Home Forums Chat Forum My dear old things, it's STW TMS!

Viewing 40 posts - 6,601 through 6,640 (of 7,013 total)
  • My dear old things, it's STW TMS!
  • hazmo
    Full Member

    It’s as brilliant as it is unbearable, but, please can we have Foakes in for the next one?

    Klunk
    Free Member

    37 with 4 wickets :/

    theotherjonv
    Free Member

    It’s alright, I placed a Judas bet at lunchtime to secure it.

    2-1 with two to play.

    Are you not entertained?

    Klunk
    Free Member

    Mad rush from most of the press box to the toilets at drinks.

    Can’t cope.

    even TMS can’t cope

    Klunk
    Free Member

    34 30 required

    Klunk
    Free Member

    24 22 needed come on England!

    dazh
    Full Member

    Shit.

    joelowden
    Full Member

    🫣

    Klunk
    Free Member

    ****!

    theotherjonv
    Free Member

    Takes me back to 2005 but Warne was bowling and no-one had a clue how to play it.

    Klunk
    Free Member

    what a dreadful shot! wtaf with so few needed 🙁

    dazh
    Full Member

    FFS just go for singles.

    theotherjonv
    Free Member

    classic cover drive!

    If Wood finishes this will he get the horse out?

    theotherjonv
    Free Member

    Oh, and behind Smith that’s my second choice for shelling one. Very talented keeper, just don’t like him for some reason.

    dazh
    Full Member

    Are we entertained now?

    Klunk
    Free Member

    have it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    joelowden
    Full Member

    Crackin’ test match

    Klunk
    Free Member

    watching fast bowlers taking a step to leg the just walloping a straight 90 mph ball to the boundary is just joyous 🙂

    pk13
    Full Member

    England clearly have some selection issues now.  jimmy Anderson playing at old Trafford is there room for him it could be his last chance to play at Trafford. and bairstow clearly is 10% off his game.

    Batting line up can stay as is now.

    # edit.  good win tbh and the bowling team definitely deserve it

    Klunk
    Free Member

    can’t drop Woods and Woakes though you can Bairstow, though Id keep Ali if he’s fit to bowl though not batting at 3

    Klunk
    Free Member

    the “1 dayer” approach, ignore convention everyone chips in

    Klunk
    Free Member

    he made (Wood) the aussie top order look asleep 🙂 if England had held their catches this would have been over yesterday

    pk13
    Full Member

    Ali can bat all over and tbf has for most of his career. Wood at the oval will be epic he looks up for it but they cannot rest him with it being 2/1 he is frightening the Aussie tail.

    Tough call on bairstow but he is definitely missing something and not just catching practice.

    Klunk
    Free Member

    tough ?

    bairstow should be toast but it’s england cricket clique, chums a go go

    scuttler
    Full Member

    Thriller (from the Western Terrace 🤪).

    moimoifan
    Free Member

    Chuffed you were there to witness it. I was there on the last day in 2019 and was still shaking my head after the umpteenth pint in the pubs of Headingley.

    Klunk
    Free Member

    so england are sticking with Billy “Bairstow” Bunter behind the stumps.

    fazzini
    Full Member

    so england are sticking with Billy “Bairstow” Bunter behind the stumps.

    It’s like watching me keep wicket, and I’m rubbish* 😳

    (*disclaimer – I was a bowler as a younger person but very broken now, still pining for my wicket-taking days 😂)

    moimoifan
    Free Member

    Billy “Bairstow” Bunter

    Aka ‘Cymbals’.

    Or ‘Iron Mitts’.

    🙄

    moimoifan
    Free Member

    The England women’s team currently making a bollocks of a run chase…

    1
    moimoifan
    Free Member

    But got there in the end. 🙂

    theotherjonv
    Free Member

    Decent start to the Women’s ODI – couple of wickets but Aus going at nearly 6 still.  Although level in the series this is a must win for England; with 2 to play the overall draw means Aus retain.

    Also an interesting read in the Guardian…..takes a while to get to the point but what do we actually want from England?

    https://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/2023/jul/16/ben-stokess-wild-ride-ashes-captaincy-asks-what-do-you-really-want-from-us

    drlex
    Free Member

    Shout out to the cidermen for defending a modest total twice yesterday to lift the T20 blast cup after so many recent unsuccessful Finals days. Somerset, la la la!

    pk13
    Full Member

    T20 final was ok the weather definitely did not help. Deserved the win with some great bowling

    2
    ransos
    Free Member

    Disastrous last over for the women.

    drlex
    Free Member

    Yeah – until then, it felt they’d restricted Aus. to a manageable total; Bell had no answer to Wareham’s use of the crease.

    ransos
    Free Member

    Gah. That last over cost them the game.

    theotherjonv
    Free Member

    Ashes gone, but heck of a game. Easy to say that the 26 last over cost the game but the girls batting with NSB just failed to turn strike over effectively, too many dot balls in the last 5 overs and with just a few more balls – 2 or 3 even – they’d have got in.

    [edit – Glenn 22 off 35 balls. She hit one 4 so if the others came in singles that would be 16 dot balls, more if there were some 2’s or 3’s. You don’t have to be boundary hitters but you have to be able to play tip and run]

    ransos
    Free Member

    Ashes gone, but heck of a game. Easy to say that the 26 last over cost the game but the girls batting with NSB just failed to turn strike over effectively, too many dot balls in the last 5 overs and with just a few more balls – 2 or 3 even – they’d have got in.

    It was a record chase and they got very close, so I think criticism of that is very harsh. Ultimately they were trying to get 15 more runs than they should have.

    theotherjonv
    Free Member

    They were (chasing 15 more) but they’d still have done it. And it’s not ‘blame’, it’s learning what to do better next time.

Viewing 40 posts - 6,601 through 6,640 (of 7,013 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.