Home Forums Chat Forum What would it take for their to be a revolution in the UK?

Viewing 40 posts - 41 through 80 (of 233 total)
  • What would it take for their to be a revolution in the UK?
  • willard
    Full Member

    I have a strong suspicion that throwing poo counts as assault, so throwing it at the police or a politician ay not be a good idea.

    The best way to effect change is by voting. if none of the parties represents what you want, form your own party and try and convince as many people as possible to vote for you. If enough people like you get in, you can effect really change.

    Chewkw… You really do need to lay off the hallucinogens for a while.

    cheekyboy
    Free Member

    The best way to effect change is by voting. if none of the parties represents what you want, form your own party and try and convince as many people as possible to vote for you. If enough people like you get in, you can effect really change.

    If you cant be bovvered with all that palava you could always volunteer for some arduous volunteer work in some real poverty stricken part of the world, work hard do good things and learn what real shiteholes are really like, then you can come back here all sanctimonious and tell us how lucky we are 😀

    gordimhor
    Full Member

    chewkw Pookw

    El-bent
    Free Member

    Major house price crash, or a proper national bankruptcy… maybe a small change.

    But,

    +1 Glorious walk around the Surrey Hills this morning – hard to imagine anywhere better!

    Failure of a class of people to identify and help with the circumstances of others for a start. If this country continues to slowly creep backwards, A revolution maybe on the cards in a few decades.

    We are too spineless to deal with it sooner.

    IdleJon
    Free Member

    tpbiker – Member
    If there are those who genuinely think the UK is a shite hole need to get out and spend time in other countries
    well said

    That’s not a great argument is it?

    Things don’t need to change because other countries are worse? That attitude could be the reason there’ll never be a revolution in this country.

    ernie_lynch
    Free Member

    The best way to effect change is by voting. if none of the parties represents what you want, form your own party and try and convince as many people as possible to vote for you. If enough people like you get in, you can effect really change.

    I think the EU might have something to say about “real change”.

    If you want real change, revolutionary change, as the OP suggests and which is apparently the subject matter of this thread, then you will have to go further than changing parliamentary representation.

    Otherwise just be satisfied with the status quo beyond not much more than a bit of tinkering.

    singlespeedstu
    Full Member

    110/148mm spacing seems enough for some people.

    chewkw
    Free Member

    willard – Member
    I have a strong suspicion that throwing poo counts as assault, so throwing it at the police or a politician ay not be a good idea.

    Ya, poo throwing becomes an assault. You do know that if you touch them (i.e. other people) it becomes an assault too? So why not make the best out of it by using poo? When you are charged at the police station everyone gets a big laugh at being poo thrown.

    Imagine thousand of people throwing poo then it gets into big news then it becomes the norm of protest and no longer a “proper” assault. It then becomes the laughing stock of the world and the politicians would be taken the mickey out of them, when they gather they would greet each other with “How’s your poo nowadays? Get any? You need to get them to change their diet you know.”.

    The moral of the story if you want to be a ZM then you should be able to handle poo … 😆

    edit: oh ya if you want your poo to stink to high heaven then eat plenty of red meat …

    wilburt
    Free Member

    we dont need a revolution we need young people to vote, and baby boomers to die off.

    whatnobeer
    Free Member

    The papers all seem to be terrified for a lefty Labour party leader, so maybe that will do it.

    ernie_lynch
    Free Member

    The papers all seem to be terrified for a lefty Labour party leader

    They claim not to be.

    joolsburger
    Free Member

    There won’t be a revolution because most of us love it here. I’m very interested in the practical, deliverable suggestions the OP has for the country post revolution or is this just a general purpose whine?

    gordimhor
    Full Member

    We need winter because it says here

    ernie_lynch
    Free Member

    There won’t be a revolution because most of us love it here.

    I think the suggestion here is a political revolution rather than a cultural revolution. There is some evidence of widespread public dissatisfaction with politics and politicians. Although none to suggest that it has reach the point of revolutionary fervour.

    joolsburger
    Free Member

    Like the recent fairly convincing victory for the Tories you mean? A nation gets the government it votes for. There were options and that was the result, shitty options I’ll grant you.

    whatnobeer
    Free Member

    Like the recent fairly convincing victory for the Tories you mean? A nation gets the government it votes for. There were options and that was the result, shitty options I’ll grant you.

    Shitty options indeed 🙁

    ernie_lynch
    Free Member

    Like the recent fairly convincing victory for the Tories you mean?

    I think it’s stretching it a bit to call it a “fairly convincing victory”. I don’t think there’s ever been a ruling party in government in the UK that has won so little support from the electorate as this present government did.

    There have been rare examples of parties winning slightly less percentage of the vote but on a much bigger turnout.

    The Tories actually got only 25% of the total possible electoral vote in May, correct me if I’m wrong but no other party imo has ever won a general election with so few votes.

    And don’t forget they only have a working majority of 12.

    So not a convincing victory for the Tories imo.

    mt
    Free Member

    Humans are very selfish and will only work together if they can see its better for them individually or their family. We are not ants.
    The idea of working for the common good is a selfish act as its seen by those that do it (a lot of us) as better for them and their family, which is a selfish attitude. The problem we have if we want a revolution is persuading enough people that it is better for them in the medium to long term.

    mogrim
    Full Member

    Humans are very selfish and will only work together if they can see its better for them individually or their family. We are not ants.

    Humans really aren’t that selfish. We form families and tribes, and will quite easily sacrifice ourselves for others.

    codybrennan
    Free Member

    Surprised no-one’s quoted Trotsky: 3 square meals, absence of.

    gordimhor
    Full Member

    Mogrim +1

    cheekyboy
    Free Member

    The problem we have if we want a revolution is persuading enough people that it is better for them in the medium to long term.

    This is totally totalitarian man 😆

    IdleJon
    Free Member

    Asking a bunch of mainly middle class, middle aged men who can afford an expensive hobby about revolution maybe asking the wrong crowd?

    wrecker
    Free Member

    What would labours % been? In fact, add up labour, the lib dems and the SNP, what % would they have got?
    Of those that cared sufficiently to vote the Tories got 37 odd %. uKIP got 12%, so nearly half between them.
    To say that the left has been hard done by and is somehow the most popular view in the UK just isn’t true. People are lamenting that blair and co were too right wing, but they actually won elections.
    Labour can shift to the left, and probably should, we need a choice but don’t blame them if the spend years in opposition as a result (and of course, they won’t stand a chance if they don’t get the scottish vote back).

    irc
    Free Member

    The Tories actually got only 25% of the total possible electoral vote in May, correct me if I’m wrong but no other party imo has ever won a general election with so few votes.

    Correct me if I’m wrong but Labour won the 2005 election according to wikipaedia with 35.2% of a 61.4% turnout. My maths makes that 21.6% of the total possible electoral vote. Makes the current govt look for more legit despite the smaller majority. Time we had that boundary review I think.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_general_election,_2005

    Stoatsbrother
    Free Member

    and STV or some other form of PR. No party has had real mandate for many many years

    Tom_W1987
    Free Member

    House prices halving and old people having their benefits cut would probably do it.

    The reason why their has yet to be a revolution is that the legal avenues for voicing political opinion have yet to be exhausted, people still think they can make a difference by voting. Once people feel that their lives are no longer under their own control and they have no way of venting those feelings and changing the direction of their lives legally, they resort to reactionary behaviour. You also have to believe that your life could be better but that there are external constraints stopping it from being better – the issue with the British is that we have stopped believing that our lives could be better – we are a country stuck in post-colonial negativism – we believe things are only going to get worse.

    Tom_W1987
    Free Member

    Actually humans aren’t selfish. It’s one of the principle reasons why humans have been successful. You would struggle to find another species of mammals as selfless as humans.

    Selflessness is an evolutionary form of selfishness. As you said it yourself, we are successful because we cooperate – don’t let that deceive you into thinking that humans won’t **** over their fellow man if doing so benefits them more than cooperation.

    Three_Fish
    Free Member

    We form families and tribes…

    Why do ‘we’ do that?

    Tom_W1987
    Free Member

    tou’re confusing social change with military conflict. I suppose another thing we need for revolution is for people like you to keep right out of it. Just watch how the grown-ups do it.

    I’m with Chewkw, as Che put it…..what’s a revolution without guns? Almost all true revolutions involve violent conflict, peaceful revolution is an exception to the norm. The social and institutional constructs that limit the political avenues of the masses almost always necessitate armed conflict, as those holding power are almost always violently opposed to threats to their power. Otherwise the elites would give the masses avenues of political outlet. The greatest trick played by the western elite, has been to understand this concept.

    mt
    Free Member

    We form tribes because its better for us individually and our family (stability, food supply, security), its actually a selfish act of survival. We can appear to being selfless but it’s done for reasons other than the collective. Like those that are truly selfish and would step on anyone to get things their way, we make a cost benefit analysis on what’s best for us and those we consider family. Fortunately for a good portion of people many decide that not shitting on everyone around them is not best for themselves.

    Want a revolution in the UK? Get as many people as possible to see that things would be better if your ideas would be better for them. Simple really.

    wanmankylung
    Free Member

    Like the recent fairly convincing victory for the Tories you mean? A nation gets the government it votes for.

    The nation in which I live has one government with limited powers which it voted for and one UK wide government which it rejected massively. Despite there only being 1 our of 59 MPs a Tory, and 56 out of 59 being SNP we end up with a government that my nation did not vote for.

    globalti
    Free Member

    If this country is a shitehole, why are half of Africa, the Middle East and the Asian subcontinent desperate to get in here?

    People who say stupid things like that against the country that feeds, shelters and cures them get right up my nose. They need to go and spend a few weeks in a proper shithole like Lagos or Cairo or Kinshasa to understand just how damned lucky they are to live here. It has its faults but it’s one of the best countries in the world in the balance it offers.

    Tom_W1987
    Free Member

    Want a revolution in the UK? Get as many people as possible to see that things would be better if your ideas would be better for them. Simple really.

    Not simple, you don’t convince people with ideas and you don’t convince them over night. You manipulate their feelings over decades and slowly bring to boil emotional issues. People do not think rationally, you have to make them FEEL like they have no other choice than to riot.

    wanmankylung
    Free Member

    People who say stupid things like that against the country that feeds, shelters and cures them get right up my nose.

    I feed, shelter and cure myself. What is your point exactly?

    whatnobeer
    Free Member

    If this country is a shitehole, why are half of Africa, the Middle East and the Asian subcontinent desperate to get in here?

    It’s a worse shithold over there? Just because it could be worse doesn’t mean the UK couldn’t be a lot better than it is now.

    Tom_W1987
    Free Member

    Arguably the UK is less of a hole because we do complain, whinge and whine about things. The Philippines is a dump because the people are ridiculously happy, believe in god a bit too much and just let their politicians get on with being corrupt jerks.

    Saying that you have no right to complain smacks of sneering tory elitism.

    irc
    Free Member

    I feed, shelter and cure myself. What is your point exactly?

    What? Grow all your own food, built your own house, and don’t use the NHS. Respect!

    esselgruntfuttock
    Free Member

    Any revolution in Britain won’t come from within.

    Mark my words, & I’m not Enoch Powell.

    wanmankylung
    Free Member

    What? Grow all your own food, built your own house, and don’t use the NHS. Respect!

    That’s a nonsense interpretation.

Viewing 40 posts - 41 through 80 (of 233 total)

The topic ‘What would it take for their to be a revolution in the UK?’ is closed to new replies.