon on a stick’ which is heavily dependent on magic money trees

    But apparently Johnson is going to be promising a round of tax cuts today, after all their pledges of increased public spending

    Thats an even less credible position, which isn’t being held up to the same scrutiny.

    I suppose it all comes down to what you think our national priorities are.

    At this election, looking at the present state of the country would you like

    A) a party committed to more funding for education and the NHS and who are serious about addressing homelessness

    or

    B) a couple of quid a week off you tax bill

    Given the recent voting record of this country, I’m not optimistic

    gonefishin
    Free Member

    Crazy idea… more trained teachers. Just an idea.

    How long does it take to train a teacher from scratch? How long should a parliament be sitting for? The fact the former is greater than the latter tells you why that pledge isn’t made.

    kelvin
    Full Member

    One year.
    Five years.
    1 < 5

    Unless “by scratch” you mean all their education before their teacher training.

    Max class sizes of 30 pupils is a totally achievable and meagre aim in the grand scheme of things. Have our sights been set so low? How? Who by? We’re mugs.

    gonefishin
    Free Member

    One year.

    Only if you start with a graduate. A full time education degree takes four years https://www.ntu.ac.uk/study-and-courses/courses/find-your-course/education/ug/2019-20/primary-education
    and then you will need to add a probationary period before they are fully qualified. It takes longer to train a teacher than a fixed term parliament lasts.

    Cougar
    Full Member

    There’s two ways to do it, move kids around schools or making schools split all classes with (say) 31 into two classes of (say) 15 and 16. Neither seems remotely practical.

    Back when I was at school we learned maths had 6 classes of ~32 kids in each year. Getting under 30 would have meant 32*6/7 = 7 classes of 27-28 kids, not double the number.

    My daughter’s class has 2 TAs in addition to a teacher. If they split her class would they hire another teacher and pair of TAs?

    My girlfriend is a TA in a primary school. She’s one of two in her entire school. I don’t know where you’re getting one teacher and two TAs per class from, that seems ludicrous to me. Maybe what they need there is smaller classes…?

    kelvin
    Full Member

    Only if you start with a graduate.

    Start with graduates then.

    Other routes should stay open, and be increased, but if you want an increase in qualified teaching staff in a short period, there is one of your routes. Want more routes? There are schools with tiny class sizes (fee paying)… try and poach their staff.

    It takes longer to train a teacher than a fixed term parliament lasts.

    Well, if you only look at the longest route, taking non graduates, yes. If you look at graduates (fresh, or from other “industries”, or currently TAs and HLTAs) it’s one or two years.

    Max class size of 30 is completely doable, and affordable by the UK.

    boomerlives
    Free Member

    Crazy idea… more trained teachers. Just an idea.

    They would also need more rooms. Just saying.

    kelvin
    Full Member

    Or not shortening the school week, and not reducing non academic time in schools (such as PE). Just saying.

    gonefishin
    Free Member

    Want more routes? There are schools with tiny class sizes (fee paying)… try and poach their staff.

    Assuming they are qualified teachers in the first place which won’t necessarily be true. The point I was trying to make is that the length of time such a commitment would take to deliver would in all likelihood mean that it would not be delivered until the next parliament meaning that the government that enacted such a commitment wouldn’t get the benefits and given the relatively short lived focus of our system (see examples wrt social care, pensions etc) it means that good long term policies don’t get enacted.

    kelvin
    Full Member

    Five years is doable. Both Labour and LibDems are committed to raising the number of teachers in that time. Such meagre aims being met with such baseless derision is telling.

    outofbreath
    Free Member

    Back when I was at school we learned maths had 6 classes of ~32 kids in each year.

    Yes, in thousands of schools a Class Size Cap will be relatively starighforward to conform to. Just build one more class room for each year groups hire a teacher and TAs, extend the other facilities and away you go. (Six Form entry seems like a staggering number to me, where did you live Shenzeng?)

    In thousands of other schools (single and double form entry schools which I suspect are the norm) it will be impossible/a nightmare.

    I bet there are *far* more single form entry schools than there are 6 form entry schools.

    Max class size of 30 is completely doable, and affordable by the UK.

    “Max class size of 30” is not the same as “class size capped at 30 in every school over a single parliament”. One is perfectly reasonable (as long as you allow reasonable exceptions), the other is mental.

    outofbreath
    Free Member

    It takes longer to train a teacher than a fixed term parliament lasts.

    I don’t think teachers are the bottleneck here. Does the policy even promise each class with have a qualified teacher? I assume no in which case they could meet the promise by giving the extra classes a TA and splitting the teachers time 50/50. (I’m sure they won’t but they *could* if they had to and it would still meet the promise.)

    The problem is moving kids arouns schools & building extra classrooms/schools. It’s just totally impractical and not going to happen. And will be very unpopular – my kids are happy where they are. If they have to move half way through primary school I’m not going to be very chuffed. Plus to ensure every class is under 30 you’re going to have loads of remote places with class sizes of 15, and doubleing the size of the school to achieve it.

    …and when all that’s done, you can get your life the number of TAs will have dropped of a cliff so the tutor/pupil ratio won’t be that much better.

    Edukator
    Free Member

    Do you people realise how many ex-teachers there are out there who would be more than happy to go back into the profession for reasonable pay and conditions. The world is running with ex-teachers, literally, who’ve found better pay and conditions elsewhere. And there’s not much point training more teachers when after a few years in the profession they’ll be off to greener, tastier grass.

    Teachers are undervalued, underpaid, overworked, insulted, derided, threatened… change that and there will be more teachers than teaching jobs.

    kelvin
    Full Member

    you’re going to have loads of remote places with class sizes of 15

    Well, those few schools with class sizes of 15/16 will be hitting the sweet spot that studies have shown to work best. That’s a side effect I think we can live with as a country… and will even out fast anyway… parents will want to send their kids to schools with less than 20 kids in class (but they will still be rare as hell).

    Edit: I was lucky enough to go to a remote school with small class sizes (long since closed down – yey, vote Tory) so I have no fear of such an outcome, even if it was likely.

    Teachers are undervalued, underpaid, overworked, insulted, derided, threatened… change that and there will be more teachers than teaching jobs.

    Edit: a good opportunity for me to agree with TJ wholeheartedly. It’s been too long! Listen to him.

    kelvin
    Full Member

    Looks like the project to replace the Conservative Party with the Conservative Brexit Party is continuing apace. Brexit Party MEPs are leaving their party and backing this new monstrosity. If you were a Conservative voter in the past (the party of business and personal liberty etc) please have a close look at what you will be voting for if you support the party with that name this time.

    sobriety
    Free Member

    @outofbreath

    On TTIP

    Not in any detail. AFAIC they couldn’t get agreement from all the member states so it went ‘No deal’.

    It’s didn’t go “no deal” it went “maintaining our current status quo” which is remaining as we are.

    This kind of bullshit use of language and conflation irritates the hell out of me.

    binners
    Full Member

    Looks like the project to replace the Conservative Party with the Conservative Brexit Party is continuing apace.

    Summed up perfectly in this Guardian article from a couple of months back

    The Tories have lost their ideology. Now they are merely the party of resentment

    What does the Conservative party stand for in 2019? If you survey the central tenets of Tory ideology from the past 50 years, it is hard to find a single one that is still intact.

    They morphed into the Brexit party months ago and are now carrying on down that ever-further right trajectory of small-minded insular nationalism

    kerley
    Free Member

    At this election, looking at the present state of the country would you like

    A) a party committed to more funding for education and the NHS and who are serious about addressing homelessness

    or

    B) a couple of quid a week off you tax bill

    Given the recent voting record of this country, I’m not optimistic

    I share your pessimism. Labour are committing to at least try and sort out some of the shit in this country but people expect it all to be free. To sort out the mess money needs to be spent and that money comes from the people in the country. A Tory win is clearly a sign that nobody really gives a shit about all the stuff they claim to when it may impact them just a tiny amount.

    kelvin
    Full Member

    The Tory proposition is that they will “undo” some of their own cuts using money they said we didn’t have. They will also reduce some of the damage the fear of Hard Brexit is having by increasing the certainty that a Hard Brexit is coming. And people will vote for that nonsense, which is maddening.

    molgrips
    Free Member

    To sort out the mess money needs to be spent and that money comes from the people in the country.

    Not all of it – taxing foreign companies doing business here will bring money into the country.

    binners
    Full Member

    Just to prove the point that the Tory Party is now really the Brexit Party and the two are indivisible…

    Three MEPs quit Brexit party to back Conservatives

    Nige is going to be most put out that there really is no point to them any more, and even his own MEP’s can see it. I wonder if he’ll abandon this party a la UKIP and go on to set up the Brexity Brexity Brexit McBrexitface party?

    onewheelgood
    Full Member

    Not all of it – taxing foreign companies doing business here will bring money into the country.

    Not quite. It will prevent some money leaving the country.

    5thElefant
    Free Member

    Not all of it – taxing foreign companies doing business here will bring money into the country.

    Getting rid of corporation stealth tax would encourage companies to setup here and bring money into the country.

    molgrips
    Free Member

    Not quite. It will prevent some money leaving the country.

    Unless the tax bill is subsidised by takings from other countries.. but not sure if there is a commercial reason to stay if that were the case.

    If Amazon stopped operating in the UK AND we had Brexit then someone would have to setup a retailer in the UK to fulfil the same niche. It would be interesting how that panned out.

    Getting rid of corporation stealth tax would encourage companies to setup here and bring money into the country.

    Why is corporation tax a stealth tax? Everyone knows about it. It’s only payable on cash that you sit on instead of paying workers or spending. Try harder Mr Troll!

    alcolepone
    Free Member

    10 years of torys, and yet people going to food banks will still vote for them!!?!?!
    Who do you vote for if your cupboards are empty?

    5thElefant
    Free Member

    Why is corporation tax a stealth tax? Everyone knows about it. It’s only payable on cash that you sit on instead of paying workers or spending. Try harder Mr Troll!

    It’s a stealth tax because people think they’re not paying it. Like every other tax it’s passed on to the customer. Which would be you and I.

    kelvin
    Full Member

    Like every other tax it’s passed on to the customer

    Maybe. Possibly. Often not. Sometimes. Perhaps. It depends.

    pondo
    Full Member

    The problem is moving kids arouns schools & building extra classrooms/schools. It’s just totally impractical and not going to happen. 

    Are you labouring under the misapprehension that schools have shrunk?

Viewing 40 posts - 4,241 through 4,280 (of 6,291 total)

The topic ‘2019 General Election’ is closed to new replies.