Talkemada - Blocked
 

Subscribe now and choose from over 30 free gifts worth up to £49 - Plus get £25 to spend in our shop

[Closed] Talkemada - Blocked

302 Posts
114 Users
0 Reactions
1,299 Views
Posts: 23221
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Already? Is that some sort of personal best?


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 12:36 pm
Posts: 293
Free Member
 

What did he do this time?


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 12:38 pm
Posts: 57
Free Member
 

Why?
I haven't seen anything special he's written recently...


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 12:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yesterday it happened. According to him he has had no explanation of why by the mods and as far as I saw he did nothing that was any worse than many STWers.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 12:38 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

Really?

Blimey that didn't take long. I thought he was doing a pretty good job of behaving himself this time.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 12:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

they will re-ban folk who are obviously returned bannee's won't they?

'tis a shame, I like Fred 🙂


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 12:41 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50453
 

Maybe this rule

Any attempt to circumvent any suspension by re-registering or using the account of another forum user could result in a lifetime ban from the forum.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 12:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

only if it's a life time ban

not many of them get handed out i don't think

the prawn got one


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 12:42 pm
Posts: 8765
Full Member
 

well done, fred

*slow clap*


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 12:46 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50453
 

Well he's be banned several times now under different accounts so once they know it's him they seem to ban him again.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 12:46 pm
 tron
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Any attempt to circumvent any suspension by re-registering or using the account of another forum user could result in a lifetime ban from the forum.

I can't see how that would actually be done. You'd have to play whack-a-mole every time the bannee re-registered and started spouting off.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 12:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

That is such a shame - I enjoy discussing/arguing/contradicting with him - he might be a bit outspoken at times but he is clearly intelligent and able to hold his own.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 12:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

think you might be witnessing it in action, tron. 😀


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 12:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

psychle - Member

they will re-ban folk who are obviously returned bannee's won't they?

Drac - Member

Maybe this rule

Any attempt to circumvent any suspension by re-registering or using the account of another forum user could result in a lifetime ban from the forum.

Well in that case Ton should be banned - got banned under the name of Bombadillo for being racist.

AdamG registered with another name after being banned, there are many others.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 12:48 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

It was quite fun while it lasted.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 12:48 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50453
 

[i]I can't see how that would actually be done.[/i]

Some people are easy to spot in their persona's so just a case of waiting until they give themselves away, then there's IP bans.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 12:49 pm
Posts: 34062
Full Member
 

jesus the torys only been in a few days and theyre taking out the lefties already

"THEY CAME FIRST for the Communists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist.

THEN THEY CAME for the Jews,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew.

THEN THEY CAME for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist.

THEN THEY CAME for me
and by that time no one was left to speak up."

*im not sure what category fred fell into


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 12:49 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

It's been known for a while - seems odd to me.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 12:50 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50453
 

[i]Well in that case Ton should be banned - got banned under the name of Bombadillo for being racist.

AdamG registered with another name after being banned, there are many others. [/i]

There is and they seem to have given them a chance and since have behaved. Fred has always been a bit destructive in his other names. This time I'd say he's just been a bit of an arse at times, I never seen anything bad but they had banned him.

On top of that it says 'could' not will.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 12:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Surely they are banning the person, not the "user name"? If the person comes back with another user name but continues to be a knob then he/she would be banned as soon as it was discovered. That's how I understand it anyway.

🙂


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 12:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's OK, he's full time occupied arguing about Photoshop with me by email 🙂


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 12:52 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

thought he wasm much better this tim ena more well behave dthan before. I liked his contributions and dont fully agree with the decision.
I suspect he got many many warnings in previous lifes and they just cannot be bothered with him this time...shame as it clear who he is

TJ Ton is not a racist IMHO I know him off forum. Not sure what he posted up though as Bombadillo but he does occasionally say things for a reaction.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 12:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Isn't there a general bad feeling between the powers that be and Fred? If I remember there were some personal comment made about him?


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 12:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Point taken Drac and I do understand that is is Mark and cos playground not a democracy but to me this stinks - unpleasant racists get allowed to stay on the forum a stroppy get that fights these unpleasant people gets banned.

Its smacks of favouritism and unfairness.

I bet this thread does not last much longer.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 12:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Didn't a recent thread get locked down because he got a bit excited/defensive/abusive?
It's [i]their[/i] website, [i]they[/i] can do what they want I suppose....


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 12:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Junkyard - he has loads of previous and used another name to post racist stuff. To get a reaction or not it is unnacepatable


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 12:55 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50453
 

IIRC Ton sent an email apologising to the mods and explaining his mistake, Fred always just provoked them more in his childish manner he often has.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 12:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Wasn't tons thread supposed to be a wind up? (not excusing it, just can't remember)


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 12:58 pm
Posts: 14
Free Member
 

"THEY CAME FIRST for the Communists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist.

THEN THEY CAME for the Jews,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew.

THEN THEY CAME for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist.

THEN THEY CAME for me
and by that time no one was left to speak up."

*im not sure what category fred fell into

They came for him because he was a dick
I didn't speak for him because I'm not a dick and can't be bothered with dicks
That was the last I of him or them


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 12:58 pm
Posts: 6886
Free Member
 

The problem with fred in my opinion is he just talks to much, if i come on the forum at 6am he's on here equally at lunch time or in the evening he is on here. He seems alright but he does ruin some topics. Think he should allow himself 3 hours a day and actually go do other stuff.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 12:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ton ... does occasionally say things for a reaction.

You'll have to point out to me a post of his where he isn't doing that!


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:00 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50453
 

[i]stroppy get that fights these unpleasant people gets banned.[/i]

To be fair he was a very obnoxious at times to other users and loved to play the racist card. When the mods would warn him his attitude towards them was terrible at times when all he had to do was stop.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I was not particularly singling ton out - there are many others who have been banned under one name and return under another and who have been banned for worse breaches that being an annoying little git.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:02 pm
Posts: 2390
Free Member
 

Tandem, I think if you're going to call someone racist, you ought to explain yourself. We only have your word for it otherwise, and you could have misinterpreted or misunderstood what he/she wrote.

I don't care one way or the other. Just saying.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

'bombadillo', aka ton, posted some stuff which appeared to defend nick griffin and the bnp at the time of his appearance on question time. I am proud to have called him a 'nazi cock monkey' during this unfortunate episode. :P. Fred was (apparently) banned for calling someone a 'little ponce' during a debate over football - dont know whether this is a temporary or permanent measure, but as has been previously stated, there are far more objectionable people still posting on here, and I for one am proud to call fred a mate and hope to see him back, in whatever guise, asap.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:02 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50453
 

Tails I think that is part of the problem too, he deliberately buts into threads with is strong opinions just for the hell of it. Adding nothing useful to the forum and trying to make trouble it would seem.

What ever the reason it's their call and once again people are trying to defend him when the mods aren't going to change their minds.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:03 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

there was one I recall about 3 years ago.
TJ he can defend himself over what he posts I never saw the racist stuff so cannot comment but he aint one in the real world. He does like winding up PC liberal do goooders and we do occasionally make it very easy for him to rattle our cage so to speak.

Yes Fred did e-mail STW towers frequently which probably did not help matters.
How about giving him a twitter style account limited number of charachters and limited number of posts? Nothing about football either he was highly offensive on those threads


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Dorset Knob - as you can see others remember Ton making racist posts - I would have to search Tons posts and his posts as bombadillo to find them.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm pretty sure thgere will be a lot more going on behind the scenes that we aren't privy too...


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:08 pm
Posts: 31058
Free Member
 

You'll have to point out to me a post of his where he isn't doing that!

+1

He gets away with a lot.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yet again, good riddance.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:14 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

It's OK, he's full time occupied arguing about
Photoshop with me by email

*checks inbox*

Oh yeah... 🙂


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Fred has sad to me that he has tried to contact the mods several times to find our why he was banned this time and non of them will answer him. He finds it strange that Ton can apologise for being racist but Fred can't even get an explanation from the Mods.

It certainly looks like double standards and hypocrisy to me. I guess I am getting rather close to the line myself now.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:20 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50453
 

Maybe they're just bored of him now TJ, how many chances are you supposed to give someone?

That and they may well just be too busy to bother to try and get some rational from him. He could be a really nice guy I have no idea but he comes on here and acts like a complete nob most of the time.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:23 pm
 tron
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I guess I am getting rather close to the line myself now.

My theory is that STW is actually an opinion monitoring system operated by the Civil Service, masquerading as a bike forum.

That would certainly explain the generally leftist attitude on here in the past, and if your ban co-incided with a change in government - the PM gets the statistics he wants to get, and nobody stands in his way!

Edit - 😆 just in case anyone thinks I'm actually serious.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Thing is drac - he was behaving Ok this time - really no worse than quite a few of the regulars. fair point tho


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The thing with Fred i could never get is he seemed to be on here literally constantly during waking hours......very odd 😯


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Tron - generally leftist? I find it rather right wing myself.

Would you like to borrow my tinfoil hat?


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:25 pm
Posts: 5936
Full Member
 

He gets away with a lot.

Thats because he is a great big cuddly bear of a man who gives lovely hugs if you ask him nicely. [img] [/img]


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:26 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50453
 

Guess I should really have added.

The staff don't necessarily do the moding, while they may have the overall say at times a lot of the 'active' mods are volunteers who have other jobs, interests and generally may not be around. When they get an email they will filter through the important ones I guess and Fred wanting unbanned, again, is probably not a priority to them.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

TJ - you said I could borrow the hat next. Typical right wingist attitude if you ask me 😕


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:27 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

a lot of the 'active' mods are volunteers

How were they chosen?


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:27 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

[i]You'll have to point out to me a post of his where he isn't doing that![/i]

Isn't everyone doing this all of the time you tossers?


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:27 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

I have had to moderate a forum, as a part of my job. The problem with fred types is they generate too much work. If someone has been banned before I would have to watch them more closely to make sure they don't do it again. If they are on most threads all day then it can take quite a lot of time checking their chat history. Especially if they try to avoid swear filters and other "hot" words. Most people don't need to be monitored so you can get on with other work to make the site better for everyone else. If you spend half a day checking one person who can behave in an unacceptable way it would probably be in the interest of the forum/site to ban them. That way the site can be better for all the other members.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:28 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50453
 

[i]Thing is drac - he was behaving Ok this time - really no worse than quite a few of the regulars. fair point tho [/i]

He was for him certainly, even when someone insulted him. But looks like they weren't prepared to give him the chance this time.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

personally, i don't give a toss

i find it amusing that a banning results in a discussion/bun fight of this magnitude. it has more posts than most bike related threads 🙂


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:30 pm
Posts: 1083
Full Member
 

It's more entertaining when he's here. Just like it was more entertaining when glupton was here. And would be less entertaining if TJ got banned. That said I'm happy just to read the arguments, I'm too lazy to join in with them, so maybe that's why I don't find such people frustrating?


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:31 pm
 tron
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I find it rather right wing myself.

It's all relative. You're looking from a position somewhere to the left of Tony Benn 😉


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:32 pm
 ton
Posts: 24188
Full Member
 

just to clear things up a bit.

in my post as bombadillo, i asked why soft lefties were attacking a politician (mr griffin)
teej, ernie and a few others took this to be rascist.
i then proceded to wind them up for a while, until ernie verbaly attacked me saying i was a rascist.
i asked him to show me where i had been rascist ( i had not)
he failed to show me where i had been rascist.
i was banned for a week. 8)


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:33 pm
Posts: 6
Free Member
 


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm pretty sure thgere will be a lot more going on behind the scenes that we aren't privy too...

Yes there is, as Talky has just told me. Quite amusing I must say...

The thing with Fred i could never get is he seemed to be on here literally constantly during waking hours......very odd

Quite amazingly, mobile phones can be used nowadays to access the internet. Yowsers, what next eh? 😉


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:34 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50453
 

So you were banned for trolling by the sounds.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:34 pm
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

mrmichaelwright:

personally, i don't give a toss

+1.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I remember the thread!

Didn't know you got banned for it 😯

Blimey, best not say anything about anything again. EVER.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:36 pm
 ton
Posts: 24188
Full Member
 

drac.......yes, i think.

and to this day, teej and ernie have never....NEVER...proven me to be rascist... 8)


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ton - what about the gypsies? I seem to remeber you being very racist about them.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"in my post as bombadillo, i asked why soft lefties were attacking a politician (mr griffin)" And once again ton, you're shooting yourself in the foot. Nick Griffin is not a politician, he's a nazi c**t, and by describing the people who are prepared to stand up and say so
as 'soft lefties' you come over as well, if not racist, certainly reactionary.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:38 pm
 ton
Posts: 24188
Full Member
 

teej.......show me where.

and is my gran irish/roma??


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:40 pm
 ton
Posts: 24188
Full Member
 

mitch.......was he elected??


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:41 pm
Posts: 3546
Free Member
 

Think Talke started using the ponce word repeatedly again IIRC in some thread last week in a 'debate' with someone who obviously supported the Tories.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

someone who obviously supported the Tories.

far more worthy of a ban than being a bit sweary

😉 <- this indicates a degree of irony to my post people, let's not get offended


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:42 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

Ton - what about the gypsies? I seem to remeber you being very racist about them.

The opposite he always goes apesh1t on the abuse given to gypsies
EDIT:for the reason above


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

he's a nazi c**t

But your opinion of him doesn't alter the fact he IS a politician - the leader of a recognised political organisation irrespective or whether or not you agree with their views. I sometimes wonder (given how many times you have repeated yourself calling him that particular schoolyard name) how much you understand about politics and our democratic political system.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:46 pm
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

"a lot of the 'active' mods are volunteers"

How were they chosen?

This is not a democracy.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

ton - we've been there before. I dont give a fiddlers **** whether he was elected, we both know that it was done dishonestly, we both know he's a lying nazi tossbag, and what I dont get is why you seem so keen to defend him.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:47 pm
Posts: 31058
Free Member
 

ton, haven't you been ringing and emailing people and threatening them after disagreements on here? That's what I heard. Naughty thing.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:48 pm
 ton
Posts: 24188
Full Member
 

mitch....i agree with you, i aint defending him.
i never did. 8)


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:48 pm
 ton
Posts: 24188
Full Member
 

dd, who??


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:50 pm
Posts: 5936
Full Member
 

Yay... someones bitten.

Give them all a hug Ton...


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Nick Griffin is not a politician, he's a nazi <deleted>,

You're free to hold that opinion of him, but by expressing it on here in that way you're breaking the forum rules in a way that standing up for him isn't.


 
Posted : 13/05/2010 1:51 pm
Page 1 / 4