Home Forums Chat Forum Sexism on STW (a goodbye and some thanks :) )

  • This topic has 585 replies, 183 voices, and was last updated 13 years ago by Mark.
Viewing 40 posts - 441 through 480 (of 586 total)
  • Sexism on STW (a goodbye and some thanks :) )
  • trailmonkey
    Full Member

    its simple folks. before you dare to contribute, just take a moment before you hit ‘send post’ and think………..

    what would tj do ?

    essential for saving hurt feelings and bandwidth on the internets

    MrSmith
    Free Member

    It is a reference to unconsensual sex – ie rape, and rape simply ain’t funny

    it isn’t but i thought kicking ones back doors in was bumsex? but then i though ‘gay’ was happy and jolly and a girls name, i was shocked when informed of it’s modern meaning.

    M6TTF
    Free Member

    It’s all going a bit Partridge now lol

    Cougar
    Full Member

    Not sure if I’ve ever used that phrase on here or not (I hope not given the upset it has clearly caused) but I’ve certainly read it, laughed and never ever considered it to be about rape.

    +1. I appreciate that it’s not really the nub of the issue, but I’ve never understood it to mean rape and am quite shocked that some people have.

    Maybe I’ll start a campaign to replace it with the term “gently ease open the back doors” instead. (-:

    defydude
    Free Member

    KINGTUT
    Free Member

    I know someone who once a month gets really angry, emotional and cries alot. I really really feel sorry for her. **** awful.

    I suggest you visit your mum every other month then.

    allthepies
    Free Member

    Always took it to mean a bit of “tradesmen’s” akshun. As ever the outraged minority find something to be outraged over.

    zokes
    Free Member

    As ever the outraged minority find something to be outraged over.

    +1

    Daily Mails / Guardians at the ready…

    Steve-Austin
    Free Member

    People leave forums all the time.

    zokes
    Free Member

    I’m leaving in a week. Do I get a party too?

    Gary_C
    Full Member

    People leave forums all the time.

    Indeed. I remember when TJ did his ‘flounce’, trouble is, he just couldn’t **** stay away could he ?? Why the **** did he come back ??

    And another thing, a certain ‘Lahndan’ based poster on here gets a ban or a ‘lifetime ban’ off the mods, a while later he’s back under a different posting name. How’s that work then ?

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    People leave forums all the time.

    Yes they do. But the self-examination is not about people leaving. It’s about the reasons they felt they were not welcome.

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    How’s that work then ?

    He mended his ways.

    defydude
    Free Member

    He mended his ways.

    Really?

    ernie_lynch
    Free Member

    Always took it to mean a bit of “tradesmen’s” akshun. As ever the outraged minority find something to be outraged over.

    I’ve always taken it as meaning non-consensual sex, or at the very least, some degree of resistance.

    Otherwise it would be something along the lines of “using the back door/trademen’s entrance”. Why would anyone talk about ‘kicking doors in’, if they are being ‘welcomed’ ?

    maxray
    Free Member

    12 pages!!

    It will be interesting to see which of the bastions of good moral behaviour are the first to go back to flash grenades back doors etc.

    Hopefully they will all be just as mindful about avoiding taking the rise out of overweight people, roadies etc etc etc…

    For the record I am not encouraging or condoning sexist comments of the type that have driven the op to leave, it’s the hypocrisy of a hell of a lot of people on here that grates.

    Apart from TJ who has always argued against the A&A threads I bet a lot of these sudden morally perfect posters have commented and posted on them… massive hypocrisy and jumping on the bandwagon.

    Fair play to you for always remaining as a constant TJ *dofs cap*

    bikebouy
    Free Member

    Far too many people sitting around a group theropy session huggathon if you ask me..
    Far too much naval gazing too.
    Far too introspective.
    Far too me, me, me.

    Forum members make thier own decisions to log on/off or post/not post, theres nothing more simple in that fact. They make informed choices on thier own.

    But really.. This place.. You so have to have a “give and take” attitude.

    No reason to slam the door on your way out though yeah?

    orangina
    Free Member

    I’ve only spot-read this as I haven’t got the time to read it all but still want to add my tuppence.

    I am a female (if you didn’t guess from my username) part-time lurker, some-time poster. I lurk most mornings with my brekkie and lunchtime at work. I post rarely, rarely because I have not got so many profound and interesting things to say as others here and because I’ve got a life and don’t want to spent all my waking hours on a computer.
    I am NOT posting rarely, because I am intimidated in any way. I grew up in a boy’s world (older brother had to look after me a lot and took me out with his mates) and I do like football, F1 (yes I do admit to that), motorbikes and obviously getting dirty (riding my push bike).
    I was never offended by any of the posts I read, as I mainly take it as harmless banter. Judging a woman by her looks ? Yes, it happens and it’s a bit shallow, but I have heard far worse on girls nights out. Us girls – judging a bloke by it’s looks ?? Oh yes. Have you guys never heard us going on about Jonny Depp and the like ?? Do I have to pretend I like him because of his brains ???
    BUT – and this is a firm and big BUT – ‘Kicking in the back door’ – I didn’t know the expression til I came to this thread – is outrageous and wrong on so many levels.
    You CANNOT give rape a pet name, rape is always rape and has to be called that. You cannot use this in any way to describe it, you’re making the act less severe and mock it. If your partner was raped, would you use this expression to describe the crime ?
    Also – ‘must be the time of the month’ – don’t say it guys, it’s boring, mostly not true, shows your shallowness and yes, sexist. So don’t make an arse of yourself.

    Apart from that – I’m fine with most stuff here, have to say though didn’t see the thread in question but a shame Sue feels she has to say good-bye.

    northshoreniall
    Full Member

    Not dismissing the presence of sexism etc, however there is also a lot of people forgetting that words only have the power we ascribe to them. This repeated reference to back doors for example here is first place I have ever heard it refered to as rape, fortunately I read this and have returned to work after my night shift to inform one of our HCA’s that the act she was discussing recently has been declared such by STW and she should in no way be discussing it and even saying she enjoyed it with her partner. Amazingly different people let different words hold power others don’t!
    This is all the rambling of a post night shift brain so may not be as lucid a point as I wish to make but as per guidance above I would have no issue saying it to my mum so think its okay to put online.

    theyEye
    Free Member

    Hm. Is it naive that I had thought the back door thing was about kicking ass?

    Also, as long as we’re so introspective about the forum’s sexism, can we take a little time to consider our ludicrous, and frankly offensive to me, socialism?

    defydude
    Free Member

    Kicking in the back door

    Just to check we are not in a ‘Daily Mail Outrage’ type situation, where has this phrase been used recently, other than being typed out endlessly by those protesting about it?

    MrNutt
    Free Member

    oh another ego thread, ace!

    flange
    Free Member

    Bored now. Every so often we get a ‘look at me I’m going to leave a forum’ topic posted up don’t we?
    The last funny one was FrenchJuan who posted like he drank Jack Daniels using freetranslate

    Racist…

    barnsleymitch
    Free Member

    “The last funny one was FrenchJuan who posted like he drank Jack Daniels using freetranslate”

    I’m only guessing here hora, but I think that would probably be down to the fact that English isnt his first language. Tell you what, you start a post in french, and we’ll see how funny or otherwise that is, hows that?

    ernie_lynch
    Free Member

    Just to check we are not in a ‘Daily Mail Outrage’ type situation, where has this phrase been used recently, other than being typed out endlessly by those protesting about it?

    It’s used on this forum. Are you pretending that it isn’t ?

    Jesus 😐

    defydude
    Free Member

    It’s used on this forum. Are you pretending that it isn’t ?

    No. I asked for examples where it has been used recently as I couldn’t remember any specific incidents. But, don’t let that get in the way of getting outraged.

    StefMcDef
    Free Member

    This time last year, Andy Gray and Richard Keys were getting their jotters from a national broadcaster for indulging in dated locker-room “banter” when they thought no one was listening, despite being sat in front of a bank of cameras and recording equipment. It provoked a debate along the lines of this thread on a national scale.

    I’m with TJ and the handwringing do-gooders on this one. I’m no prude but “banter” which implies, jokes about or normalises violent, unconsensual sex is bad form. So “kicking back doors in”, “would you smash it”, “that winger’s raped the full-back all day long” – I would think less of anyone, mates included, who use this terminology.

    Unless you’re in among likeminded souls in some porn dungeon chatroom that caters for that sort of thing, or amongst mates and out of earshot of anyone you think might be offended. But this is an open forum, read by thousands of people you don’t know, so expect to be called out by someone if anything you’re saying is something you wouldn’t air in polite company.

    If a sweaty-palmed, hairy-knuckled dwarf like Richard Keys is the poster-boy for your conduct towards others, then you’re welcome to it. The irony is that, as with most perpetrators of this type of patter, in real life, you can’t imagine them whispering “hello” under the garden gate, far less getting near anyone’s back door.

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    Really?

    Really. You should have seen him before 😀

    Why would anyone talk about ‘kicking doors in’, if they are being ‘welcomed’ ?

    I think it was usually “bashing” rather than “kicking”, which has a slightly less violent implication. And I never considered it to be “unwelcomed”, simply passionate.

    I basically always read it as “I’d very much like to vigorously engage in rude sexual acts with that attractive young lady” – not exactly charming, but nothing to do with rape.

    However, as I said, other people clearly read it very differently to me, so I will refrain from upsetting them and will attempt to educate others likewise.

    joolsburger
    Free Member

    If this is about that back door phrase it certainly doesn’t mean what some people take it to mean. It’s in the same vein as “roughing up the suspect” and so on, just a bit of a lewd term for a common but not rapey sexual act. The line between banter and offence is often fairly blurred and almost always influenced by the relationship between the people involved. Our office manager (a woman) is frankly outrageous and has been since day one so it’s not like she’s trying to fit in with a lads culture, it’s just how she is. Other women I’ve worked with take a dim view of any sexual banter.

    Bit of common sense is all that’s needed. An internet forum accepts all sorts and I can’t see the point in getting upset about it, this isn’t mumsnet (although if you read some of the stuff over there it makes this place look tame)

    yunki
    Free Member

    smashing

    oldnpastit
    Full Member

    just a bit of a lewd term for a common but not rapey sexual act.

    No.

    I’ve always read it as being a reference to rape. I’m amazed anyone could think otherwise.

    Ignoring it though has clearly been the wrong thing to do. I’m as guilty as anyone on that point.

    Jesus

    That’s a whole new direction to go in….

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    No. I asked for examples where it has been used recently as I couldn’t remember any specific incidents.

    Most have been modded recently. But a trip to the Search box with the phrase “back doors” will still provide you plenty of examples if you are so inclined.

    druidh
    Free Member

    If we’re collecting a list of words and phrases which cause offence and should be avoided, can I add “Jock” and “Sweaty/Sweaty Sock”? I find them as offensive as ****, Chink, and ****.

    ernie_lynch
    Free Member

    I asked for examples where it has been used recently …..

    Why……how is that relevant ?

    If you accept that it is used, as apparently you now do, then specific examples are hardly relevant.

    The only thing I find “outrageous” is the level of denial expressed by some.

    joolsburger
    Free Member

    oldnpastit – You’re wrong then, it’s that simple. It doesn’t mean that and never has.

    KINGTUT
    Free Member

    I’ve always read it as being a reference to rape. I’m amazed anyone could think otherwise.

    I’ve never read it as a reference to rape, I’m amazed that anyone could think otherwise.

    northshoreniall
    Full Member

    Agree there jools as said above here is first place I’ve heard it used or adapted to suit some bodies argument as a forceful non consensual act.

    wwaswas
    Full Member

    a lust of words

    there’s not much on this thread that’s made me smile but that did, but I’m not sure why.

    Dobbo
    Full Member

    We need a PC alternative, how about ‘I’d blow the froth off her cappuccino’ or ‘**** me chavva I’d lick the spit off her Iphone rubberised protective cover’?

    Cougar
    Full Member

    I’ve never read it as a reference to rape, I’m amazed that anyone could think otherwise.

    Same here. I wondered if it was just me, so I googled the phrase in order to try and get an unbiased opinion. First hit was urban dictionary (unsurprisingly, though I was half expecting it to be STW). Seems that the consensus would agree.

    Ergo, as I said a couple of pages back, whilst it’s a crass and intentionally ridiculous phrase, it does not imply rape.

    Glad we cleared that up.

Viewing 40 posts - 441 through 480 (of 586 total)

The topic ‘Sexism on STW (a goodbye and some thanks :) )’ is closed to new replies.