Home Forums Chat Forum Traffic!!!!! What's the answer

Viewing 40 posts - 41 through 80 (of 83 total)
  • Traffic!!!!! What's the answer
  • crazy-legs
    Full Member

    What andrewh says ^^.

    Road pricing. Short journey in the city at rush hour? Tax the hell out of it. Long journey at night on motorways? Costs peanuts. Added bonus that it can be run using ANPR cameras and if your car isn’t insured/taxed/MOT’d then when you pull up at a fuel station, the pump auto-shuts down and the system calls the police. 🙂
    I’d make a great dictator.

    And actually supply a top quality public transport system (be that buses, trams, hire bikes, trains, tube, water taxis or whatever) that’s designed to move people rather than make massive profits.

    molgrips
    Free Member

    You can’t just whack up the prices. It’ll cause hell with people’s lives. You’ll suddenly get people who were just making ends meet having to move jobs or move, either of which can be very difficult.

    You could be a tory politician with carefully thought out ideas like that 🙂

    zippykona
    Full Member

    If the roads are empty people will use them. Traffic jams are the only way of getting people out of their cars.
    If I could easily drive into town and park there, I probably would. I can’t so I don’t.

    piemonster
    Free Member

    It would help if public transport was more affordable.

    Walk up tickets on Trains can be horrendous if you can’t plan when you need to go. Been stung for £200 return from Sheffield to London before.

    And the train was rubbish, slow, broken air con, and vile food.

    molgrips
    Free Member

    And the train was rubbish, slow, broken air con, and vile food.

    I bet it was full though eh?

    muckytee
    Free Member

    Don’t even mention public transport, it is useless – I would know I use everyday to go everywhere, since I don’t have a car yet

    I have already said what needs to be done.

    Since atm there is no viable alternative to using a car to get about in this country.

    Trains pphah! chances you’ll be stuck in the same traffic on a rail replacement service 🙄

    Owning a car is costly enough, increasing tax will not change anything apart from making peoples lives a misery.

    piemonster
    Free Member

    @Molgrips

    Absolutely rammed, it’s amazing that a service so heavily used. With such high fares can be so badly delivered.

    andrewh
    Free Member

    I wasn’t talking about increasing total tax, I was talking about changing it, Crazy Legs has got it. And I like his petrol pump idea.
    Far too many people are making journeys by car which are totally unnecessary. In my office for example we have car users who drive 2 miles, 2miles from a different direction, 2 miles from the same place as the second person (why don’t they share?!) and 1.5 miles. I ride 8 miles and one gets the bus 15 miles becasue she doesn’t have a car.
    I have raced one of the 2 mile people home to his house, me running, him driving. Guess who won?
    We need to get people to stop making these journeys, in a way that doesn’t just stop the poorer people doing it leaving the roads clear for the wealthy. It is just lazyness, people would rather sit in traffic for 30 minutes than walk for 20. I just don’t understand them.
    .
    I still think carbon rationing is the way to go.

    samuri
    Free Member

    Place snipers on bridges and give ’em a die. They roll every minute. They get a six, clip a driver.

    piemonster
    Free Member

    I think there might be quite a few people who commute more than 2 miles

    You’re gonna have a hard time getting that chubster I work with push biking to work 30 miles a day

    I’m happy to run or bike to work, I doubt the majority are though.

    samuri
    Free Member

    But really..

    I bet 30-40% of people on the road just sit at a desk when they get to work. Haven’t they got a desk at home? Get them one. There you go, they can work from home now. It’s so frigging obviously it defies belief.

    LordSummerisle
    Free Member

    I stood in amazement at the fact the have closed the hard shoulder for 8? miles.

    the hard shoulder of the M62 is shut from J25 (brighouse) to J29 (M1), with average speed cameras & a 50mph limit too. but it chocca with traffic most days and a lot of accidents (seemingly between J26&J27 mostly, there have been 2 major accidents eastbound in the last 7 days and at least one west bound in the same period)

    nwilko
    Free Member

    as traffic gets worse slowly over time society is always re-adjusting to the new normal congestion hence ppl will always to a degree remain happy to sit in their car listen to tunes and moan about everyone else causing the traffic. In the case of the OP and all those in a similar position the logical step is smaller patches, shorter working hours and a form of job share so your company can cover the workload nationally with more ppl for the same cost but could you / would you say halve your pay / working week to deliver your job / service in a more sustainable way (id guess the answer is no), same goes for most ppl, avoid the rush hour by staggering start times but no one would take a 2am start time etc, etc.. so mankind will continue embracing the motor car regadless.. much like the DR Who episode with ppl stuck in a traffic jam that had not ever moved..

    nwilko
    Free Member

    as for the prior mentioned carbon rationing, how would a weeks biking trip to the highlands be justifiable for a holiday if you live 400miles away when compared to someone needing to drive 20miles by car to work every day ?
    are you 100% sure you would have enough ration stamps..

    muckytee
    Free Member

    I see what you’re saying, makes sense.

    I have raced one of the 2 mile people home to his house, me running, him driving. Guess who won?

    Yes but they didn’t arrive all hot and sweaty. That being the argument against bikes/running.

    It is just lazyness, people would rather sit in traffic for 30 minutes than walk for 20. I just don’t understand them.

    Most people will object to walking because of the weather, I’m fine with a bit of rain – just water. But others will whinge.

    Northwind
    Full Member

    Lots of good suggestions for how to fix traffic in general.

    How to fix specific personal traffic problems, if relocating/telecommuting is impossible, is less wheels.

    samuri
    Free Member

    My company employs over a thousand people who just sit in front of a computer, answer the phone and follow prompts on a screen. I can make that happen in their house. Really easily, securely and cheaply.

    But then the supervisors can’t watch them.

    I can give them software that allows them to watch them.

    Nope.

    A thousand commuters off the roads. But it’s more important we keep our beady eye right on them physically. Cock off! Big picture people, I’m giving it to you.

    piemonster
    Free Member

    Working in Logistics, it’s easy to see a requirement for somebody to actually be there.

    I’d be interested to hear just how many people could work from home(any statistics?), additionally what would the negative implications be. There is a significant social aspect in going to work, especially when talking about the unwashed masses who enjoy some damn fine banter in the workplace. Personally I do not like to socialise with people from work, but many do (e.g. the post shift pint)

    Would we be at risk of damaging social structures by inhibiting peoples ability to meet other people through the workplace?

    I think I’d miss calling someone a “stupid ******* halfwit ****” to there face.

    retro83
    Free Member

    piemonster – Member
    Working in Logistics, it’s easy to see a requirement for somebody to actually be there.

    I’d be interested to hear just how many people could work from home(any statistics?), additionally what would the negative implications be. There is a significant social aspect in going to work, especially when talking about the unwashed masses who enjoy some damn fine banter in the workplace. Personally I do not like to socialise with people from work, but many do (e.g. the post shift pint)

    Would we be at risk of damaging social structures by inhibiting peoples ability to meet other people through the workplace?

    It’s not just socialising after work, it’s just interacting with people through the day that I missed. It’s very depressing. Plus there’s the **** to think about.

    Papa_Lazarou
    Free Member

    Culture needs to change so working from home is the norm – many of those people sat in cars every day don’t need to drive to an office to use a pc and phone.

    I apprecaite some jobs can’t be done on this basis, but many can and enough to make a big diffence to traffic and pollution levels.

    Sandwich
    Full Member

    I think I’d miss calling someone a “stupid ******* halfwit ****” to there face.

    The ironing!

    Papa_Lazarou
    Free Member

    Plus there’s the **** to think about.

    I thought “working from home” was an euphemism for ****ing

    samuri
    Free Member

    Call centres are a great example. Large groups of people, they are monitored at work not by a human but by a computer so their response rates, responses, activity and handling speed are all logged away and analysed. If they all work from home the monitoring doesn’t change in the slightest. They can’t bunk off although they can work in the nude.

    They can, using this method, look after children, elderly people and not be a fire hazard if they’re in a wheelchair or are otherwise physically disabled. In fact, this is an excellent way of providing employment for people who struggle to leave the house for whatever reason.

    Obviously there is a downside. We now have to heat and power a thousand houses through the day rather than one office.

    crazy-legs
    Full Member

    You can’t just whack up the prices. It’ll cause hell with people’s lives. You’ll suddenly get people who were just making ends meet having to move jobs or move, either of which can be very difficult.

    The thing with a car that’s different to most other modes of transport is that it’s a very large initial outlay to buy the thing but then the costs just tick by almost unnoticed unless you’re faced with a particularly large garage bill. Fuel is £20 here and there, insurance goes out monthly by direct debit – car tax is the only big yearly outlay.

    So most people have no idea how much their journey costs them. It’s effectively “free” – I can drive 500 miles and apart from having an empty tank when I get there, the journey has cost me nothing upfront so it’s perceived as free (it obviously isn’t, but that’s the perception).

    Contrast that with the bus/train etc where you need to stump up the cash every day and can see it disappearing and you’ve got nothing to show for it other than you managed to turn up at your destination within a few hours of when the train company promised.

    So the road pricing idea works on a number of levels cos it forces people to think about the individual cost of that journey. Cut fuel duty, cut “road tax” (I’m using the term ironically, I know it’s VED) and get that money instead by road pricing. Large costs for short journeys at peak times in the city. Very low costs for rural journeys/non-peak time/motorways etc. And a cheap, reliable public transport system to encourage something other than car use.

    klumpy
    Free Member

    Live close to where you work.

    And your wife works. And your kid(s) go to school(s).

    Stop going to so many meetings.

    SOME people need to change their attitude regarding this, but IME it’s not usually them actually going to the meeting!

    At my old job, they told a huge load of people that their new place of work was 2 hours drive away. I told them to shove it. Some folks who felt less confident and with families to support couldn’t. They now suffer that commute for the sake of not uprooting their families.

    Just another example of how commuting by car ain’t necessarily a selfish pursuit. (Disclosure: I cycled and walked for 11 yrs, currently use a small motorbike, and have no wife or kids.)

    JCL
    Free Member

    A cull. There are too many people on such a small island who all want cars, more roads will result in more cars.

    Exactly. Too many people breeding like rats. There are no such thing as traffic jams, climate change, habitat destruction etc, they are simply a result of overpopulation. 80 f*cking million of us parasites every year yet the moron public and media think turning the lights off for an hour once a year or buying recycled sh*t rag will make everything okay.

    jfletch
    Free Member

    Road pricing is an stupid idea.

    Its eletist and means the rich get to travel on clearer roads while the poor sit in jams. At least fuel duty and VED means everyone pays the same. Maybe road pricing should be means tested! 😯

    Any sort of increase in road pricing has to be combined with a viable, cheaper alternative, otherwise its just a tax on jobs.

    Nottingham have tried a novel scheme taxing businesses based on the number of parking spaces a business has. But its bollocks, the business just pass the costs on to employees as parking fees or reduced wages, but once the employee has effecively paid for their parking space then even if they would cycle maybe a couple of days a week or during the summer they won’t as since they have paid for a space they may as well use it.

    Annecdotally, since they have introcued the scheme the congestion seems to have got worse. I’d love to see the official stats.

    crazy-legs
    Full Member

    Road pricing is an stupid idea.

    Its eletist and means the rich get to travel on clearer roads while the poor sit in jams. At least fuel duty and VED means everyone pays the same. Maybe road pricing should be means tested!

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-18064363

    http://www.iea.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/files/upldbook427pdf.pdf

    The pdf article is very good.

    molgrips
    Free Member

    Absolutely rammed, it’s amazing that a service so heavily used. With such high fares can be so badly delivered.

    Exactly. These are the people who aren’t paying their own fares. So the idea is to charge them a lot to subsidise the people who do have to pay their own fares ie leisure travellers.

    The fact that everyone wants to be somewhere for 9am and leave at 5pm is a massive problem for transport logistics, obviously.

    piemonster
    Free Member

    The best Mon-Fri shift I’ve had was 11am to 7pm.

    Get up, couple of hours on the bike/run. Bike to work, home for tea and time for the pub and much better traffic.

    Used to do a 4 days on/off shift, bloody loved that. Never commuted in a rush hour and still got a 37.5hr week. And always had long weekends. Loved it. Didn’t start until 10am so still had time for a bike/run pre-work. It was barely a mile to commute(along a quiet country lane) as well, I’d often walk it.

    joao3v16
    Free Member

    it’s amazing that a service so heavily used. With such high fares can be so badly delivered.

    Not really. Poor customer service and doing the absolute minimum required is one thing that Britain does really well.

    Also, when you’ve got a captive audience and no real competition why bother spending money on improving things?

    molgrips
    Free Member

    Poor customer service and doing the absolute minimum required is one thing that Britain does really well.

    Haha.. not been to the US then?

    ransos
    Free Member

    I seem to recall that the majority of car journeys are less than 5 miles…

    orangetoaster
    Free Member

    Can’t say I encounter much traffic on untarmacced roads.

    piemonster
    Free Member

    I seem to recall that the majority of car journeys are less than 5 miles…

    Some guff from Sustrans here: http://www.sustrans.org.uk/assets/files/connect2/guidelines%2016.pdf

    piemonster
    Free Member

    Some more guff from officialdom here:
    https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/8932/nts2010-01.pdf

    Between 1995/97 and 2010, overall trips rates fell by 12%. Trips by private modes of transport fell by 14% while public transport modes increased by 8%. Walking trips saw the largest decrease.

    djglover
    Free Member

    To andrewh’s point. The main drawback of any Time of Use plan is that it effectively prices out the poor, and will probably reverse any glimmer of social mobility we have in this country!

    MrAgreeable
    Full Member

    Renationalise the railways?

    According to news reports out today, since privatisation we’ve tipped £28 billion into a black hole full of extortionate season tickets, horrible sandwiches and crap bicycle storage.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-20440937

    crazy-legs
    Full Member

    To andrewh’s point. The main drawback of any Time of Use plan is that it effectively prices out the poor, and will probably reverse any glimmer of social mobility we have in this country!

    Have a read of this that I linked to earlier.

    http://www.iea.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/files/upldbook427pdf.pdf

    piemonster
    Free Member

    WHOA there Crazy-legs

    Im to lazy to walk to the shop, let alone do some reading.

    25 pages, bloody war n peace or something

Viewing 40 posts - 41 through 80 (of 83 total)

The topic ‘Traffic!!!!! What's the answer’ is closed to new replies.