\didn’t I borrow yours Tiger when the one Stu made for me was struggling in the cold and wind last time we were out??
Shhhhhh, nope, not me guv, you what, me? gas user? nah, how dare you!, it’s just not possible….
In my defence though, Gas was completely the right choice for the conditions (apart from it freezing and not working) and the faint roar of a gas burner is a not only a prerequisite camping sound it is also a well known bear and rouge camel deterrent. You just don’t get the same effect with meths.
Also I seem to remember I got my food and cuppa on pretty sharpish while you, my friend, worried about the prospect of a cold curry and whether or not a litre of red wine has enough calroies to see you through a night.
In fact in the unspoken competitive environment of stove wars. (we all do it but never speak of it) I was only beaten by Steve on the speed to boil stakes who in fairness brought an industrial petrol based flame thrower capable of boiling water at 1.04 gal/sec. The only thing I have seen make bigger flames are the gas flue burners on a North Sea Oil rigs.
Although I did try (well, Steve insisted I try, tactics you see) some orange juice created on said petrol stove that turned out to be as hot as the sun!!! (if not actually hotter) I do remember orange juice instantly blistered my internal organs making anything my tiny Gas stove could boil taste luke warm. Had I had meths I may as well had just gone for a swim in the stream.
So what do we know:
In the unspoken clandestine stove wars Steve won with petrol.
Gas was a happy if not blistered second.
Meths lost
Anyway meths is usually the first choice.