Home Forums Bike Forum Does anyone know Luminous lights ?

Viewing 40 posts - 81 through 120 (of 144 total)
  • Does anyone know Luminous lights ?
  • Bez
    Full Member

    No need to remove it, just take a black marker to the “Not e h”.

    tinybits
    Free Member

    This is great. Customer is rubbish for breaking a seal. But I won’t tell you what it is, oh no, you’re just wrong because your thick.

    xcgb
    Free Member

    DezB
    Free Member

    but as I do not bank online

    No-one else picked up on this? Just weird!

    Anyway, this shouldn’t really be a discussion on the forum.. Should it?.

    Toasty
    Full Member

    So, since he’s gone now. Isn’t the 401 just a Magicshine MJ-872 for double the cost, with a pretty blue body and a battery with black tape on? Not sure I get it. All the specs are identical, and you don’t get the posh body like Exposure do.

    Stick my battery around the back of the seatpost and wind the cable around the top tube personally 🙂 In line with spray from the back wheel, but what the hell, it’s got tape on it.

    doof_doof
    Free Member

    Mounting a battery (waterproof or not) on a downtube is the most idiotic thing I’ve heard in a long time. Or at least today.

    bedmaker
    Full Member

    Mounting a battery (waterproof or not) on a downtube is the most idiotic thing I’ve heard in a long time.

    Not if you have a trailquest map on the top tube. 🙂

    tinybits
    Free Member

    toasty +1 on the specs…. It is the same isn’t it? And blue clashes with my bike !.

    Gary_M
    Free Member

    Instead of taking my advice, the battery was placed in a location on the bike that I’ve never seen a light battery placed, before. On the down tube , directly behind the front wheel

    So is the battery waterproof or water resistant then? If it is waterproof why would it matter if mounted directly in line with wheel spray? I wouldn’t mount a light battery there but my battery doesn’t claim to be waterproof.

    Di2 batteries are downtube mounted in many cases, the seem to work okay.

    STATO
    Free Member

    Didnt loads of people run batteries under the downtube back when we ran halogens. They were all big bottle type batteries and the downtube bottle cage was the only space on many full-sus designs.

    I used to run my lumicycle battery (in bag) under the downtube as i kept hitting it with my knees under the tt. For reference, they were water proofed by a big blob of hot glue at the connector end of the battery and some shrink wrap. If thats how Luminous does his then i suppose wriggling the wire could have broken the seal, dont see how thats ‘tampering’ tho, just use.

    julianwilson
    Free Member

    Instead of taking my advice, the battery was placed in a location on the bike that I’ve never seen a light battery placed, before. On the down tube , directly behind the front wheel

    Mounting a battery (and lamp!) inside a fishtank also seems like a bad idea but it didn’t stop it working or someone putting a youtube video on their website to show this was possible. 😉

    njee20
    Free Member

    Well I don’t think either party has come out of this well, but I’m backing MTG, as Luminous seems to rant and ignore facts, rather than admit there was a possible problem. I’d say he’s done his own reputation far more damage than Graham did!

    leffeboy
    Full Member

    both down :(. Hunts out ‘Eye of the Tiger’ CD to see if that helps

    Mrs MTG feels guilty about starting an argument on here now. She doesn’t use the internet much and doesn’t realise they happen all the time. She still thinks I’m famous because I’m on Youtube.
    She’s checking dates of emails and cheques to back up her feelings of dissatisfaction with Luminous. I don’t know whether to post them here as justification for starting this thread, or leave it to avoid dragging this on any longer.
    There was an undelivered parcel note in her letterbox after all. After not getting replies to previous emails, she had given up checking the letterbox every day and it sat amongst the junk mail all weekend.
    If Luminous had emeiled her on the 13th with the tracking number, or just to say it was in the post, none of this would have happened.

    The overall issue will never be resolved.
    I can’t prove I didn’t remove any waterproofing, Luminous can’t prove I did.
    All we’ve got is the balance of probabilities.
    Which is more likely, that I spent £300 on a light, then deliberately removed the waterproofing, or that Luminous didn’t waterproof it properly in the first place ?
    As he seems more intent on mocking my lack of knowledge about waterproofing techniques than explaining what he does to the batteries, we’ll never know.

    Same with the charger. It just sat on a table at my house, then on a different table at Mrs MTG’s house. It can’t be proven either way how any damage occurred.

    A Google images search for Downtube Battery Mounting shows I’m not the first person to try it. My cheap rear light catches the spray off the rear tyre and is still working.

    The fish tank video. It would be interesting to see if any owners of Luminous lights would take the risk of replicating this test with their own light.

    Running a business with no internet banking. Yes, I thought that was odd too.

    xcgb
    Free Member

    I think this thread needs a Poll……

    rob-jackson
    Free Member

    Mackem
    Full Member

    Sorry, but you are waiting for a parcel. You have an undelivered parcel note. You couldnt connect the two together?

    xcgb
    Free Member

    Rob I bet myself someone would post a pic of him

    I win a muffin!. There goes the diet

    stevied
    Free Member

    There was an undelivered parcel note in her letterbox after all

    Hmmm..

    khani
    Free Member

    There was an undelivered parcel note in her letterbox after all

    😀

    Oh dear, Mrs MTG is angry now that she thinks she is getting the blame.

    I’ll get all the dates off her when we’ve got more time, but she posted the cheque to Luminous on 21st January and the money went out of her account on 6th February.
    Not surprisingly, by 15th March and no email about delivery from Luminous, she had more or less given up hope and we thought posting on here might be more productive than another unanswered email.

    What we think might have happened on Friday 15th is that she checked the post in the morning, then a different parcel van dropped the undelivered item note in the box later in the day.

    Five weeks after cashing the cheque, an email with the tracking code from Luminous would have saved all this trouble.

    nealglover
    Free Member

    Seems odd.

    stilltortoise
    Free Member

    Did you try picking up the phone? I know far too many people – myself included – who forget that telephones are more often than not the most effective way of communicating. As a young(er) Mr Hoskins once said, “It’s good to talk.”

    DaveyBoyWonder
    Free Member

    Superstar, Sierra Cycling and now Luminous. Who will take up the challenge of trail-by-STW next and will they come out victorious?

    FWIW, I back Luminous, simply because MTG has the word ‘midland’ and ‘trailquest’ in his name, neither things I’m a fan of. You may have well called yourself SouthernSpeedWalkingGraham.

    You’re lucky my father in law and a mate are called Graham otherwise I’d be suggesting the death penalty.

    Gary_M
    Free Member

    How would the op call luminous, he doesn’t have a number on his website, only an email address. So email would appear to be the preferred option for contacting him. So in this case the telephone probably isn’t a very effective way of communicating.

    And his first post on this whole nasty affair Contact me through the usual channels and have a word with the mods to have this thread AND my name removed from here !. doesn’t present the guy in a very good light. I don’t think poor service should be swept under the carpet.

    bullandbladder
    Free Member

    ^^ 😆 ^^

    xcgb
    Free Member

    FWIW, I back Luminous, simply because MTG has the word ‘midland’ and ‘trailquest’ in his name

    Ever done Jury service? 🙂

    stilltortoise
    Free Member

    I’m all for entrepreneurs trying to make a few bob, but this…

    he doesn’t have a number on his website

    …and this (from WHOIS results for Luminouslights.co.uk)…

    The registrant is a non-trading individual who has opted to have their address omitted from the WHOIS service.

    …would make me very nervous about buying from them. FWIW I’ve had similar experiences to Graham and although I didn’t need to go the route of trial-by-Singletrackworld, it did leave a bitter taste. I see the same lights coming onto the market every year, but under a different brand. The businesses that look after their customers will survive.

    Luminous
    Free Member

    I’ll get all the dates off her when we’ve got more time
    To achieve what ? If you still have an issue with me, you could’ve just e-mailed me today but instead you’re trolling your own thread.

    You’re bored, building your shed, so you’ll pick on someone.
    Building work is progressing.
    Nailing on boards today, in between coming inside to stand by the fire and post nonsense on the internet.

    MidlandTrailquestsGraham – Member
    That’s the trouble with being a nichetarian.
    If I had a similar problem with a Fox fork, I’d get hundreds of replies, or more likely, I’d be told that the same question had already been asked hundreds of times.

    I believe I am the only person in the world to snap a Ward Industries titanium pedal spindle, drown a Luminous light battery, snap two Gates CentreTrack belts and wreck a Time Atac XS pedal bearing in three days.
    I can now add seizing a Lefty steerer and stem together to my CV

    Time perhaps for some happier people to contribute:
    Time for a bit of feedback perhaps.

    Dan.
    “Light was superb
    People were moving out of the way saying come through on my right when I was 60m away from them. They thought I was right behind them. Well funny”
    MM 2010
    .
    Dave.
    “feedback is fantastic, riding mates were envious, and I was amazed at the advances since my old niterider”
    2010
    .
    Nicko.
    “Went out Friday Wednesday night with the light – it is fantastic – thank you very much”
    2010
    .
    Matthew.
    “Just wanted to let you know how good mine still is – totally reliable and going strong.””
    “Plenty seem to have good words to say about your kit (including me) “
    “I can’t fault mine and would recommend the light to anyone.”
    2010.
    .
    What Mountain Bike.
    “We’ve thoroughly tested the 401 Pro in a wide variety of conditions and pushed the burn times (and waterproofing!) to the limits during solo 24hr events and been impressed with the performance.”

    Take the time to read the WMB review and you’ll note that they left the battery, connected to the light, outside, for a week !

    The haters here are always going to hate, that’s their issue.
    Also, the charger sold to the OP cost him £30. It cost me more than that, and this is what I get for my efforts.
    Connector:
    http://uk.farnell.com/fischer-connectors/deu-102-a052-130/receptacle-ip68-panel-3way/dp/1866142
    4S Li-Ion charger:
    http://www.mtbbatteries.co.uk/mountain-bike-batteries/chargers/
    Plus labour, plus postage, plus materials.
    Thanks.

    Tom-B
    Free Member

    Luminous is questioning MTQG’s proof that he didn’t remove the waterproofing…..where is the proof that he dispatched the light/battery waterproofed?. I’m not suggesting that he purposely sent it out like that but surely he could have made a mistake?.

    Anyway, I’ll add him to my list of people to never deal with!.

    steve_b77
    Free Member

    If the battery is actually water or even weather proof and confirms with European regulations / standards as I imagine a product being sold for a not small price would do. Should it not have the corresponding IP rating quoted on it and within the accompanying literature? .

    On another note, I didn’t know anyone under 60 actually used cheques anymore!?!?!?!?

    xcgb
    Free Member

    And hes back in the room !.

    xcgb
    Free Member

    Anyway, I’ll add him to my list of people to never deal with!.

    Oooh I like a list – do share!.

    Tom-B
    Free Member

    Ooh he posted whilst I was typing and still hasn’t sorted his grammar!. 😆

    xcgb
    Free Member

    I think its a trademark stylee kinda thing now !.

    Northwind
    Full Member

    Luminous- the key point is the waterproofing, if you can clear that up then the thread will be yours on a knockout, at the moment it’s going to points and who can ever guess the result when that happens?

    Or, square go behind the bike sheds after school.

    Tom-B
    Free Member

    😯 just read the response from luminous!. Oh my!.

    jesterthefirst
    Free Member

    This is a great spitting match. FWIW this is my one penny contribution. I have always believed that if any item is sold to a customer then the warranty belongs to that customer. If it then becomes second hand by what ever means, then it nullifies the warranty. Of course, I could be wrong.

    My second pennies worth is that I know both the OP and his OH and they are both very honest people and would never complain about something unless there was justification.

    I’ve lost count of how many rounds there have been so can someone advise me what round we are on so I can hold up a placard and ring the bell?

    DaveyBoyWonder
    Free Member

    Ever done Jury service?

    Funnily enough, no. But I reckon it’d be a scream. They say first impressions count. If you’re wearing a track suit and trainers, you’re guilty. Chavs only wear trainers and track suits so they can run away from the police etc, otherwise they’d dress like law abiding citizens.

    Cheezpleez
    Full Member

    This thread would make a great discussion piece for PHSE lessons 😆

Viewing 40 posts - 81 through 120 (of 144 total)

The topic ‘Does anyone know Luminous lights ?’ is closed to new replies.