Home Forums Chat Forum jacob rees mogg dog

Viewing 40 posts - 121 through 160 (of 349 total)
  • jacob rees mogg dog
  • councilof10
    Free Member

    How come the I’m-more-liberal-than-thou STW bedwetters are so keen to respect the most outlandish beliefs – whether religious or cultural – and yet you refuse to respect the religious beliefs of JRM?

    There are none more bigoted than self-professed liberals.

    zippykona
    Full Member

    Because he is a ****.

    dissonance
    Full Member

    I’m sure Jacob and I would get on like a house on fire. Preferably his.

    Speaking of houses on fire. Wonder how he will get on with the DUP lot?

    kimbers
    Full Member

    councilof10 – Member
    How come the I’m-more-liberal-than-thou STW bedwetters are so keen to respect the most outlandish beliefs – whether religious or cultural – and yet you refuse to respect the religious beliefs of JRM?

    There are none more bigoted than self-professed liberals.

    please show me where us lefties respect these outlandsh beliefs?

    I think its all in your head!

    Tom_W1987
    Free Member

    How come the I’m-more-liberal-than-thou STW bedwetters are so keen to respect the most outlandish beliefs – whether religious or cultural – and yet you refuse to respect the religious beliefs of JRM?

    I’ve been banned more than once for crossing the line in threads on terrorism…

    councilof10
    Free Member

    please show me where us lefties respect these outlandsh beliefs?

    If he was a moderate muslim, who voted in a similar way, maybe even voted against pro-alcohol laws; took a hard line on decency or pornography laws, the sit-down-pissers of STW would feel compelled to demonstrate how “right-on” they are by supporting his right to let his faith dictate his views.

    The reason people are so intolerant of Mogg’s views aren’t because he’s a Catholic, it’s because he’s posh!

    Like I said, bigots. Bitter little bigots.

    outofbreath
    Free Member

    There is a perfectly logical line between infanticide and abortion, does it feel pain?

    At what age can a fetus feel pain?

    But the issue/compromise at the moment is that the latest date for an abortion is around the same time as advances has allowed the baby to become viable.

    Frankly it’s a minefield and I don’t envy anyone who has to make decisions in it.

    Yeah. I was reading awhile back that unborn babies at 23 weeks can survive but always with disability, often severe. Because of this many doctors abroad do not keep 23 week old fetuses alive. In the UK we keep them alive at 23 weeks and some horrifically disabled people are born because of that. Who’s wrong? F**ked if I know. Beats me how anyone can say 24 weeks is the only valid answer and everyone else is wrong.

    Frankly, it seems to be the three most logical points for considering ‘life’ to have begun are birth, conception and perhaps 3 months.

    dannyh
    Free Member

    It’s that same phenomenon that makes kids like panto. An uber-stereo type caricature act that everyone thinks they can easily either boo or cheer, without having to try too hard to think about stuff.

    A sad indictment of where our politics are.

    Tom_W1987
    Free Member

    Nahhh you’re just a butt hurt conservative.

    At what age can a fetus feel pain?

    After the current abortion limit. Its easy to look it up.

    kimbers
    Full Member

    the sit-down-pissers of STW

    Like I said, bigots. Bitter little bigots.

    😯

    I think we need to talk about your chakras

    perhaps some crystal healing will realign your energy flows?

    Tom_W1987
    Free Member

    Frankly, it seems to be the three most logical points for considering ‘life’ to have begun are birth, conception and perhaps 3 months.

    Misses the point, we arent arguing where life began – we are arguing over when we can morally terminate it.

    Moggs interpretation of that is soley based on a book of sky fairies and myth.

    outofbreath
    Free Member

    After the current abortion limit.

    Cite!

    Its easy to look it up.

    Good, you won’t take long to find it, then.

    Frankly, it seems to be the three most logical points for considering ‘life’ to have begun are birth, conception and perhaps 3 months.

    That would make sense to me but I’m glad I’ve never been in a position where I’ve had to make a decision based on this.

    Tom_W1987
    Free Member

    Third trimester or 27 weeks.

    Well after your three month limit.

    outofbreath
    Free Member

    Third trimester or 27 weeks.

    Cite!

    outofbreath
    Free Member

    I’m glad I’ve never been in a position where I’ve had to make a decision based on this.

    Ditto.

    MrWoppit
    Free Member

    Alive but asleep.[/url]

    Tom_W1987
    Free Member

    Hah!

    outofbreath
    Free Member

    You are seriously claiming that article supports a definitive 27 weeks? It’s packed with detail about how hard it is to know!

    However, let’s go with your claim that 27 weeks is the definitive point where fetusses can feel pain and therefore the point where it’s no longer ok to remove them.

    That means you’re agree with Rees Mogg that 24 weeks is not the appropriate point. The only difference is you think it’s wrong one way and he thinks it’s wrong the other way.

    councilof10
    Free Member

    This ones for councilof10,
    quick look & the first 4 muslim MPs came to mind voting records….

    I think you need to go back and reread what I posted…

    Tom_W1987
    Free Member

    I think its probably best to be cautious….hence 24 werks.

    …. its packed with detail you don’t understand…. so you think the evidrnce doesnt support 27 weeks because you dont understand all the available evidence… but fMRI doesnt lie….

    outofbreath
    Free Member

    I think its probably brst to be cautious….

    I’d have thought you’d argue the cautious approach would be not to force women who are victims of rape to “carry and raise the child”.

    Instead you’re arguing that caution lies with favoring the child’s ‘right’ to life over the mothers right not to have an unwanted child. Are you Rees-Mogg in disguise?

    Northwind
    Full Member

    zippykona – Member

    Farron had to resign for being a Christian

    No he didn’t, he resigned after completely mishandling the issue, and refusing on several occasions to clarify his own position where his personal opinion runs counter to party policy, it was as much about credibility and competence as it was about faith.

    outofbreath
    Free Member

    Farron had to resign for being a Christian

    No he didn’t,

    Yes he did, he stated exactly why he resigned:

    Even so, I seem to be the subject of suspicion because of what I believe and who my faith is in.

    That’s why I have chosen to step down as leader of the Liberal Democrats.”

    Tom_W1987
    Free Member

    ‘d have thought you’d argue the cautious approach would be not to force women who are victims of rape to “carry and raise the child”.

    Instead you’re arguing that caution lies with favoring the child’s ‘right’ to life over the mothers right not to have an unwanted child. Are you Rees-Mogg in disguise

    I’d argue that as well, but Mogg doesnt care about women having to bring up children born out of rape. So I’m not arguing from that angle.

    Tom_W1987
    Free Member

    Yes he did, he stated exactly why he resigned:

    Good.

    Marx and the French had the right idea.

    outofbreath
    Free Member

    I’d have thought you’d argue the cautious approach would be not to force women who are victims of rape to “carry and raise the child”.

    Instead you’re arguing that caution lies with favoring the child’s ‘right’ to life over the mothers right not to have an unwanted child. Are you Rees-Mogg in disguise?

    I’d argue that as well,

    Yes, you probably would. 😀

    outofbreath
    Free Member

    Good.

    I made no comment on whether it was good or bad. Merely that that was the reason.

    dissonance
    Full Member

    the sit-down-pissers of STW would feel compelled to demonstrate how “right-on” they are by supporting his right to let his faith dictate his views.

    Dont suppose you have any evidence for that? Also I wouldnt exactly call someone pushing those positions a moderate. Unless the alcohol laws was requiring everyone to drink.

    Tom_W1987
    Free Member

    apologies for my atrocious typing btw… I still dont get on with touchscreen phones. 😀

    joefm
    Full Member

    He shouldn’t have a view on it. Nothing to do with him. The guys a ****

    Tom_W1987
    Free Member

    I’d love to take him to the Philippines, my wifes country – to show him what his beloved religion has done to the country and what it’s family planning laws or lack of have done.

    lunge
    Full Member

    Someone posted this pic on Twitter, seems strangely appropriate for this discussion.

    thisisnotaspoon
    Free Member

    joefm – Member
    He shouldn’t have a view on it. Nothing to do with him. The guys a ****

    He’s a politician, it’s his job to have a view on things.

    Tom_W1987
    Free Member

    anyhow – I’m going to chill out now…. my wife/university sweethearts Visa renewal went through… i should be celebrating. Have a fun argument guys, Im flouncing for a bit.

    ctk
    Full Member

    His position is ridiculous! “I believe/do whatever the Pope says!” FFS

    ninfan
    Free Member

    His position is ridiculous! “I believe/do whatever the Pope says!” FFS

    Interesting, so you presumably support the repeal of the Roman Catholic Relief Act of 1829?

    Junkyard
    Free Member

    That is definitely the point they were making well spotted.

Viewing 40 posts - 121 through 160 (of 349 total)

The topic ‘jacob rees mogg dog’ is closed to new replies.