Home Forums Chat Forum 2015-16 rugby, world cup year

  • This topic has 7,395 replies, 232 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by WillH.
Viewing 40 posts - 3,401 through 3,440 (of 7,396 total)
  • 2015-16 rugby, world cup year
  • onehundredthidiot
    Full Member

    We should respect the refs decisions, but in this wc it’s not the ref making them at times. Disallowed tries after tmo takes the after its awarded. This erodes the refs position as arbiter of the law.IRB cant really back a ref who has no respect for the players or belief in his own decisions. Did he think he was going to get smacked? No one else on the pitch seems to be ducking under the supposed, on here, barrage of bottles. You’d think he’d be used to upset supporters, given his history.

    jambalaya
    Free Member

    @onehundred I think the players on the field and the coaches have been respectful. We fans / internet keyboard warriors can be more direct 8) I was at the game and the ball just bounced around, hard to tell what had happened. When you see the replay it most obviously bounces off the Australian, I think the TMO would take 2 seconds to call that unintentional and thus a scrum.

    The bottle accusation I am not sure where it’s come from but you are searched on entry and can only buy plastic cups and bottles, you couldn’t throw one very far and if the ref is on the playing surface he’s miles out of range. I think he ran off due to the booing and he knows he’s made a shocking decision.

    Kryton57
    Full Member

    The bottle accusation I am not sure where it’s come from

    Chieka.

    jambalaya
    Free Member

    😯

    Just an early PSA / diary planning thought, 2016 European Rugby Cup Final is in Lyon on May 14 tickets not on sale yet. Other dates QF/SF published. New stadium opening in early 2016. 2017 final will be in Edinburgh

    ERC Dates and Final

    wanmankylung
    Free Member

    Referee Craig Joubert was wrong to award a last-minute penalty against Scotland in their World Cup quarter-final defeat by Australia at Twickenham, says World Rugby.
    Scotland led 34-32 when Joubert ruled Jon Welsh was deliberately offside for playing the ball following a knock-on by a team-mate.
    The governing body said that, because Australia’s Nick Phipps touched the ball, “the appropriate decision should have been a scrum to Australia for the original knock-on”.

    IdleJon
    Free Member

    And rugby descends even further into farce.

    unknown
    Free Member

    Excellent, so we’re in the semi final then? Or are we replaying the last 2 min?

    mefty
    Free Member

    They also said he was unable to use the TMO.

    CaptainFlashheart
    Free Member

    We should be (and have been!) able to bitch and moan about this sort of thing on here and on other platforms.

    World Rugby should just STFU.

    Appalling decision to make any comment at all.

    Stoner
    Free Member

    at the very least World Rugby could have been much more supportive of the difficulty of the decision making given the number of bodies in the ricochet. Of course, the presumption might than be that with no clear foul, there should not have been a penalty, BUT if it looked to joubert like knock on then it was his prerogative to award a penalty on the back of what he saw even if he was wrong. I cant believe anyone thinks he was being either negligent or spiteful, he was just mistaken.

    Kryton57
    Full Member

    In Henry now they’ve done that, the penalty should be struck off, or more I practically the result null and void and the match replayed. Imagine the Aussie fuss…

    Kryton57
    Full Member

    Now they’ve done that, the penalty should be struck off, or more I practically the result null and void and the match replayed. Imagine the Aussie fuss…

    unknown
    Free Member

    It was nothing more than a mistake, but he was too quick to make the decision and/or influenced by aussie appeals. He also knew he was wrong but wasn’t man enough to stay on the pitch to shake hands. Any one of those things makes him unsuitable to referee at that level in my book.

    scotroutes
    Full Member

    I expect the Australian Rugby authorities are sitting round a table this very minute discussing the draft of their letter withdrawing Australia from the semi final.

    mefty
    Free Member

    Now they’ve done that, the penalty should be struck off, or more I practically the result null and void and the match replayed. Imagine the Aussie fuss…

    Referees make mistakes, that is part of the game, very sad for Scottish followers but nothing can be done now. I don’t think World Rugby statement is a problem – mistakes happen – better to be honest about them and debate whether improvements can be made.

    theotherjonv
    Free Member

    I wonder if he realised the mistake (or suspected it from the reactions).

    Here’s a bit of whataboutery for you. What about if he’d asked for a TMO decision anyway. Would the TMO have refused to give it?

    Is it better to follow the rules (about what TMO can be used for) and an injustice occurs; or ignore those rules but get ultimately the right outcome?

    Would Australia have felt equally hard done by if he’d got the right decision by the wrong route?

    All to illustrate – it’s a bloody tough job done by men who believe they are making the right calls; damned if they do, damned if they don’t. It was wrong to leg it at the end (bottles notwithstanding) but don’t judge the man until you’ve walked a mile in his boots.

    anagallis_arvensis
    Full Member

    Anyway looking ahead, Schmidt, but schit or still the messiah? Christ kjows who we go for as the next Lions coach.

    wrecker
    Free Member

    Is Webb going to get the 9 shirt back? I thought Davies was…..even better……

    wanmankylung
    Free Member

    I suspect that they’ll change the TMO rules to account for potential result changing decisions. I am not too bothered about getting beat. It was a wonderful display by Scotland, and I would have ripped your arm off if you offered me that result before kick off. Good luck to Australia. I hope they go on and win it.

    CaptainFlashheart
    Free Member

    RFU reportedly sniffing around Schmidt with a view to buying him out of contract.

    DanW
    Free Member

    Is Webb going to get the 9 shirt back? I thought Davies was…..even better……

    Wales have so many good 9’s that they should go with the form player IMO and that may change by the 6N. To be honest Gareth Davies may not even get back in to the Scarlets team as Aled Davies has been pretty awesome so far too. Not sure how long Webb is out for- anyone remember?

    namastebuzz
    Free Member

    Joubert made the error but it was understandable given his viewpoint. However, as he presumably saw on the big screen a better angle and what really happened could he not have employed common sense and awarded the scrum? He wouldn’t be using the TMO as such but he would be using all the evidence available to him.

    What would Nigel Owens have done?

    Kryton57
    Full Member

    RFU reportedly sniffing around Schmidt with a view to buying him out of contract.

    You mean, the left hand has made a decision even before the right hand had announced the investigatory panel? English rugby in mystery selection process based on whatevery?

    Surely not.

    wrecker
    Free Member

    You mean, the left hand has made a decision even before the right hand had announced the investigatory panel? English rugby in mystery selection process based on whatevery?

    Idle gossip I reckon. They wouldn’t chance even sounding anyone out before the post mortem.

    Kryton57
    Full Member

    “Paper clip seller starts RFU conspiracy”

    … Says the Daily Mail.

    jambalaya
    Free Member

    I think the IRB did the only thing they could and admitted the mistake, it’s obvious from the TV replays it was the wrong decision. They also, correctly, point out that the TMO cannot be used (technically) for a review. @wanman is correct they will change the TMPO rules, once you have TMO its daft not to be able to use it for everything as clearly a 78th minute penalty is just as important as a 2nd minute try. You can’t replay the game as it was a mistake, so hats off to the IRB for just saying so.

    @namaste , no I don’t think the error was understandable. In that situation you have to be really really sure it was intentional

    I don’t buy the Schmidt rumours, the review will take place after the RWC. I’m glad Rob Andrew has nothing to do with it, you do wonder what the £500k pa the RFU pays him is actually for. Hopefully the review will do away with his position entirely.

    CaptainFlashheart
    Free Member

    Was in Midi Olympique, Kryters.

    Lifer
    Free Member

    There’s no ‘technically’ about it, it can’t be used for every call.

    whatnobeer
    Free Member

    What’s the definition of ‘foul play’ in rugby? Does it need to be a potential carding offense, or just one that results in a penalty?

    DanW
    Free Member

    They even mentioned the RFU’s interest in Schmidt on the Ireland game commentary

    Stoner
    Free Member

    Jamba, the test of intention is by the action of the offside player. If he can’t avoid being touched by the ball then it is accidental offside. 11.6 (a).
    Anything else is intentional.

    It is not a test of the actions of the first player.

    Stoner
    Free Member

    Whatnobeer, the definition of foul play runs to 8 pages in my book of laws 🙂

    But the intro goes:
    Anything…. That a player does against the letter or the spirit of the laws of the game. It includes obstruction, unfair play, repeated infringements, dangerous play and misconduct which is prejudicial to the game.

    deadlydarcy
    Free Member

    Joël Jutge – the guy who’s just thrown Joubert to the lions – wonder if he’s ever missed something even more blatant on a rugby field. I mean, real, bare faced cheating…not some heat of the moment thing. Might have been around the same time in the game though.

    onehundredthidiot
    Full Member

    So it comes back to:

    If he gives a penalty in that situation he suspects foul play and can go to tmo.

    Otherwise its accidental and scrum/free kick. As happened earlier.

    namastebuzz
    Free Member

    the test of intention is by the action of the offside player. If he can’t avoid being touched by the ball then it is accidental offside. 11.6 (a).
    Anything else is intentional.

    In that case if a player throws a forward pass to another player who’s marginally in front of him and that player catches the pass (which happens all the time,) then technically, that’s intentionally playing the ball in an offside position?

    I’ve often thought that playing the ball when it comes forward off a team mate is frequently done instinctively and it seems harsh to award a penalty unless the offside player has done it purely to gain an unfair advantage.

    Maybe it’s time for a rethink on many of the technical infringements that result in penalties and, IMO, blight the game.

    aracer
    Free Member

    What I don’t think has been done is consider what if a scrum had been awarded. So Australia win their scrum, inside the Scotland half. Half a dozen phases gains them 20m. At which point it’s played back for a drop goal with the clock already past 80 minutes. Same result.

    OK, so it might not have happened like that – Scotland might have collapsed the scrum or conceded a penalty at some other point during those phases. You’d have to think though that with possession in the Scotland half, Australia were favourites to find some way to score. The idea that had the penalty not been awarded Scotland would have won is quite a big assumption.

    Albanach
    Free Member

    Not that it matters now but how late does a hit need to be for the TMO to intervene – in the vine I’ve seen Hogg is hit 3 seconds after the ball leaves his foot?

    Stoner
    Free Member

    In that case if a player throws a forward pass to another player who’s marginally in front of him and that player catches the pass (which happens all the time,) then technically, that’s intentionally playing the ball in an offside position?

    Not quite, the law is more relaxed about the forward pass it is only intentional offside if the intention is on the part of the passer not the receiver. (12.1 f) (and that intention is to pass the ball forward, rather than not quite manage to pass the ball flat or backwards)

    And always not forgetting that in most forward passes, the receiver usually starts off in an onside and is never actually offside. He just receives the ball in front of the passer.

    loum
    Free Member

    CaptainFlashheart – Member
    RFU reportedly sniffing around Schmidt with a view to buying him out of contract.

    Repotedly sniffing round Shaun Edwards too.
    And Gatland.
    And Vern Cotter.

    Only WC coach not been mentioned for THE JOB so far is PSA.
    Must be in secret contract talks already then. 😉

    jambalaya
    Free Member

    RFU should never had let Edwards go, proven club coach gaining international experience. They should have found a away to get him to stay and helped him prepare for taking the top job at some point. My view is it will go to an English coach (80%) vs Lancaster keeping the job (20%)

    @Stoner the IRB have said flat out it was the wrong decision.

    @aracer indeed, we don’t know what would have happened but the odds would have been much more in favour of Scotland

    PSA for Stade Français v Munster in November, the cheapest Cat 4 tickets are €13-15 and a very good view in a great club stadium tickets

Viewing 40 posts - 3,401 through 3,440 (of 7,396 total)

The topic ‘2015-16 rugby, world cup year’ is closed to new replies.