I happened to be out moving some gear in my car today and it needed its bi-monthly fill up (I think I filled it up in July, maybe…). I wasn’t aware of this. They guy at the till said that supply’s basically the same as it has been for the last two months, but the media happen to have found out the supply is low and now he was expecting to run out of fuel by 3pm. Nice early finish for the lad but I don’t think there’s a problem.
I dunno, I can comfortably get 50+ mpg on a run and around 35mpg around town out of mine despite it being 250bhp so whilst it’s not exactly a Nissan Leaf, it’s certainly better than many smaller cars and infinitely better than our 15 year old Mazda 3 that has never, ever got over 40mpg on a run and normally gets around 22mpg around town.
A smaller car with the same engine will always be more efficient, and I can pretty much guarantee you don’t actually need a car that big. We went through all this in the “Why are people buying SUVs when there’s a climate crisis” thread last year. In addition, the bulk of your CO2 cost in any car is when it’s built. In SUVs that’s higher than cars with an equivalent load space because there’s more materials. So while you say your Mazda is worse, it isn’t really. Taking the figures from the Guardian yesterday, 13t of CO2 is used to make and SUV. 5.5t for a hatchback like a Mazda 3. So you’d have to do 55,000 miles in the Mazda just to match the SUV for CO2 footprint. Keeping the old Mazda going is the better thing to do for the environment, even if its CO2 g/km is worse. So, yeah, don’t buy SUVs.