Blimey, I can’t believe I’ve been away for the weekend and not only is this thread is still ticking along, but Smee seems to be gaining supporters like some kind of strange cult leader.
A few of the more interesting replies:
avdave2: Under current discrimination laws… 50% seems to be the politically correct answer.
Nah you’d still be discriminating on sex. You’d be safer saying you were 100% that they were a person – though obviously ethereal lifeforms should also have equal rights. 🙂
Junkyard: Don’t know or care whether any of this is correct just going for the 10 pages and will argue with you if it help GrahamS
I think Smee is doing enough trolling for everyone on this thread!
avdave2:please show me in the question where it specifically asks us to determine the chances of the woman having had the children in a specific order.
It doesn’t. But it is the reason why there are twice as many “boy and girl” combinations as there are “girl and girl”. In the initial population, 25% will be “two boys”, 50% will be “girl and boy”, 25% will be “two girls”.
Smee:The only idiocy that is going on is people not realising that both solutions are correct…..
For the question that I gave there is only one correct answer and that is 66.666..%
That is not really debatable. You can go and physically count the results on that spreadsheet and it comes to 66%. If you don’t trust the spreadsheet you can replicate the experiment yourself using coins and it is 66%. You can even do what Marilyn vos Savant did when she ran a poll of her readers and, with 18,000 replies, it came out almost exactly at 66%.
You might not like or understand the reasoning, but the result is not debatable.
I’m sure 50% is the “correct solution” to many interesting questions, but just not this one.
I notice that you still haven’t replied what you think the correct values are for your earlier post:
Out of the 4 combinations you have all ruled out boy/boy.
That leaves
girl/boy
boy/girl
girl/girl
show me how to figure out the probability that the first one is a boy…
I said 33% and explained why. I think you said 50% for each of them, but failed to explain why your probabilities added up to 150%.