So someone who plays a sport regularly will be better at it than someone who’s never done it? Good
Yip, seems pretty obvious to me too. Yet most on here seem to disagree. [/quote]
I’d just like to reiterate and elaborate for you because you’re out of your depth and embarrassing yourself and Tae Kwon Do. The keystone arts in MMA for striking are Muay Thai and Boxing, although, as pointed out above most competitors are well versed in multiple styles. You should be aware that MMA striking is generally modified from a base style to suit the needs of MMA. Many UFC fighters are championship level boxers, kickboxers and Thai boxers. Some are TKD black belts but TKD alone won’t take you far in MMA.
Grappling arts in MMA consist of BJJ and Wrestling or Judo. Most competitors will be elite in at least one of these arts. Again you should note the arts are adapted for MMA.
You asserted that students at your local BJJ club would beat elite UFC fighters who you termed brawlers. You should know that the elite BJJ competitors in the UFC are considered some of the very best in the world, most are black belts. BJJ isn’t an olympic sport but most of the top grappling exponents in the UFC are world champions. The Abhu Dhabi Championship is considered the ultimate grappling test and many UFC fighters are ADCC champions. In the wrestling, there are multiple Olympians fighting in the UFC. In Judo, there are multiple Olympians fighting in the UFC.
And whilst these “brawlers” might get out pointed in the sporting dance of a TKD match, MMA is the sport of fighting. They would dominate a TKD player in a fight or MMA bout, in all of the fighting ranges. The WOMEN in the UFC would dominate them in a fight or an MMA bout 😈
HTH.