A quick comparison from available online figures tells us (16″) only;
1- 456 has a longer effective TT (Although the 18″ Alpine is almost as long as the 16″ 456)
2- 456 has a Slacker HA
3- 456 has slacker Seat angle
4- both bikes have about the same length chainstays…
for your 140mm fork OP I’d knock ~1/2 a degree off the Alpine and add ~1/2 a degree to the 456 angles perhaps, but the difference remains about the same obviously…
From the numbers, I’d expect the Apline to climb a smidge better and still be a confident, perhaps more “Nimble” handling bike on technical stuff, by comparison I’d expect the 456 to be more stable at speed and on steep sections…
Static HA means a minimal amount for HTs really, because that’s just a number, as soo as you sit on the thing and the fork sags, that HA starts to change.
ahwiles point about TT makes good sense, a Slack HA puts the front wheel further out front, to help with stability and prevent that “wheel Tucking under sensation on steep sections” but a longer TT goes some way towards achieving this also, the 456 Evo has a longer TT (Size for Size) and a slacker HA, so you’ll get a longer, more stable, DH bike-esque wheelbase from it, but those are not the only factors affecting how a HT rides…
If it’s for DH use only? I’d plump for the 456 (cheaper too), if you do want to be able to climb a little more and have a more “Alrounder” type of a bike Maybe think more about the Alpine.
*Declared interest: I am a happy 456 owner…