@stevomcd – interested to hear you say that you no longer ‘size down’ with the Alpine 160.
A quick comparison of the Alpine 160’s ‘Archive’ pages on the Orange website shows that the 2011/12/13 16″ Alpine 160’s ETT is 580mm whereas the 2014 19″ is 620mm – that’s quite a jump in size!
Is it the change in angles that’s made the [larger] bike feel more ‘nimble’?
I’ve got a 2009 17″ Blood which is pretty close in geometry to a 2014 17″ Alpine 160 – I’m 6’1″ but with only a 32″ inside leg so was considering trying a 17″ Apline 160 but now you’ve made me re-consider …
– I generally prefer to go smaller on a bike so I can move it around, but would appreciate any thoughts you have based on your experience riding both the [smaller] older & [larger] recent models!
ta! 🙂