they are the baby boomers who’ve eaten the cake already!
I dunno – first it’s “Generation Y’s” fault – then it’s the “Baby Boomers”.
Is there a generation that is not culpable?
I’m not sure what cake you think the consultants have eaten, but I know a few and in my experience they work incredibly hard for their money.
The mythical days of one operation then a round of golf are long long gone, if they ever really existed at all.
I’m not convinced any of your assertions are demonstrably true.
Well it looks like 99% of the doctors who are on the sharp end of this disagree with you.
I’ve seen people go through the figures on their own pay slips and calculate how much of a pay cut they face.
If the BMA website hadn’t crashed today under load then I’d point you at the contract so you could read it yourself.
I might be old fashioned but when your vocation (not ‘job’) involves saving lives, strike action is inappropriate at any time.
What if they strike to save lives?
If the new contract puts patients at risk, which they believe it will, and this is the only way they can challenge it effectively then strike action is entirely appropriate.
Do you think any doctor took this decision lightly?
My wife has agonised over it for a fortnight.
Striking is the very last thing they want to do.
To quote my wife on FB this morning: “It’s a sad day that it’s come to this. No one wants this.”
Maybe we will see doctors coming into work anyway if they learn that effective cover cannot be provided in their absence – do you think they will?
Some might. But the consultants, SAS doctors etc are right behind them and will provide appropriate emergency cover.
Seems pretty clear cut in the context of the Hippocratic oath…
Not if you consider that greater harm may be caused to your patients by not striking.