According to you then my 32:20 doesnt qualify me as an “athlete”
Nope, but it means you’re freaking excellent runner, who would likely place or top 10 in all but regional races upwards.
The Swedish Chef – that would put some very very good runners out of the athlete category.
It would, so let me explain.
I’ve had the privilege to meet a number of excellent runners, and also a fair few “athletes” from various sports, running, cycling, rowing, tri. If we’re talking gross generalizations, and we are ’cause this is an internet forum and not face to face, then I’d say the difference between an “athlete” and someone who is very good at their sport is their ability to excel at other sports. Unfortunately a fair few excellent runners can not lift their own body weight etc, and thus fail when attempting others sports. Athletes usually excel.
Where that border is I’ve no idea, but to go sub 32 for 10km, you normally need to train like an athlete rather than simply bang out miles day after day.
Not wanting to offend someone, just giving an opinion.