Home › Forums › Chat Forum › 2019 General Election
- This topic has 6,282 replies, 176 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by kelvin.
-
2019 General Election
-
kelvinFull Member
This election is impossible call and has been fromt he beginning.
While “impossible to call” is always true, looking at these polls, it does seem a bit “Black Knight” to keep repeating it as regards this election.
I fear Friday 13th will bring us calls of… “All right, we’ll call it a draw”… from what’s left of the Corbyn fan base.
Anyway… my postal vote is in for our Labour candidate.
boomerlivesFree MemberIt’s not that Corbyn is the only flaw. Their lack of balls to put a stop to the shitshow that is Brexit will cost them dear, whichever way it goes at the polls.
AlexSimonFull MemberMeanwhile binners – the electorate are facing bare-faced lies reported without challenge.
And Labour have still managed to catch up in the polls!Here’s the BBC comparing like-for-like in their usual manner:
Brass neck's been one of central features of this campaign – Johnson on checks (remember he DID admit back in Oct there'd be extra checks under Brexit deal however much he obfuscates over it now – define check, and define customs declaration), or Corbyn on watching the Queen
— Laura Kuenssberg (@bbclaurak) December 9, 2019
Just because JC doesn’t perfectly represent your view of what Labour should be, doesn’t mean you get to decide that the “party leadership can’t or won’t do it”
kelvinFull MemberJust because JC doesn’t perfectly represent your view of what Labour should be, doesn’t mean you get to decide that the “party leadership can’t or won’t do it”
He’s voting Labour!! Pointing out why not enough other people are is important.
By all means be amazed that people will vote for Johnson, despite knowing that he is lying to them… how can he get away with it? The alternative should clearly be preferable in so so many seats. But so many good candidates are hampered by their leader.
binnersFull MemberAnd Labour have still managed to catch up in the polls!
Going from abysmal to merely terrible isn’t really progress, is it?
I get the feeling that the ground is being prepared for another round of declaring not losing as badly as people predicted to be some kind of victory. The same as last time
AlexSimonFull MemberHe’s voting Labour!! Pointing out why not enough other people are is important.
But he’s not pointing it out. He’s making a completely factually untrue statement.
I’m saying that there are many things at play here – lots of them are completely out of the hands of the Labour leadership.Going from abysmal to merely terrible isn’t really progress, is it?
It’s the pattern that’s interesting. Different media conduct rules apply during an election.
Last time with May, we saw the BBC become much fairer during the election. The rise in the polls was astounding.
This time, I haven’t seen the same balance restore on the BBC – They seem to be using the same tactics as Boris in that they think they can get away with framing things in the same twisted way as that tweet above.They are doing pretty well against huge opposing forces in my opinion. I don’t buy any papers, but I do look at all the headlines when I’m at the local co-op. Is it any surprise that people are put off Corbyn? Look at all the ‘Russian links’ headlines on Sunday vs all the ones you never saw about already proven links between the current Tory leadership and Russia.
outofbreathFree MemberIt’s not that Corbyn is the only flaw.
Agree. For me there are three issues that stop me voting Labour this time: Brexit Policy, the pork barrel menifesto, Momentum/Corbyn. Any one of them would (probably) be a barrier to me voting Labour this time. The fact the omnishambles of an administration aren’t losing by a landslide suggests there are a lot of people who feel the same way.
Brexit will go away, but Momentum won’t, so Labours path forward is set in stone.
Win or lose, will the Torys find a way to ditch Boris post Brexit and pull themselves into some kind of credible shape before the next election? I wouldn’t bet against it.
Plus we’re due a recession between now and the next election which ought to be electorally disasterous for whoever is in power. [1]
[1] If there’s a majority government that goes 5 years and I’m not betting on that!
kelvinFull Memberthere are many things at play here
Of course that is true.
lots of them are completely out of the hands of the Labour leadership
Of course that is true.
Now we agree on that…
Corbyn’s history, personality, and approach to important policy matters have turned into a turn off even for many died in the wool Labour voters, never mind those new to voting Labour in 2017, or those with a pattern of voting Tory who need to swap to Labour for Labour to win.
kelvinFull MemberLabour is still attempting to put Brexit to one side in this debate… it should be pushing home that Brexit is a process that will take years, and we need to either prepare for it properly, with a shorter simpler route to a new close UK:EU relationship, or stop it completely. It’s a good policy. But they are allowing Johnson to dominate this issue, and this election, with his “Get Brexit Done” lie.
Puzzle is why Labour hasn't got over fact that Withdrawal Act does not get Brexit done. It is just walking onto pitch for a 10 year fight over UK's future with endless uncertainty for business and UK citizens. Yet I never hear Lab spokespersons hammering this point @jamesblitz
— Denis MacShane (@DenisMacShane) December 9, 2019
kimbersFull MemberAgree Kelvin
a lot of leave voters going to be turning on Johnson before long
outofbreathFree Memberturning
…and Boris’s approval ratings are already utterly dismal. I doubt Boris will be fighting the next election even if he wins a majority Thursday which is far from a certainty.
kelvinFull Membera lot of leave voters going to be turning on Johnson before long
In 2/3 years. But by 5 years we’ll have new gerrymandered seats, and a built in majority of Tory seats based on an even lower share of the vote.
There is also the fear that it can be turned into “politicians are all the same, none of them deliver what they promise” nonsense that is helping Johnson this time around. People think politicians can’t be trusted… and so vote for the biggest liar in politics anyway.
AlexSimonFull MemberCorbyn’s history, personality, and approach to important policy matters have turned into a turn off even for many died in the wool Labour voters
But the question is – does what they feel about his “history, personality or approach to important policy matters” actually hold water.
Do the stories of him meeting the various ‘scary’ figures stand up when examined, or even when compared against his equivalent tories. For me the answer is ‘no’ they don’t. So it’s not his history that’s the problem, it’s the reporting and analysis that’s the problem.Yes, it gives the Tories an easy goal, but only because they know that the media will repeat it ad infinitum, while completely ignoring how many times they met with the same figures.
Then you’ve got brexit. I too was very disappointed that they couldn’t come out strongly Remain – especially when it came to calling out the vote spending fraud, but I completely understand why they are trying to be neutral now – and let’s face it, this new Labour-promised referendum is the best chance that remain have had since 2016.
Unfortunately, the Leavers know this, so now find it difficult to vote Labour this time around.kelvinFull MemberLabour policy on Brexit is now fine with me. Utterly failing to successful challenge Johnson’s pretend policy is not. They need to be showing Leave voters how Johnson is conning them, and, importantly, why they (and all of us) should have a say in the Brexit process, including stopping it if what is being delivered doesn’t work for them (all of us). There are many ways to be “neutral”, but currently it feels a bit “Brexit is fine, have it if you want it, you may as well vote for Johnson’s people because he’s saying it’ll be quick, easy, and purely beneficial… oh, and he’a strong man who’ll stop the Scots and Ulster people from leaving the UK.”
Kryton57Full MemberGosh. Yet again the online help calculates me as Green Party voter. With my area currently Liberal but a scrape last time and historically a Labour borough, I’m very much confused who to vote for. I think thats Labour, but I’m uncertain of Corbyn as PM* although like some of the policies. I’m pro EU but am starting to feel like a liberal vote is wasted vs the Conservatives.
*There was a big discussion on LBC today that Corbynb’s name has been removed from most Labour propaganda material as even the party think his name reflects negatively
Help!
kelvinFull MemberThose online things put me…
SNP>LibDem>Green>Labour
But my Labour vote was easy in a Tory/Labour marginal. Don’t worry about Corbyn, he won’t get a majority, please don’t be put off by thoughts of him as PM. What seat are you in?
Kryton57Full MemberWhat seat are you in?
London / Enfield North.
Don’t worry about Corbyn, he won’t get a majority, please don’t be put off by thoughts of him as PM
Bear with me I’m not the most politically astute – so if Labour win, they’ll oust him as Leader? So we’ll end up with another unelected PM and just who might that be?
kelvinFull MemberIf Labour are the biggest party, Corbyn will probably be PM, but the “brakes” placed on him (or more importantly Milne, Murray & Len) will be immense. Other voices in the Labour Party, and which other parties prop up Labour, will be strong.
Realistically, the Conservatives will have the most seats… the election now is all about stopping Johnson getting a majority, or more realistically, making his majority as small as possible to give some power to his opponents to reign in his worst excesses.
Enfield North
https://comparethetacticals.com/enfield-north
Looks to me that in your seat voting Labour makes the most sense. This election is not the time to vote for a distant third placed party in a FPTP system when so much is at stake if we return too many blue MPs.
outofbreathFree Memberand he’a strong man who’ll stop the Scots and Ulster people from leaving the UK.”
He can’t say either because he’s been saying for decades he thinks Ulster people *should* be leaving the UK and because he may well need to do a deal with the SNP which will require a legally binding Indyref in year 1 of his government.
*There was a big discussion on LBC today that Corbynb’s name has been removed from most Labour propaganda material as even the party think his name reflects negatively
I can’t remember the correct numbers but I think his image is only on 10pc of Labour campaigning literature but is on 60pc of the other parties campaigning literature! 😀
Gosh. Yet again the online help calculates me as Green Party voter. With my area currently Liberal but a scrape last time and historically a Labour borough, I’m very much confused who to vote for. I think thats Labour, but I’m uncertain of Corbyn as PM* although like some of the policies. I’m pro EU but am starting to feel like a liberal vote is wasted vs the Conservatives.
Only you can decide but Libdem is a vote recorded as a clear ‘remain’ vote and if they win it’s proof of a clear remain seat. Nice clear signal.
outofbreathFree MemberIf Labour are the biggest party, Corbyn will probably be PM,
Libdems and SNP will not work with Torys so unless Boris wins an actual workable majority Labour will be forming the government even if they are not the biggest party. My gut feel is that part of the price of that would be for Corbyn to quit but who knows.
kiksyFree MemberBlairism was flawed but it got them elected.
In 97 Labour got 43.2% of the vote.
2001 40.7% ,
2005 35.2%.2017 Labour got 40.0% of the vote.
Due to FPTP the number of seats obviously don’t work out proportionally, but this idea that 2017 was an abject failure by Corbyn doens’t really add up.
jam-boFull MemberI don’t trust the libDems not to roll over at the first sniff of power.
v8ninetyFull MemberNice clear signal.
But wasted vote, facilitating a Borisexit.
Please, to stop Boris,
vote Labour.
kelvinFull MemberI don’t trust the libDems not to roll over at the first sniff of power.
If it gets us a referendum in 2020, with another general election a few months after that, fine by me. The Tories winning seats because people won’t vote LibDem (for fear of them propping up the Tories) to stop the Tories winning seats is how Cameron got his majority. It’s maddening that the action of people to the coalition years worked so well for the Tories… they cleaned up mostly by taking seats off the LibDems.
outofbreathFree MemberI don’t trust the libDems not to roll over at the first sniff of power.
There is no way they’re going do that after what happened last time.
In 97 Labour got 43.2% of the vote.
2001 40.7% ,
2005 35.2%.2017 Labour got 40.0% of the vote.
Due to FPTP the number of seats obviously don’t work out proportionally, but this idea that 2017 was an abject failure by Corbyn doens’t really add up.
In 97 etc Labour were beating credible opponents. In 2017 Labour were trying to beat a Tory part in chaos that had caused chaos with a leader who turned out to be useless.
You can’t ignore the opponent.
yourguitarheroFree MemberIt’s like getting the bus
There might not be one going directly to your destination, but you shouldn’t get the one going to the other way out of piqueKryton57Full MemberThanks for the responses to my post, that made things clearer. Well, obvious.
kelvinFull MemberHelping Johnson get his majority, because you don’t want Corbyn to be PM… is like walking bare footed everywhere because you don’t like the colour of your shoes.
[everyone else make up their own tortured analogy to bash the message home – if in your seat the Labour candidate can deny Johnson a seat, ignore your concerns and get on and vote Labour, please – if you are in a seat where the choices are different – do whatever you need to do to deny Johnson a little bit of power]
outofbreathFree MemberIt’s like getting the bus
There might not be one going directly to your destination, but you shouldn’t get the one going to the other way out of piqueNo, but getting on a bus that is going to ask the passengers which way they want to go later and you know the passengers are 50/50 split so it’s effectively a coin toss gets you nowhere and sends a signal to everyone that you’re happy with either destination.
In a Lib/Lab marginal I’d go Lib this time if the objective was to remain.
kiksyFree MemberIn 97 etc Labour were beating credible opponents. In 2017 Labour were trying to beat a Tory part in chaos that had caused chaos with a leader who turned out to be useless.
In 2017 we had the confusion of Brexit which has clearly seriously muddied the waters in how people vote.
6 weeks or so ago I was of the opinion that a more centrist, likable leader would of walked this election for Labour, but now I’m not so sure.
Brexit has skewed everything.
What policies could a centre-left Labour party possibly offer to a remainer Conservative to get them to switch?
We’ve seen that the so called Tory ‘moderates’ haven’t switched en-masse to the Lib Dems, despite effectively offering a manifesto that should 100% appeal to them perfectly. Ok, so Tory polls have been buoyed by the Breixt party decision not to stand but by how much?
Brexit party vote was around 13% throughout Sept-November. Cons about 35%. Brexit now down to 3 and Cons to 43%. The ‘moderate’ remainer Torys simply haven’t switched to the Lib Dems, just as they would not have switched to a centre left Labour party, and even if they did it would still make the polls roughly even.
Not a walk in the park like so many seem to think.
kelvinFull MemberNot a walk in the park like so many seem to think.
It’s FPTP… what the big two parties can achieve as regards voters swapping parties at a general election is entirely different to what a smaller third party like the LibDems can, at this kind of election. Some might say that’s a good thing, looking at how well both UKIP and Brexit Party have done in past, yet failed (and will fail) to make a dent in Westminster seats. I don’t agree. Lack of representation, and everyone having to revert back to two party politics at general elections, helps give rise to the attitudes that fed much of the Brexit vote, and Johnson’s support.
alcoleponeFree MemberChris Williamson (DerbyNorth MP – kicked out of labour, now running as a independent) was posting fliers through doors yesterday, and i managed to catching him before he got to the next house. I got into a polite conversation where i outlined the fact that he would split the vote and get a tory win for Derbyshire north. He seemed utterly convinced that he would win. It frustrates me how little co-ordination there is against the hard brexiting Tory government. I think Derby North will get a torys MP, because Lib dems and Chris Williamson are too selfish to stand down and let the likely competitive candidate stand against the Torys.
Any other election and i think its fair everyone has a party to vote for. But this is not the same as other elections.
kayla1Free MemberNo, but getting on a bus that is going to ask the passengers which way they want to go later and you know the passengers are 50/50 split so it’s effectively a coin toss gets you nowhere and sends a signal to everyone that you’re happy with either destination.
In a Lib/Lab marginal I’d go Lib this time if the objective was to remain.
Agreed, kind of, except I think the Labour ‘leave’ destination would be a good chunk nicer and ultimately way less unacceptable than any tory one so the analogy isn’t quite right. Like getting on a bus that’s either going to Cullercoats or Tynemouth, either are fine. The tory bus’d take you straight to Horden in the 80s and make you and your kids work on it 6 days a week.
I’d still prefer to Remain though.
kiksyFree MemberIt’s FPTP… what the big two parties can achieve as regards voters swapping parties at a general election is entirely different to what a smaller third party like the LibDems can, at this kind of election.
That’s true, but I still struggle to see where a reamin hard centre-left Labour would get it’s votes from.
If we take that chart, and assume that all 30% Labour leavers go Tory and all remainer Torys go Labour then it cancels it out. Torys still get Brexit voters, Labour still pick up some Lib Dem voters.
We are still in a similar boat. Why would a leave voting Tory vote for a pro-remain Labour? What possible policies could they offer, what level of charismatic leader would that require?
Where else could they get votes from?
molgripsFree MemberIn a Lib/Lab marginal I’d go Lib this time if the objective was to remain.
That could easily help hand Tories a majority which would guarantee you’d not get your remain objective.
boomerlivesFree MemberDue to FPTP the number of seats obviously don’t work out proportionally, but this idea that 2017 was an abject failure by Corbyn doens’t really add up.
Meaningless twaddle. He wasn’t PM, was he? So it can’t be counted as a win, even with the most generous of spin.
As noted above, a credible opposition would have already deported Boris and his mates to the colonies.
kelvinFull MemberSo it can’t be counted as a win, even with the most generous of spin.
“All right, we’ll call it a draw”
outofbreathFree MemberIn a Lib/Lab marginal I’d go Lib this time if the objective was to remain.
That could easily help hand Tories a majority which would guarantee you’d not get your remain objective.
No it can’t. It’s a lib/lab marginal, the clue is in the name.
kiksyFree MemberMeaningless twaddle. He wasn’t PM, was he? So it can’t be counted as a win, even with the most generous of spin.
I don’t think anyone has claimed it as a win have they?
The point I’m making is Corbyn got a similar percentage of the vote as Blair in 2001 and 5% more in 2005.
The fact that those votes weren’t in the correct seats is vital, but to make out 2017 was this disastrous landslide and Corbyn was unpopular isn’t really true is it? He was roughly on pre Iraq Blair levels, and then more popular than post Iraq Blair.
The topic ‘2019 General Election’ is closed to new replies.