Home › Forums › Chat Forum › arrogant posh boys
- This topic has 134 replies, 45 voices, and was last updated 12 years ago by yunki.
-
arrogant posh boys
-
anagallis_arvensisFull Member
If democracy was truly representative then we would be in a much worse state than we are, what we need is more pressure to amke govt more transparent, but hopefully keep the elite (ie the cleverest and most ballsy) in power as we don’t want thick layabouts making improtant decisions for us. (not the the working classes are, my definition of elite is: clever and ballsy , and is utterly unrelated to received wealth/title)
you make a lot of assumption here I do not agree with. Since less and less working class people have been in parliament and more and more career politicians have been around the social mobility of the country has reduced.
anagallis_arvensisFull Membernot not more or at least up ere we arent
i am lower class
self employed 😉
t’s disheartening to see some posters think working class = thick, lazy and fat.
but not suprising
wreckerFree MemberI think if you go to uni regardless of what your parents do you are middle class.
Nope. A chav will always be a chav.
There’s plenty of unemployed grads and plenty more in unskilled labour. Not middle class. There’s non grads in management positions (often senior to grads) with high incomes, property owners and definately NIMBYs. Definitely middle class.LawmanmxFree Memberpolitics is rigged and always has been, they ALL piss in the same pot!
well, the ones that get anywhere do.binnersFull MemberIt’s disheartening to see some posters think working class = thick, lazy and fat.
Its disheartening, but hardly surprising. Its been open season in the (Tory) press to demonise the working class for ages now. As it suits their agenda. The dismantling of the welfare state/health service/education system, and the further redistribution of wealth to those at the top
anagallis_arvensisFull MemberI’m a chav than wrecker, better than a **** I suppose
wreckerFree MemberIf you were a chav before you went to uni; you’re still one now.
I’m not sure what a **** is so I’ll take your word for it.anagallis_arvensisFull MemberI’m not sure what a **** is so I’ll take your word for it.
Thats hardly suprising
grumFree MemberNope. A chav will always be a chav.
And they say we have a problem with lack of social mobility in this country. No point people trying to better themselves, they’ll always be scum eh.
wreckerFree MemberThats hardly suprising
Aw bless. The chavvy grad has spat the dummy.
Oh, and I’ve not said a chav is scum.TandemJeremyFree MemberI was thinking a bit about this last night – it has been mentioned on here before.
Why are our currant crop of politicians of all parties so unbelievably bland and dull – and such political nonentities?
anagallis_arvensisFull Memberwrecker it may have escaped your tiny mind but we are trying to have a discussion here, not some stupid game of insult slinging. Nice edit on your original post by the way.
Why are our currant crop of politicians of all parties so unbelievably bland and dull – and such political nonentities?
career politicians IMO
wreckerFree Memberwrecker it may have escaped your tiny mind but we are trying to have a discussion here, not some stupid game of insult slinging
Do you not see the irony in your post at all?
tiny mind! LOL
Superiority complex. I cannot believe you’re accusing anyone else of arrogance.
That edit was done instantly.toys19Free Memberyou make a lot of assumption here I do not agree with. Since less and less working class people have been in parliament and more and more career politicians have been around the social mobility of the country has reduced.
AA I agree about the social mobility but you said above it was side issue.
Which are the assumptions you do not agree with?
grumFree MemberI was thinking a bit about this last night – it has been mentioned on here before.
Why are our currant crop of politicians of all parties so unbelievably bland and dull – and such political nonentities?
Since New Labour it’s all been about tightly controlled PR, focus groups, and ‘being a good communicator’ – all more important than any political conviction/ability.
ransosFree Membercareer politicians IMO
If you look at the cabinet and shadow cabinet, it seems that you study PPE at Oxford, get an internship working for a minister, then work your way up the greasy pole. Internships require you to have independent means and probably good connections thus ruling out the vast majority at a stroke. Perhaps the similarity of the career route has manifested itself in many people’s inability to distinguish between the main parties.
But the question is why it has become so. Traditionally, conservatives drew many of their MPs from the professions and labour from the unions. I think it’s to the detriment of both parties that this is no longer the case.
anagallis_arvensisFull Memberkeep the elite (ie the cleverest and most ballsy) in power
you are assuming that we have the cleverest in power now when it would appear a huge part of society is excluded and social mobility is reducing.
anagallis_arvensisFull MemberI cannot believe you’re accusing anyone else of arrogance.
no, you called me a chav I said I would rather be that than a ****, make of that what you will.
binnersFull MemberWhy are our currant crop of politicians of all parties so unbelievably bland and dull – and such political nonentities?
Well.. I went to school with someone who is now a shadow minister. He went from school, to Cambridge, to the labour press office, worked as a spin doctor for Tessa Jowell and David Blunkett, then after proving his worth as an unquestioning yes man was parachuted into the second safest labour seat in the country.
So he’s never actually had what most of us regard as a ‘job’, nor what most of us regard as ‘normal’ life experience. He has effectively spent his entire adult life inside the political Westminster bubble. I’m not sure he’d even be able to find his supposed ‘constituency’ on a map.
He’s absolutely representative of our present political class. The only way you can progress in the present system is to shut up, certainly have no ideology, and represent your own interests and those who are paying your
bungspolitical donationsJustAnotherLoginFree MemberI don’t really see a problem with the PM being well educated. Seems rather important in fact to have a knowledge of politics, economics, history and world affairs.
I also find it baffling this view that just because someone comes from a privileged background they immediately don’t give a damn about anyone else and that empathy is seemingly impossible.
grumFree MemberAw bless. The chavvy grad has spat the dummy.
Oh, and I’ve not said a chav is scum.No but you seem to be using the term as an insult, what do you mean by it exactly then?
I don’t really see a problem with the PM being well educated. Seems rather important in fact to have a knowledge of politics, economics, history and world affairs.
I also find it baffling this view that just because someone comes from a privileged background they immediately don’t give a damn about anyone else and that empathy is seemingly impossible.
I don’t automatically assume that, but the actions of the current government show it pretty clearly.
coffeekingFree MemberIf you have no money to start with and struggle to get a job that pays much you have very few fiscal choices to make. Todays fiscal choice do I buy food or heat the house?
I struggle with this notion of struggling to get a job, perhaps that’s the issue. I know someone who, within days of signing up to an employment agency or two in the east end (poor, no jobs apparently) of Glasgow, was fending off offers of permanent full time work (office, admin, mundane almost skill-free roles) unrelated to their non-technical quals for up to 3/4 of the salary I require a higher degree to get. On speaking to a couple of these employers and working for a few of them they found out that the bulk of people sent in by the agencies either didn’t turn up at all or turned up and thought the work level was unreasonable and walked out. All it was was answering the phone, filing papers and collecting info. I’m sure there must be people who struggle to find jobs, but it seems there’s a large number of the unemployed who just don’t want to work and could fairly easily be in reasonably paid employment? It seems the employers are struggling to find staff too.
Ultimately I think it’s down to education and trying to ensure people see the value in working both for themselves and the country. We’re obviously doing something wrong if people see more sense in lounging about at home.
anagallis_arvensisFull MemberI don’t really see a problem with the PM being well educated. Seems rather important in fact to have a knowledge of politics, economics, history and world affairs.
I also find it baffling this view that just because someone comes from a privileged background they immediately don’t give a damn about anyone else and that empathy is seemingly impossible.
You are entirely right of course, but wouldnt it be a help if the odd member of the cabinet or other MP’s around you or indeed advisers had some different life experience?
wreckerFree MemberNo but you seem to be using the term as an insult, what do you mean by it exactly then?
I’ve not used it as an insult. I’ve used it as a disqualification for middle class status. I’ve not implied that chavs are scum or that all working class are chavs. Just that chavs aren’t middle class and a couple of years at uni won’t change this.
There’s plenty out there who dislike the middle class more than they do chavs.toys19Free Memberyou are assuming that we have the cleverest in power now when it would appear a huge part of society is excluded and social mobility is reducing.
I see your point, and yes not all of them are the cleverest, but it takes a certain admirable quality to get there does it not? My point is that a large majority of the population are so badly informed that if we had pure democracy then this sceptic isle would eb a much much worse place..
(The fault of that status of poorly informed majority may well be the fault of the system but we can at least try to change that)
ransosFree MemberI don’t really see a problem with the PM being well educated. Seems rather important in fact to have a knowledge of politics, economics, history and world affairs.
Has anyone argued otherwise? The point is that to be a prominent MP, you have to follow a specific career path, which doesn’t include any kind of life experience. Binners sets out a typical example.
zokesFree MemberCan a working class person become an MP these days?
The most high-profile MP from a working class background that I can think of is Maggie. Be careful what you wish for…
anagallis_arvensisFull MemberI struggle with this notion of struggling to get a job, perhaps that’s the issue. I know someone who, within days of signing up to an employment agency or two in the east end (poor, no jobs apparently) of Glasgow, was fending off offers of permanent full time work (office, admin, mundane almost skill-free roles) unrelated to their non-technical quals for up to 3/4 of the salary I require a higher degree to get. On speaking to a couple of these employers and working for a few of them she found out that the bulk of people sent in by the agencies either didn’t turn up at all or turned up and thought the work level was unreasonable and walked out. All it was was answering the phone, filing papers and collecting info. I’m sure there must be people who struggle to find jobs, but it seems there’s a large number of the unemployed who just don’t want to work and could fairly easily be in reasonably paid employment?
whilst this may or may not be true wouldnt it be a help if someone around the gov had some direct experience (like thru’ friends or relatives) of why these people dont seem to make much effort to get a job?
ransosFree MemberI struggle with this notion of struggling to get a job, perhaps that’s the issue.
1. Most jobs available are poorly paid.
2. The number of jobs available is less than the number of people looking for work.anagallis_arvensisFull Memberhttp://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/chav
chavBritish informal, derogatory
a young lower-class person typified by brash and loutish behaviour and the wearing of (real or imitation) designer clothes.
jota180Free MemberThe most high-profile MP from a working class background that I can think of is Maggie. Be careful what you wish for…
What about Dennis Skinner?
rogerthecatFree MemberWhy are our currant crop of politicians of all parties so unbelievably bland and dull – and such political nonentities?
Easy one to answer – because if they have one ounce of personality/charisma the media will rip them apart in no time. Would love to see am MP who’s experienced more of life’s rich tapestry but they would never get past the starting gate.
anagallis_arvensisFull MemberThe most high-profile MP from a working class background that I can think of is Maggie. Be careful what you wish for…
true, but I am not thinking in party political terms here.
AristotleFree MemberBinners:
Well.. I went to school with someone who is now a shadow ministerWell, I’d expect nothing less from someone as “old money” as yourself, old bean, especially as you attended the Eton of the North.
You’ve kept it hidden well 😉
binnersFull MemberActually… David Davis bucks the trend. He’s from a working class background. Which explains why all the present members of Dave’s gang absolutely loath him. And I’ve more chance of getting within sniffing distance of even a junior ministers job than he has
coffeekingFree Memberwhilst this may or may not be true wouldnt it be a help if someone around the gov had some direct experience (like thru’ friends or relatives) of why these people dont seem to make much effort to get a job?
Certainly. But but those with the skills and abilities to reach the cabinet will undoubtedly have a) changed somewhat since they were working class and b) no longer be working class.
1. Most jobs available are poorly paid.
2. The number of jobs available is less than the number of people looking for work.1) Most of the jobs the person in question was offered were well above minimum wage. Not “support the whole family” well paid, but in the 18-22K range. Some were indeed poor, I remember one down at 14 but that was a commission based role.
2) I’m not sure where the numbers come from so it’s hard to say, but the number of jobs in the job centre were no reflection of the true scale of jobs available if you scratch the surface and don’t just wander about your local high street asking in your favourite clothes stores.And sure, maybe you’d have to have 2 jobs for a while, I’ve done it, my relatives have done it. I’ll do pretty much anything if I need the cash to keep my house afloat and not resort to being given cash by the state.
binnersFull MemberAristotle – ssssssssshhhhhhhhhhh. I’ve been getting away with my northern working class monkey shtick upto this point. 😉
The topic ‘arrogant posh boys’ is closed to new replies.