Home › Forums › Bike Forum › Zwift Team Time Trial, Thursday
- This topic has 2,381 replies, 54 voices, and was last updated 1 year ago by slowpuncheur.
-
Zwift Team Time Trial, Thursday
-
robbo1234bikingFree Member
Sorry about tonight. I was doing fine and then hit that tiny hill and I just had nothing all of a sudden. Was struggling to even hit 200w. Will rearrange my week next week to get a rest day on the Wednesday. I watched you all ride for a bit afterwards and guys were doing 250w in the group so I should have easily been able to keep up. Bugger – annoyed with myself now!
zilog6128Full MemberFound that extremely tough, worse than last week despite putting out a few watts less on average. Due to the relatively flat nature of the course & Phil’s inability to grasp basic physics (you’re supposed to have a rest on the downs 😉) there was absolutely nowhere to hide or recover. Wanted to quit from about the halfway point until we got to the last km. Genuinely don’t know how I hung on!!
Not convinced that a full team of 8 actually made it any easier! Did feel like we were flying once we got into a rhythm though. Great ride all! 👍😀🚴
oopnorthFree MemberThanks Scaredypants but I got the message too late and ended up staying later at work, thinking I wasn’t needed 🙂
Looks like it was a fast one, all your numbers were well high, not sure if I had that in me tonight, some serious w/kg!!
Looks like you had a hanger on at one point…I thought that wasn’t allowed??
zilog6128Full MemberLooks like you had a hanger on at one point…I thought that wasn’t allowed??
yeah, could see a few teams complaining about him as he drafted them when they passed! He was messaging at one point that it was a TT and he should be able to ride it as such, not sure he really understood what event he was in 😂
scaredypantsFull MemberThanks for letting me join in – really enjoyed it
That was pretty much on my limit currently but hoping it’ll do me some good – I’m not sure I’ve ever been fitter than when I was doing a couple of races every week.
If there’s loads of interest, presumably we could have 2 groups entered separately – or else everyone could all be on 1 team and phil56 on another all on his own. I reckon that’d be a pretty close race 😁
haloricFree MemberThanks all, just about made it through, was getting the first signs of cramp with about 6K to go so happy to get to the end, thought I was going to be forced to limp in.
That ride had best 20mins effort at 284w, best ever at 285w, so I’ll take that.
I do often raise an eyebrow when Phil says ‘this is downhill’, and its dead 0% on my screen, or ‘its downhill’, therefore more effort.. but he is what makes us go so hard !.
Enjoyed it again, will enjoy it even more when I can walk normally.
Ant.
savoyadFull MemberAargh, you lot were sat in the final qualifying slot for the platinum league (with two time zones left to race)…
…and then the results computer decided to count @scaredypants (unclassified at the start) as a B after all which boosted you up into frappe.
Great ride though. I watched some of it as a dotrace with stats on zwiftpower live.scaredypantsFull Member…and then the results computer decided to count @scaredypants (unclassified at the start) as a B after all which boosted you up into frappe.
😬😬
(Soz)oopnorthFree MemberNah…looking at that I wouldn’t have been able to keep up I’m sure, or at least I would have only been hanging on 😉
Well done guys, great effort!
scaredypantsFull MemberI don’t really know how it all works but on ZP we seem to have won our group ? (F = frappe, presumably)
Mighty tight group too (0.7 seconds for us all)
weeksyFull MemberI’m inclined to agree Ooop. 270+w for 55 mins… NAh, can’t do that i’m afraid
savoyadFull MemberHere are everyone’s numbers:
Robbo’s at the bottom, everyone else finished together.
Remember – that was an exceptionally fast ride (for our team) and a powerful group and the strategy of trying to stick together means you don’t be able to keep up with that to keep up.dangeourbrainFree MemberNot convinced that a full team of 8 actually made it any easier!
We were definitely moving quicker than usual so I’d go so far as to say it did.
I certainly managed to do more bigger pulls on the front than usual without people dropping off and holding up the rear when Phil was pulling was about 230w and needed a lot less filling of gaps suggesting sitting in the group was easier than usual. Normally rear wheel sees me at about 260 but needs a big kick to plug a gap every few minutes.Even when I screwed up my pulls I only saw double figure gaps once this week, and by and large the gaps stayed similar which is really good.
scaredypants
Full Member
…and then the results computer decided to count @scaredypants (unclassified at the start) as a B after all which boosted you up into frappe.😬😬
(Soz)Ohhhhh ZP has me back as a cat B now.
scaredypantsFull MemberAh, just looked at yours db, where it says “minimum category”, mine just says 59 races with no letter
dangeourbrainFree Membermine just says 59 races with no letter
Ah, that’s how it denotes sandbaggers 😉
w00dsterFull MemberHave the changed the rules on ZwiftPower regarding rankings? I’m a C on Zwiftpower now. I’ve only done 13 races, but tend to be about 3.7 to 3.9. I thought that made me a B?
My plan for tonight was to try and be a bridge, so sitting second or third wheel, if someone on front was pulling big numbers, I’d try and sit at 3.7 (about 260 watts), thinking that would make it manageable for the guys behind. Was good fun, I prefer that to a race as I’m much better at just churning out a steady number of watts, its surges that kill me.dangeourbrainFree MemberI’m a C on Zwiftpower now. I’ve only done 13 races, but tend to be about 3.7 to 3.9. I thought that made me a B?
You’re a B on my screen!
yanbossFull MemberThanks all, really enjoyed that. The team aspect properly makes you push. Now just need to make up for a summer of doing nothing and get those numbers going up.
robbo1234bikingFree MemberHad a look at my numbers to the others and I really cocked that up. I didn’t put down any consistent power and was spiking my power all over the place which I think did me over. 600W at one point and from what I can tell it wasn’t even getting up a hill. Compared to haloric who put out a nice consistent power throughout.
You live and learn – back next week! Looks like 2 laps of sand and sequoias.
Possible to get two teams out next week as well…
tpbiker, twisty, oopnorth, weeksy, ivandobski, peesbee, retrorick
Have all done or shown an interest in the TTT before!
haloricFree Member> Compared to haloric who put out a nice consistent power throughout.
The red line is the red line. The engine needs changing before the next race though, the pistons are seized this morning, and the chassis could lose 9kg and still be borderline to make the team.
robbo1234bikingFree Memberintervals.icu
It is free and links to your Strava so you need to use Strava (although you can literally just use that link into intervals).
It is a pretty good analysis tool especially as it is free!
retrorickFull MemberHopefully I will be TT’ing next week.
Wouldn’t mind being in the 2nd team with the comms left open so it’ll be easier to understand each others effort. Would that work? Or would there be a problem with having 2 teams user the same stw discord channel?dangeourbrainFree MemberI guess we could Always split it if needed anyhow, but it’s not like there’s a lot of talking after the go.
savoyadFull MemberI’ve put one (for now) entry in for next week.
Thursday 7:40pm, 2x Sand & Sequoias (42km)
Enter category A here : https://www.zwift.com/events/view/1106597I’ll do a separate post in a sec picking up on @robbo1234biking’s idea of beating a drum to see if we can tempt enough riders to form two teams.
savoyadFull MemberLet’s see if there’s enough interest to get a second team going, maybe just once, maybe all winter. Who knows?
I’ve tagged this post (below) with my best effort at a big online stalker list to summon everyone who might be interested to this thread – if I’ve missed people, point them this way!
It isn’t necessarily administratively simple. I have no idea how the “clubs” who put out multiple teams manage to administer it. @kelvinshuffle, @mrhoppy and others involved with those setups might know. I’ll just follow the consensus on here.
Here are some possibilities. I don’t want to just impose one. But I don’t want to prompt the most boring debate in the history of the forum either. Best to just alight on one soonish and then see how it goes:
Option 1 – enter two teams in the same time slot and category. So just one entry link, and we can allocate between the two here on the forum and then by simply updating name tags on zwiftpower in time for the start
Option 2 – enter two teams in different time slots, and have two entry links. either decide actively here on the forum how to divide riders between the teams (i.e. organise it) or just let people choose freely according to availability (i.e. leave rider distribution to chance).
Option 3 – organise everything initially on the forum, and deal with entry and tags last once things are decided. (I think this option would be a time consuming car crash, fwiw!).
Option 4 (hanging over it all) – there’ll soon be a fortnightly TTT on Tuesdays as part of the new Zwift Racing League. Someone will surely crack soon and volunteer to organise STW involvement in that, so things might get more complex re TTTs at least every other week. But it could be a way to ease into two teams.
Anyway, speak up if you want to get involved in a two team setup.
Here (based on people who have ridden previously, have admitted to being interested but not yet taken part, or already ride elsewhere but might be tempted to change loyalty) is that list:
@kelvinshuffle, @garry_lager, @weeksy, @trail_rat, @mooman, @phil56, @ivandobski, @ljarch, @dangeourbrain, @dknwhy, @zilog6128, @tiger6791, @piemonster, @robbo1234biking, @twisty, @eat_more_cheese, @haloric, @mrhoppy, @kirky72, @tpbiker, @retrorick, @yanboss, @scaredypants, @poopscoop, @oopnorth, @nixie, @tomlevell, @prawny, @peesbeedangeourbrainFree MemberSomeone will surely crack soon and volunteer to organise STW involvement in that,
I thought I’d take a look at that this weekend and try coincide it with the end of Robbo’s series.
FWIW I think option 1 is the way to go. I’m not sure (personally) that it’ll produce the best outcomes but, the consensus seems to be a split along the lines C and early B to bigger B and A.
If it gets more folks to join in I think that’s a good thing.It would be much easier to organise the team allocations etc here and allow for a bit of fluidity in terms of entries to ensure we have enough numbers in 1 team at least.
robbo1234bikingFree MemberI would go with Option 1 as well. Makes sense to keep it more informal. Also I think you want a minimum of 5 riders in each team. If we don’t reach that level then we should only enter the one team that week. Within discord I think we can have two voice servers so you just need to join the right one for the right team.
My opinion is that we should stick with a mixed approach between the teams as well.
oopnorthFree MemberI’ll try to be involved on Thursdays if possible, usual work related possible lateness applies!
Think I’d be better in the second group where I can contribute more, rather than just making up numbers and hanging on for dear life! For me it’s just being involved and having fun, so not bothered about being in the first group over the line.
zilog6128Full MemberOption 1 makes sense, potentially easier to administrate at we’d always be able to field at least one team ideally. It does make sense to have a 2nd team which is not quite as rapid I think if that’s what people want & will get more of us involved. I am happy to ride for either team, the fast team is bloody hard work but hopefully is slowly making me fitter!!
kelvinshuffleFree MemberTo give you a sense of how WKG handle it each week they have call for riders where they ask who’s available and which time slot they want, One guy then divvies those up into teams in a Google Sheet.
My instinct if most people can make one time slot then two teams in one time slot is the way to go. It doesn’t matter too much if you’re entered into the wrong category as they move team about afterwards based who was in the start pen.
As long as everyone then knows if they’re in STWGNAR or STWNOTGNAR, joins the right pen for their team, their start time and change their ZwiftPower tags accordingly you’ll be fine.
If you think you’ll end up with an Espresso team I’m happy to jump back with you folks if that helps on numbers.
kelvinshuffleFree MemberAlso when working out who’s on what team I’d suggest going off FTP Watts rather than WKG/Cat as it can be a bit misleading for all but the hilliest routes
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.