the newt reference is a complete lie, and indeed dog whistling of the highest order. the regs have been pretty much as they currently are since the early 80s. the failures in the provision of infrastructure of all types lies squarely with the management by governments past and present, it has nothing to do with newts, or any other ecological receptor. it also has absolutely nothing to do with the planning system, despite what cummings has been bleating on about. the planning system definitely isn’t perfect, but it isn’t the problem here.
more importantly, this is already being framed as a choice between development and sustainability. the idea that this is a choice is also a lie. we need both, and it can be done, but big changes are needed. in my view, the conservative party (and more than likely some politicians in other parties) will do everything within their power to prevent these changes from happening, as such changes will require future decisions to be made for the greater good, rather than the enrichment of themselves, and those who bankroll them.