Subscribe now and choose from over 30 free gifts worth up to £49 - Plus get £25 to spend in our shop
Perhaps you'll understand more when you read this Ernie
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-24586951
Partial quotes taken out of one context and played against partial quotes taken from another don't make a story, even if you or the Daily Mirror try and make it into one.
Particularly where the editor has to insert a context that was not in the words spoken,
[i]model of authoritarian capitalism [u][in China][/u] we are seeing [/i]
to make it into one
Perhaps you'll understand more when you read this Ernie
WTF has Cameron's jumper got to do with anything ?
I know that you like a good deviation tactic Z-11 but linking to a nonsense story about Cameron's jumper is desperate even by your standards.
because as NW said, an educated population is never a bad thing. I dont feel conned into getting a degree as you put it.Why? There is already a generation who were conned into going to university getting into debt to find there were no jobs, why push more into it?
I think you have no idea quite how much a shutdown costs, more like the unions playing brinkmanship knowing that shutting down per minute probably outstrips the fired guys wages several times.Oh come on, there's a veneer of truth on that but that's all. Ineos set the timescales, they refused to go to ACAS until it was so late that the shutdown was inevitable, so that's undeniably on them not Unite. So while it's true that the talks didn't reach a conclusion fast enough to stop the shutdown, that's because Ineos planned it that way.
I think you have no idea quite how much a shutdown costs, more like the unions playing brinkmanship knowing that shutting down per minute probably outstrips the fired guys wages several times.
Somewhere between $50m and $100m according to the Sunday Times, but as their article said, this is about company politics (owner vs Union) rather than money and Ineos can easily afford to close the plant.