DaveRambo – Member
This whole Clarkson thing is interesting in how it polarizes people.
Good. The bureaucrats should be shaken up a bit more. 😈
Who appoint these bureaucrats on tax payers money anyway?
nickc – Member
Someone on the forum complaint about the term so I just used ZM in order not to offend people
To be completely accurate about these things( and who here doesn’t like accuracy, hmmmm? )
The complaint was about the fact that you use the term in every single one of your posts (and appear to continue to do so) thus rendering it dull, repetitive, unfunny, and equally applicable to you.. [/quote]
I cannot remember who asked me not use those words so out of sympathy I changed it … a bit.
But the fact is that those people are exactly how I described them to be and if you look closely, deep down, they are really as described no matter how you try to rationalise them they are what they are. You might not find them funny but truth is not funny at all sometimes. I use that description because it sums them up nicely IMO.
Klunk – Member
bit of a bugger for clarkson if he is convicted of ABH, no more US road trips.
If he is convicted of ABH then this whole drama is now becoming so stooopid i.e. especially the law and the police trying to stick their nose into uncalled for event, that someone should firebomb those who start this sort of investigation. I don’t pay my tax to investigate one bloke throwing handbag at another bloke. If they really are getting nosey about giving the person an ABH. Then someone should start something like Assault on Precinct 13. Makes not sense at all with these ZMs 👿