My 12 year old son has out grown his 24” cannondale.
We’ve discovered we both like Bike Park Wales blues 🙂
He’s currently 148cm (i’m 173cm & the Mrs is 152cm so he ain’t gonna be huge).
I’m looking at a Whyte 403 (26”/100mm) or a Commencal Meta HT Junior (27.5”120mm).
He’s already at the upper limit of Whytes recommended 125cm-152cm height range.
The Commencal height range is 140cm-160cm, so he’s bang in the middle.
But, looking at the geometry:
WHYTE: Reach = 383mm, ETT = 540mm, Stack = 539mm, Stand Over = 706mm
COMMENCAL: Reach = 366mm, ETT = 545mm, Stack = 584mm, Stand Over = 615mm(?)
So, the smaller Whyte is longer and lower & the Commencal is shorter & higher.
Does this make a mockery of the height guides? And will the Whyte actually “fit” him for more years than the Commencal.
I know the answer is “go and test ride” – but this is a paperwork exercise at present.
Any input appreciated (i’ve no idea how tall the post man was).