When I was a kid, all the books and aviation mags raved about the F16, particularly in a direct dogfight with the Fulcrum. Turns out the F15 and F18 were both better aircraft. But then people used to deride the Tornado, but it was a far, far better all round aircraft than anyone gave it credit for.
Citation needed…
The ground attack versions of the Tornado were, I will admit, very good at what it was originally designed to do, basically dropping bombs on things from low level. When they bolted on a big radar and made it an interceptor, it was a bit rubbish, especially as it would have been up against specialist air attack craft like the Flanker.
All aircraft generally have a niche where they excel. If you build a multi-role vehicle it will, in my opinion, always be compromised in some way. Case in point… Eurofighter2000. Build air superiority fighter based on 80’s/90’s specs, deliver it way past the 2000’s that it was supposed to be awesome in and then, when it is deployed fully, spend a fortune modifying it to drop bombs. Then sell the later ones to Saudi.
Sorry, ranting a bit there. This is not a place to discuss procurement decisions.
F16 is a cracking plane, but it’s not the interceptor that the F15 is or carrier capable like the F18. It’s still bloody good as a fighter though and I would say better than both in a dogfight.