The problem for “review” type mags is that there really aren’t any actually crap bikes any more. Just like in the automotive world with modern cars, the objective differences between bikes is now so vanishingly small it becomes a subjective review by large. As such you get all sorts of mumbo jumbo like “makes the impossible, possible” and such, which really means absolutely nothing.
Hence, the reviews only really make sense in two areas:
1) value for money (how much stuff you get for your cash
and
2) subjective, bang-on-trend, (ie “enduro etc) responses not based on any facts. ie, they like the shape of the frame, or it’s colour, or those are my fav handlebars etc