- This topic has 1,031 replies, 109 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by .
-
"1,400 children were subjected to "appalling" sexual exploitation in Rotherham"
-
Posted 9 years agoThe Times seem to be saying Dave and Nick dont take it seriously
Posted 9 years agoLambeth(which is also alleged to include an Minister from Tony Blair’s Cabinet):
Details of an internal investigation documenting allegations of sexual assaults and abuse carried out by officers within Lambeth council in the 1990s have been revealed. They include:
:: There were two sites on Lambeth council property used to carry out sexual assaults. They were used for this purpose “on many occasions over the years”.
:: Two private removal firms were “frequently” on site, and were believed to have removed evidence of equipment used during sexual assaults, and washed the area down. One firm had keys to all internal lockers, including a cabinet where evidence in a criminal case was kept and later went missing.
:: Items handed to police following the rape of a female member of staff by a colleague on council premises included a semen-stained blanket, soiled tissues, cassettes and a penknife.
Bulic Forsythe who worked at Lambeth Council and was murdered allegedly before blowing the whistle on abuse thereBulic Forsythe’s family have long believed he was murdered
:: Bulic Forsythe, a manager in the housing department, told colleagues he was going to “spill the beans” after a visit to one of these sites.
He clashed with an individual who held a senior position and is named in the report as the head of the ring involved in abuse, and then moved from the housing department to social services.
Whilst in social services Bulic told another colleague he believed the individual in housing could still ‘get to him’. After his death in 1993, colleagues reported that a report he had compiled went missing from his office.
:: Three male employees, including one in a senior position, were suspended from their jobs in the housing department as a result of the internal investigation.
Despite the findings of rape and sexual assault, and possessing indecent images of children, they were suspended on grounds of a ‘breach of the council’s equal opportunities policy’.
:: The report recommends a criminal investigation into the allegations of rape, child rape and images of abuse. The Metropolitan Police has confirmed no investigation was ever undertaken at the time.
gives more credence to this:
As the owner of several North Wales Care Homes, John Allen (also involved in trafficking kids to Dolphin Square)
is linked to
Michael Carroll, who ran carehomes in Lambeth
That is before you factor in allegations of kids being trafficked to and from Northern Ireland via the same networks
It now appears that the VIP paedophile network surrounding Elm Guest House and Dolphin Square is not only linked to North Wales care homes, but also to Kincora in Northern Ireland, which is also well known for involvement of the security services…
(from this thread, with the usual doubters: http://singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/what-the-bbc-news-now/page/3)
and yep, in addition to Leon Brittan, I also mentioned Lambeth several months ago
Haters gonna hate…
Posted 9 years agoIt’s a shame this is such a divisive issue: I’m sure deep down, everyone agrees that exploitation and abuse is abhorrent, no matter who does it, be they pakistani taxi drivers, policemen, or members of the council.
However, when you have people in positions of power, with a duty of care, be they care home staff, policemen, judges, MPs, high ranking military officers and the intelligence services, who themselves are actively involved, you have to question the entire system which has allowed this to happen.
Not forgetting of course:
as Party members, many MPs have had involvement in local councils, many of which likely have child abuse scandals of their own…
This is a watershed moment~ we will be able to see just how seriously those in power take exposing such horrendous exploitation…
Including the current Home Secretary Theresa May:
“She is neatly ignoring the fact that the Northern Ireland Assembly unanimously supports the inclusion of Kincora in the Westminster inquiry, because it knows that the local inquiry has no powers to compel evidence from MI5 and the Ministry of Defence and that it does not have the confidence of victims or potentially crucial witnesses.
“Kincora should be investigated alongside claims of establishment involvement in child abuse rings in other parts of the UK.
“With new allegations emerging of links between Kincora and paedophile rings elsewhere in the UK, the case for inclusion has never been stronger.
“Kincora’s child abuse victims were badly let down in the 70s.
“Sadly, they are being failed again now by this government.”
The names being bandied around are indeed members of the political elite, much like Elm Guest House and Kincora, which both have several accounts of being used by the intelligence services for filming and blackmail purposes (a control mechanism if you will).
There are several allegations implicating Lord Mountbatten in abuse at Kincora.
Lord Mountbatten introduced Jimmy Savile to the Royal Family in the 60s and they were close from that time until his death in 2011.
Posted 9 years agoMI5 does not have powers to arrest or execute a search warrant.
Therefore, the Operations Branch of Special Branch as well as developing intelligence and conducting its own investigations, acted as the executive arm of MI5, making the arrests and conducting searches, as directed by MI5.This was particularly emphasized in the county forces Special Branch units, because in those days MI5 had no presence outside London.
Hence the involvement of Special Branch in protecting Cyril Smith from arrest in Rochdale, detailed above which was certainly at the direction of MI5.
In London Special Branch (SO12) had responsibility for, amongst other things, personal protection of (non-royal) VIPs and performing the role of examining officer at designated ports and airports.
The investigative wing of the Special Branch known as X squad became the Metropolitan Police Anti-Terrorist Branch (SO13) in 1972.
In the Metropolitan Police (which had national responsibilities at the time) it was grouped under the Assistant Commissioner Security, along with the Palace of Westminster Division SO17 (now CO7) (responsible for security of MPs), the Special Branch protection officers (now Specialist Protection Branch SO1) responsible for providing specialist protection (for the current and former Prime Ministers, Home Secretary, Foreign Secretary, Secretary of State for Defence and others) and the Royalty Protection Branch SO14.
All of these squads liaised closely.
Posted 9 years agoGoing by the verdict of the Home Affairs Select Committee inquiry, it doesn’t appear they’re that effective:
woefully underequipped and hamstrung in achieving its original objectives. It has neither the powers nor the resources that it needs to get to the truth when the integrity of the police is in doubt.
Also just found a bit more info on John Mann’s recent amendment allowing disclosure under the Official Secrets Act:
Posted 9 years agoOne for the Guardian readers: Our Cyril Smith story came out in 1979. What followed was a 36-year cover-up
We also wrote to the then leader of the Liberal party, David Steel, for his comments. We quoted the response of the Liberal party press office, dated 22 April 1979, in our newspaper: “It is not a very friendly gesture, publishing that, all he seems to have done is spanked a few bare bottoms.” So, Steel chose to look the other way, and within a decade was recommending Smith for a knighthood. Fleet Street looked away at the time too. There was not a national paper newsdesk that did not have a copy of our well-sourced article. Smith threatened and blustered, and they all backed off.
And one for those who prefer the Daily Mail: Why I fear this monstrous sex abuse cover-up is FAR worse than we know…
The topic ‘"1,400 children were subjected to "appalling" sexual exploitation in Rotherham"’ is closed to new replies.