Home › Forums › Chat Forum › Attention Motorcyclists…
- This topic has 371 replies, 66 voices, and was last updated 12 years ago by PeterPoddy.
-
Attention Motorcyclists…
-
brukFull Member
Sorry, yes 4 and 2 although most of the braking is done with the front wheel(s).
Still reinforces how with modern abs and big fat tyres most cars can brake quicker and more safely on our dodgy roads.
HohumFree MemberCougar – Member
I have a theory that many BMW drivers drive the way they do because of exactly this attitude; it leaves them no other choice. I had a Merc for a while, and found that the only way to make progress was to drive to the stereotype because no-one ever gives you a break or lets you out, ever. Indicating just tips people off so they can get the drop on you and block you in.
I drive a BMW and find that most drivers are okay to me (apart from Subura drivers for some reason :?)
However, I think the main reason why is because my BMW is an old 51 plate.
althepalFull MemberAhhhh, reminds me of the old filtering thread…
Happy days, happy days indeed!TurnerGuyFree Memberdiesel alfa right?
not a real alfa
not a real alfa drivernope – my 3rd petrol alfa – went for petrol over diesel as, although the low rev torque isn’t as good, engine braking is better!
(I’m actually assuming you’re joking here)
of course I am joking about BMWs, it is Audis that really boil my p1ss…
PeterPoddyFree MemberI take it that you don’t actually drive a car much nowadays.
Currently doing 700+ miles in a 5 day working week for work.
Hampshire to Cumbria this week, for example. Currently in Carlisle.Generally I’m a very relaxed driver. I don’t rush.
weeksyFull MemberStill reinforces how with modern abs and big fat tyres most cars can brake quicker and more safely on our dodgy roads
You know lots of bikes come with ABS now too ?
nickfFree MemberYou know lots of bikes come with ABS now too ?
This is STW, why let the facts get in the way?
CougarFull MemberIf you just dropped back a bit, there’d be more room for facts.
klumpyFree MemberRule 163 states:
move quickly past the vehicle you are overtaking, once you have started to overtake. Allow plenty of room. Move back to the left as soon as you can but do not cut in”
“Plenty of room” is undefined, but no mention is made of two second gaps or stopping distances.
Rule 168 states:
Being overtaken. If a driver is trying to overtake you, maintain a steady course and speed, slowing down if necessary to let the vehicle pass. Never obstruct drivers who wish to pass. Speeding up or driving unpredictably while someone is overtaking you is dangerous. Drop back to maintain a two-second gap if someone overtakes and pulls into the gap in front of you.
Therefore, re-spacing the deck once an overtaking vehicle has pulled in is expected and required.
Sorry to spoil the fun.
29ers suck.
brukFull MemberSorry didn’t know most bikes have abs now too. Still dont think they can out brake a car though. You could argue reaction times might be better as riders can see further up road ( as long as no vans etc blocking line of sight etc) but still think that the risk of crashing due to heavy braking on a bike is higher than in a car abs or not.
Have vague memories of seeing abs hydraulic rim brakes on a mountain bike many years ago but dont think they caught on
weeksyFull Membermost
is stretching it a bit Bruk, it’s still the minority.
I’ve only crashed twice under hard braking.
Once was my first race, another was trying to outbrake a British Superstock racing mate. 🙂
PeterPoddyFree MemberStill reinforces how with modern abs and big fat tyres most cars can brake quicker and more safely on our dodgy roads
To be fair I would never doubt a car will outbrake a bike myself. Cars have everything going for them, electronics, grip, not being able to fall off, and very importantly, they don’t lift the back end off the floor if you overdo the brakes in a straight line.
fourbangerFree MemberDrop back to maintain a two-second gap if someone overtakes and pulls into the gap in front of you.
So does this settle it then?
TurnerGuyFree MemberSo does this settle it then?
combined with
but do not cut in
then yes – not cutting in would preclude dangerously reducing my braking distance.
or cut in and risk that if you caused an accident then those Z2 Bombers would be coming out of my car boot…
richmtbFull MemberSo are we saying everyone should wait for a four second gap to slot into before overtaking?
WoodyFree MemberI don’t think TurnerGuy is saying that now – he’s gone from this
If I have a 2 second gap in front of me then I might accept a bike/car overtaking and leaving me 1.5 seconds whilst I ease off the accelerator to adjust the gap, but any less than that is unacceptable.
To this
then yes – not cutting in would preclude dangerously reducing my braking distance.
For sake of argument, at 50mph, a 2 second gap is approx. 50 yards, so even at half that distance, you still have 25 yards from the bike. Given that an ‘average’ car length is 15 feet (or 3 yards) long, that still gives you over 8 car lengths of a gap that is presumably still increasing by virtue of a combination of their additional speed and your deceleration!
Can we take it that you have come to the conclusion that as long as someone does not ‘cut immediately in front’ (which no-one condoned BTW and is very different to filtering as advocated by PP) that your earlier posts were not entirely correct and we have reached an agreement? 😀
TurnerGuyFree MemberSo are we saying everyone should wait for a four second gap to slot into before overtaking?
no but they shouldn’t reduce my braking distance to something that is dangerous for me, so maybe a second at the very minimum.
There will be a limit to how quickly I can gain my 2 seconds distance back by just easing off the accelerator, so if someone takes too much of my braking distance away then I am going to have to brake, which is something the overtaker should not force me to do.
CougarFull MemberBut you’ll have seen him coming and already started to increase your braking distance in anticipation, of course.
WoodyFree MemberThere will be a limit to how quickly I can gain my 2 seconds distance back
But in the ‘real world’ with your all-round observation skills, you will be able to see much further ahead than just the bike and car in front, so will still be able to maintain a safe margin.
You seem quite obsessed with this 2 second ‘rule’. Do you ever overtake anything on the open road? I’m wondering how you manage to count 2 seconds to the car about to be overtaken (reducing to zero at some point in the manoeuvre and presumably inducing considerable moistness in your undercrackers) while also trying to ascertain whether there is over 3-4 seconds between the car the car you are overtaking and the one you will slot in behind!
I’m getting a headache just thinking about it 8)
TurnerGuyFree Memberyou will be able to see much further ahead than just the bike and car in front
except when they go over the brow of a hill, or round a bend, or the car in front is a van or something that I can’t see through.
PeterPoddyFree MemberWhat tyres for overtaking cars on a motorbike?
I’ve fount that any round, rubbery ones will do the job time after time after time after time after time after time after time after time after time after time after time after time after time after time after time after time after time after time after time after time.
And that’s just filtering through one small queue.
😀
PeterPoddyFree Memberthen yes – not cutting in would preclude dangerously reducing my braking distance.
Actually, I’d forgotten one tinsy-winsy detail:
At our nominal 50mph/50yd gap I’ll pull right to the front of that gap, near the car in front of you, reducing your space by 5 yards, maybe a tad more.
i.e. Bugger all difference to youWhere does that leave the “FORCING us to BRAKE” advocates now, hmmm?
Now that’s checkmate again. I win 2 games to nil.
Note:
Remember, I’m making my decisions, I don’t need you to make them for me…..mattsccmFree MemberCrikey there are some grumpy jerks here! and some inconsiderate ones. Speaking from the point of view of a mororcyclist for 33 years, a car driver for 32 and a cyclist for 40 I reckon I have seen a lot.
tyhe m/c who slots into a space allocated by a driver as his stopping space is a t***. Some dimwit above reckons that as the car can see past the m/c the stopping space is still there. not when the deer that started the thread walks out , or you stall it, or you go onto reserve etc. All seen this summer. then the m/c or what ever stops dead. By doung such a thing you are dead selfish and just plain thick. ah well evolution may get you, sooner rather than later.
I do filter on my m/c, part of the reason for having it but I do not screw up other drivers. I do take great pleasure in ensuring that no one does it to me though by being deadly boring and playing by the book.
As usual the selfish sods come out to play.
It’s easy, if you play by the rules, not the ones you want then you are correct. If not, rude word deleted as its a family forum
anyway, that deers, was it near Staunton? there is a lovely guts stain all over the road with signs of it being spread for yards.
Better to hit a deer than a boar though. the latter don’t givePeterPoddyFree MemberIt’s easy, if you play by the rules
I do. All the printed ones quoted above and the other, unprinted ones. 🙂
Well. Maybe I go over the speed limit a tinsy winsy little bit now and again. Hey Ho! 😉
Crikey there are some grumpy jerks here!
And here comes another. 😛
tyhe m/c who slots into a space allocated by a driver as his stopping space is a t***.
But perfectly within his rights, it seems. 🙂
WoodyFree MemberSome dimwit above reckons that as the car can see past the m/c the stopping space is still there.
Who said that?
As for being hit by a deer, shit happens (you could also be hit by a light aircraft) but going onto reserve or stalling and stopping dead? Have you not got a clutch??
TurnerGuyFree MemberI’ll pull right to the front of that gap, near the car in front of you
perfect, just what is wanted – I will be only to happy to pull back, maybe even brake, in order for to adopt a safer position on the road, if I haven’t already started doing so.
Who said that?
you – read your own post above.
PeterPoddyFree MemberWho said that?
you – read your own post above.I thought it was me to be honest.
WoodyFree MemberDo you mean this
But in the ‘real world’ with your all-round observation skills, you will be able to see much further ahead than just the bike and car in front, so will still be able to maintain a safe margin.
Interesting that you should take that so literally. By your logic, no-one should overtake and pull in until they are at least two seconds ahead of you. Surely staying on the other side of the road for that long presents a much more dangerous scenario than pulling in safely at the earliest opportunity without cutting across, as advocated in the Highway Code.
You might like to have a look at the video linked below and if you are really feeling anal, time the gaps between cars.
It would, of course be much quicker and safer on a bike 😉
TurnerGuyFree MemberYou might like to have a look at the video linked below
yeah, and when he pulled into the gap, he pulled in close to the car in front, thereby compromising the braking distance of the car behind as little as possible and taking more of the risk than he was imposing on the car behind.
Just like PP said above, and also when I overtake.
And if the car behind had been driving with a 2 second gap it would have been even safer.
martinxyzFree MemberI’d like to post this wee story as a reminder for car drivers/motor cyclists.
I wonder if the accused looked in her mirror but had one last glance up ahead before pulling out a split second after the biker decided to go for it? I just keep picturing the biker going for a really quick pass and the woman deciding to make the move roughly the same moment.. with it all ending with a death. Without seeing what happened its hard to put the blame on any of them but if any of you are out on the bike and see an overtaking moment ahead and decide to spurt past (and quite rightly too) just be aware of what some drivers can do up ahead and always remember that many drivers won’t realize just how fast you can put a thought into practice. Remember,no matter how much power we have with bikes to ‘quickly and safely’ get past,there’s other road users out there not expecting what bikes are capable of. So when things don’t go to plan,there’s not always going to be a time for arguing with the driver or motorcyclist over who was at fault as in this case,the motorcyclist was knocked/pinned/T-boned into the rockface by the sounds of things. Game over.
http://www.highland-news.co.uk/News/Three-year-ban-for-woman-who-caused-A82-death-crash-15052012.htm
From a drivers point of view, If you see headlights of a bike in the mirror, EXPECT it to be passing you within fractions of a second.
After reading this story I now think twice about passing as fast as I used to on the motorbike. In the right gear you could easily pass a line of cars without booting it. Booting it might get you past quickly (and supposedly safely in a motorcyclists mindset) but have a read of this story to view overtaking from a different perspective.
martinxyzFree MemberWoody, the clip shows a confident driver making progress but at the same time it makes me wonder what would have happened if the car he pulled in behind freaked a bit and lifted off.
On the type of road and how busy it is,this can often be a complete waste of time.
Not to mention Coffeeking wearing his brakes out far earlier than expected ;O)
juanFree MemberWhat tyres for overtaking cars on a motorbike?
BT16 obviously…
I can’t believe that stuff is till going
WoodyFree MemberSad story Martin but it doesn’t surprise me. I fully expect every car I overtake to pull out as it happens so regularly (at least 5 or 6 times on a shift at work) as people simply do not check their mirrors or expect another vehicle to be overtaking at speed.
EDIT: Martin TBH the driving in the video didn’t impress me either as it highlighted how pointless an overtake in that situation was in a car. Personally, I would assume there was a nutter desperate to overtake if I saw someone weaving around like that and he may well have caused anxiety in the other road users. It did illustrate a ‘normal’ driving scenario however and showed that people generally drive far too close to the car in front, thus making overtaking even more hazardous.
nick1962Free MemberEvery biker who has overtaken me in the Highlands has been breaking the speed limit. Most have also overtaken several cars at once,several appear to have overtaken blind judging by the way they have had to cut back in into gaps that aren’t really there and braked.I would estimate that several were in excess of 90mph and certainly some well over 100mph.They are endagering themselves and other road users. There are certainly bad car drivers too and although quite a few have overtaken me breaking the speed limit and a couple have overtaken more than one car at once but none have ever displayed the wrecklessness I see from practically every biker I have encountered.
TandemJeremyFree Membernick1962 – Member
Every biker who has overtaken me in the Highlands has been breaking the speed limit. Most have also overtaken several cars at once,several appear to have overtaken blind judging by the way they have had to cut back in into gaps that aren’t really there and braked.
Hang on a mo – we get slagged for overtaking more than one car at once and for cutting in between cars…………. I guess we arenotallowed to overtake any more at all?
.
I would estimate that several were in excess of 90mph and certainly some well over 100mph.
slow riders then? 🙄
If overtaking it is best to get the manoeuvre over and done with as quick as possible. give any bike a handful in the middle gears and its gone from 50 – 90 in a few yards thus the overtake is done safely and well.
TurnerGuyFree MemberTBH the driving in the video didn’t impress me either as it highlighted how pointless an overtake in that situation was in a car
I was going to say this but thought better of it – more ammo for someone to bash me with…
I think one of the best features of satnavs is in showing an ETA, then you can see how pointless it is to drive around aggressively, better to save it and just wait for some decent corners to carve round.
nick1962Free MemberTJ
I’m driving at the speed limit so no you aren’t legally allowed to overtake.
And I should have added that all the bikers who have overtaken me have then shot off into the distance too well in excess of the speed limit.It seems to me they have overtaken just to get some open road to floor it.
How sensible.
Edit: And I forgot to mention those block white lines indicating no overtaking don’t seem apply to motorcylistsmoe_szyslakFree MemberSorry didn’t know most bikes have abs now too. Still dont think they can out brake a car though
The braking performance a bike has would blow your mind. To put it into perspectivemost bikes have font brake discs (ignore rear for car and bike, they don’t provide signitifcant additional braking power), these discs are larger than the ones on your car (unless you have an M3>).
Furthermore these two gigantic discs (and it has to be said excellent minimum 4 pot calipers) have to slow down (even with rider) sub 400kgs, in the real world probably a lot less. Super bikes routinely weigh in at 250kgs. All you have to add-in then is the weight of a wreckless working class rider with a death wish and you can see that the weight versus braking power is immense. Furthermore they don’t stand up on end like your Cotic hardtail, they have real grip. Very few things can out-brake a bike.
The topic ‘Attention Motorcyclists…’ is closed to new replies.